Contextual Factors Influencing Cost and Quality Decisions in Health and Care: A Structured Evidence Review and Narrative Synthesis

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 23

This Paper With 13 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-7-8_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 مرداد 1403

Abstract:

Background Decisions affecting cost and quality are taken across health and care but investigation of the mediating role of context in these is in its infancy. This paper presents a synthesis of the evidence on the contextual factors that influence ‘decisions of value’ – defined as those characterised by having a significant and demonstrable impact on both quality and resources – in health and care. The review considers the full range of resource/quality decisions and synthesises knowledge on the contextual drivers of these.   Methods The method involved structured evidence review and narrative synthesis. Literature was identified through searches of electronic databases (HMIC, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, NHS Evidence, Cochrane, Web of Knowledge, ABI Inform/Proquest), journal and bibliography hand-searching and snowball searching using citation analysis. Structured data extraction was performed drawing out descriptive information and content against review aims and questions. Data synthesis followed a thematic approach in accordance with the varied nature of the retrieved literature.   Results Twenty-one literature items reporting ۱۴ research studies and seven literature reviews met the inclusion criteria. The review shows that in health and care contexts, research into decisions of value in health and care is in its infancy and contains wide variation in approach and remit. The evidence is drawn from a range of service and country settings and this reduces generalisability or transferability of findings. An area of relative strength in the published evidence is inquiry into factors influencing coverage and commissioning decisions in health care systems. Allocative decisions have therefore been more consistently researched than technical decisions. We use Pettigrew’s (۱۹۸۵) distinction between inner and outer context to structure analysis of the range of factors reported as being influential. These include: evidence/information, organisational culture and governance regimes, and; economic and political conditions.   Conclusion Decisions of value in health and care are subject to range of intersecting influences that often lead to a departure from narrow notions of rational decision-making. Future research should pay greater attention to the relatively under-explored area of technical, as opposed to allocative, decision-making.

Authors

Iestyn Williams

Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Hilary Brown

Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Paul Healy

NHS Confederation, London, UK

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Berwick DM, Nolan TW, Whittington J. The triple aim: care, ...
  • Pettigrew AM. The awakening giant: continuity and change in Imperial Chemical Industries. Chichester: ...
  • Academy of Medical Royal Colleges/NHS Confederation Decisions of Value: summary of ...
  • Beauvais B, Wells R. Does money really matter? A review ...
  • Williams I. Organizational readiness for innovation in health care: some ...
  • Brown P, Alaszewski A, Pilgrim D, Calnan M. The quality ...
  • Brehmer B. Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. Acta ...
  • Robert G, Harlock J, Williams I. Disentangling rhetoric and reality: ...
  • Lin V, Gibson B. Evidence-based health policy. Melbourne, VIC: Oxford University Press; ...
  • Simon HA. Information-processing theory of human problem solving. Handbook Learning ...
  • McCaughey D, Bruning NS. Rationality versus reality: the challenges of ...
  • Davis JH. Group decision and social interaction: a theory of ...
  • Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision ...
  • Reyna VF, Brainerd CJ. Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in ...
  • Dobrow MJ, Goel V, Upshur RE. Evidence-based health policy: context ...
  • Parayitam S, Phelps LD, Olsen BJ. Strategic decision‐making in the ...
  • Shayo EH, Norheim OF, Mboera LE, et al. Challenges to ...
  • Goll I, Rasheed AA. The Relationships between Top Management Demographic ...
  • Shepherd NG, Rudd JM. The influence of context on the ...
  • Suchman MC. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manage ...
  • Pye A, Pettigrew A. Studying Board Context, Process and Dynamics: ...
  • Bate SP, Mendel P, Robert G. Organising for quality: the improvement ...
  • Squires JE, Graham ID, Hutchinson AM, et al. Identifying the ...
  • Khan K, Terriet G, Sowden A, Kleijnen J. Undertaking systematic reviews ...
  • Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and ...
  • Eddama O, Coast J. A systematic review of the use ...
  • Williams I, McIver S, Moore D, Bryan S. The use ...
  • Fraser KD, Estabrooks C. What factors influence case managers' resource ...
  • Vuorenkoski L, Toiviainen H, Hemminki E. Decision-making in priority setting ...
  • Miller R, Williams I, Allen K, Glasby J. Evidence, insight, ...
  • Abelson J. Understanding the role of contextual influences on local ...
  • Bazzoli GJ, Clement JP, Lindrooth RC, et al. Hospital financial ...
  • Finocchiaro Castro M, Guccio C, Pignataro G, Rizzo I. The ...
  • Denis JL, Champagne F, Contandriopoulos AP, Cazale L. Determinants of ...
  • Dranove D, Hughes EF, Shanley M. Determinants of HMO formulary ...
  • Fischer KE. A systematic review of coverage decision-making on health ...
  • Fraser KD, Estabrooks C, Allen M, Strang V. Factors that ...
  • Hensher M, Fulop N. The influence of health needs assessment ...
  • Kisa A, Kavuncubasi S, Ersoy K. The influence of financial ...
  • Li L, Benton WC. Hospital capacity management decisions: Emphasis on ...
  • Li L, Benton WC. Hospital technology and nurse staffing management ...
  • Paudyal V, Hansford D, Cunningham S, Stewart D. Community pharmacists' ...
  • Polisena J, Clifford T, Elshaug AG, Mitton C, Russell E, ...
  • Roggenkamp SD, White KR, Bazzoli GJ. Adoption of hospital case ...
  • Sosnowy CD, Weiss LJ, Maylahn CM, Pirani SJ, Katagiri NJ. ...
  • Wright B, Martin GP. Mission, margin, and the role of ...
  • Berta W, Laporte A, Kachan N. Unpacking the relationship between ...
  • Foot C, Sonola L, Maybin, J, Naylor C. Service-line management. Can ...
  • Davies HT, Mannion R, Jacobs R, Powell AE, Marshall MN. ...
  • Stock GN, McFadden KL, Gowen CR. Organizational culture, critical success ...
  • ۵۱ Konteh FH, Mannion R, Davies HT. Clinical governance views ...
  • Papadakis VM, Lioukas S, Chambers D. Strategic decision-making processes: the ...
  • Keinan G, Friedland N, Ben-Porath Y. Decision making under stress: ...
  • Starcke K, Wolf OT, Markowitsch HJ, Brand M. Anticipatory stress ...
  • Zinn JO. Heading into the unknown: Everyday strategies for managing ...
  • Pfister HR, Bohm,G. The multiplicity of emotions: a framework of ...
  • Bellman RE, Zadeh LA. Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Manage ...
  • Zey M. Criticisms of rational choice models. In Zey, M. Decision-making: ...
  • Nalbandian J, Klingner DE. Integrating Context and Decision Strategy: A ...
  • Mousavi S, Garrison J. Toward a transactional theory of decision ...
  • Williams I. Institutions and health care rationing: the example of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع