Onset and duration of ۲% lidocaine as inferior alveolar nerve block versus buccal/lingual infiltration of ۴% articaine in mandibular second molars: Clinical trial study
Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 8
This Paper With 5 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JOHOE-7-3_004
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 مرداد 1403
Abstract:
BACKGROUND AND AIM: The effectiveness of buccal or lingual (B/L) infiltration of ۴% articaine as supplemental injection for pulp anesthesia of mandibular teeth was confirmed in previous studies. However, this study was aimed to compare the effectiveness of ۲% lidocaine as inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) versus B/L infiltration of ۴% articaine for pulp anesthesia, as primary injection in mandibular second molars.METHODS: Thirty adult volunteers ranging from ۱۸ to ۴۰ years old with no systemic disease or medicine intake were included in this split-mouth, double-blind, randomized clinical trial study. Each mandibular side of included subjects was allocated randomly to control group (IANB using ۲% lidocaine and ۱/۸۰۰۰۰ epinephrine using direct technique) and B/L infiltration group using ۴% articaine (Septanest; Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fosses, France). After obtaining base line sensitivity, electric pulp testing (EPT) was done at ۵, ۸, ۱۱, ۱۵, ۲۰, ۲۵, ۳۰, ۴۵, ۶۰, ۷۵, and ۹۰ minutes post injections. The data were analyzed using chi-square test.RESULTS: The success rate of anesthesia for IANB group was ۸۳.۳% (۲۵ of ۳۰ subjects) and ۳۰% (۹ of ۳۰ subjects) for B/L infiltration group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P = ۰.۰۰۰۵). The mean onset time of pulp anesthesia for IANB group was ۲۲.۶ ± ۳۰.۹ minutes and ۶۵.۵ ± ۳۸.۰ for B/L infiltration group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P = ۰.۰۰۰۱). The mean duration time of pulp anesthesia for IANB group was ۵۳.۰ ± ۲۷.۴ minutes and ۱۰.۶ ± ۱۷.۲ for B/L infiltration group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant (P = ۰.۰۰۰۱).CONCLUSION: The results indicated that IANB using ۲% lidocaine was more successful than B/L infiltration of ۴% articaine in onset and duration of pulp anesthesia of mandibular second molars as primary injections.
Keywords:
Authors
Ehsan Esnaashari
Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontic, School of Dentistry, Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Hengameh Bakhtiar
Associate Professor, Department of Endodontic, School of Dentistry, Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Bahareh Nazari
Student of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Shadi Mirzaei
Student of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Sohrab Tour-Savadkouhi
Assistant Professor, Department of Endodontic, School of Dentistry, Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :