Providing Value to New Health Technology: The Early Contribution of Entrepreneurs, Investors, and Regulatory Agencies

Publish Year: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 10

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-6-9_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 مرداد 1403

Abstract:

Background New technologies constitute an important cost-driver in healthcare, but the dynamics that lead to their emergence remains poorly understood from a health policy standpoint. The goal of this paper is to clarify how entrepreneurs, investors, and regulatory agencies influence the value of emerging health technologies.   Methods Our ۵-year qualitative research program examined the processes through which new health technologies were envisioned, financed, developed and commercialized by entrepreneurial clinical teams operating in Quebec’s (Canada) publicly funded healthcare system.   Results Entrepreneurs have a direct influence over a new technology’s value proposition, but investors actively transform this value. Investors support a technology that can find a market, no matter its intrinsic value for clinical practice or healthcare systems. Regulatory agencies reinforce the “double” value of a new technology —as a health intervention and as an economic commodity— and provide economic worth to the venture that is bringing the technology to market.   Conclusion Policy-oriented initiatives such as early health technology assessment (HTA) and coverage with evidence may provide technology developers with useful input regarding the decisions they make at an early stage. But to foster technologies that bring more value to healthcare systems, policy-makers must actively support the consideration of health policy issues in innovation policy.

Keywords:

Innovation Policy , Health Policy , Health Technology Development (HTA) , Technology-Based Ventures , Early HTA

Authors

Pascale Lehoux

Department of Health Management, Evaluation and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montréal, QC, Canada

Fiona A. Miller

Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Geneviève Daudelin

Institute of Public Health Research of University of Montreal (IRSPUM), Montréal, QC, Canada

Jean-Louis Denis

École Nationale d’administration publique (ENAP), Quebec City, QC, Canada

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Dixon-Woods M, Amalberti R, Goodman S, Bergman B, Glasziou P. ...
  • Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O, ...
  • Gelijns AC, Russo MJ, Hong KN, Brown LD, Ascheim DD, ...
  • Leonardi PM, Barley S. What’s under construction here? Social action, ...
  • Lehoux P, Williams-Jones B, Miller F, Urbach D, Tailliez S. ...
  • Henshall C, Schuller T. Health technology assessment, value-based decision making, ...
  • Markiewicz K, van Til JA, Ijzerman MJ. Medical devices early ...
  • Nielsen CP, Funch TM, Kristensen FB. Health technology assessment: research ...
  • Pietzsch JB, Paté-Cornell ME. Early technology assessment of new medical ...
  • Lehoux P, Miller FA, Daudelin G, Urbach DR. How venture ...
  • Chesbrough H, Rosenbloom RS. The role of business model in ...
  • Sapolsky H. M. Managing the Medical Arms Race: Innovation and ...
  • Sampat B, Drummond M. Another special relationship? Interactions between health ...
  • Garber S, Gates SM, Keeler EB. Redirecting Innovation in US Health ...
  • Robinson JC. Biomedical innovation in the era of health care ...
  • Braunerhjelm P, Henrekson M. Entrepreneurship, institutions, and economic dynamism: lessons ...
  • Hirsch-Kreinsen H. Financial market and technological innovation. Ind Innov. ۲۰۱۱;۱۸(۴):۳۵۱-۳۶۸. Doi:۱۰.۱۰۸۰/۱۳۶۶۲۷۱۶.۲۰۱۱.۵۷۳۹۵ ...
  • Nightingale P, Coad A. Muppets and gazelles: political and methodological ...
  • Horizon ۲۰۲۰ Work Programme ۲۰۱۶-۲۰۱۷. Innovation in SMEs. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h۲۰۲۰/wp/۲۰۱۶_۲۰۱۷/main/h۲۰۲۰-wp۱۶۱۷-sme_en.pdf ...
  • Lehoux P, Daudelin G, Hivon M, Miller FA, Denis JL. ...
  • Lehoux P, Daudelin G, Williams-Jones B, Denis JL, Longo C. ...
  • Sutton RI. The virtues of closet qualitative research. Organ Sci. ۱۹۹۷;۸(۱):۹۷-۱۰۶ ...
  • Flyvbjerg B. Case study (۳۰۱-۳۱۶). In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, ...
  • McCulloch P. The EU’s system for regulating medical devices. BMJ. ۲۰۱۲;۳۴۵:e۷۱۲۶. Doi:۱۰.۱۱۳۶/bmj.e۷۱۲۶ ...
  • Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. ...
  • Campbell B. How to judge the value of innovation: more ...
  • Blomqvist A, Busby C, Husereau D. Capturing value from health ...
  • Advisory Panel on Healthcare Innovation. Unleashing innovation: Excellent healthcare for ...
  • Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P. Developing a framework for ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع