Developing a Framework for a Program Theory-Based Approach to Evaluating Policy Processes and Outcomes: Health in All Policies in South Australia

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 54

This Paper With 12 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HPM-7-6_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 مرداد 1403

Abstract:

Background The importance of evaluating policy processes to achieve health equity is well recognised but such evaluation encounters methodological, theoretical and political challenges. This paper describes how a program theorybased evaluation framework can be developed and tested, using the example of an evaluation of the South Australian Health in All Policies (HiAP) initiative.   Methods A framework of the theorised components and relationships of the HiAP initiative was produced to guide evaluation. The framework was the product of a collaborative, iterative process underpinned by a policy-research partnership and drew on social and political science theory and relevant policy literature.   Results The process engaged key stakeholders to capture both HiAP specific and broader bureaucratic knowledge and was informed by a number of social and political science theories. The framework provides a basis for exploring the interactions between framework components and how they shape policy-making and public policy. It also enables an assessment of HiAP’s success in integrating health and equity considerations in policies, thereby laying a foundation for predicting the impacts of resulting policies.   Conclusion The use of a program theory-based evaluation framework developed through a consultative process and informed by social and political science theory has accommodated the complexity of public policy-making. The framework allows for examination of HiAP processes and impacts, and for the tracking of contribution towards distal outcomes through the explicit articulation of the underpinning program theory.

Authors

Angela Lawless

College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Fran Baum

Southgate Institute for Health Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Toni Delany-Crowe

Southgate Institute for Health Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Colin MacDougall

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Carmel Williams

Department of Health and Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Dennis McDermott

The Poche Centre for Indigenous Health and Well-being, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Helen van Eyk

Southgate Institute for Health Society and Equity, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Walt G, Shiffman J, Schneider H, Murray SF, Brugha R, ...
  • Sabatier P. The Need for Better Theories. In: Sabatier P, ...
  • de Leeuw E, Clavier C, Breton E. Health policywhy research ...
  • Colebatch H, Hoppe R, Noordegraaf M. Understanding Policy Work. In: ...
  • Carey G. Re-Conceptualising Public Health Interventions in Government: A Response ...
  • Colebatch H, Hoppe R, Noordegraaf M. The Lessons for Policy ...
  • Kokkinen L, Shankardass K, O'Campo P, Muntaner C. Taking health ...
  • Farquharson K. A Different Kind of Snowball: Identifying Key Policymakers. ...
  • Signal LN, Bowers SG, Edwards R, et al. Process, pitfalls ...
  • Donaldson SI. Program Theory-Driven Evaluation Science: Strategies and Applications. New ...
  • Mayne J. Contribution analysis: An approach to exploring cause and ...
  • Poland B, Frohlich K, Cargo M. Context as a Fundamental ...
  • Blamey A, Mackenzie M. Theories of change and realistic evaluation ...
  • Carey G, Friel S. Understanding the role of public administration ...
  • Freiler A, Muntaner C, Shankardass K, et al. Glossary for ...
  • Hendriks AM, Kremers SP, Gubbels JS, Raat H, de Vries ...
  • Weiss CH. How can theory-based evaluation make greater headway? Eval ...
  • Mayne J. Contribution analysis: coming of age? Evaluation. ۲۰۱۲;۱۸(۳):۲۷۰-۲۸۰. doi:۱۰.۱۱۷۷/۱۳۵۶۳۸۹۰۱۲۴۵۱۶۶ ...
  • Delahais T, Toulemonde J. Applying contribution analysis: Lessons from five ...
  • Funnell S, Rogers P. Purposeful Program Theory: Effective use of ...
  • Hunt J, Shackley S. Reconceiving science and policy: academic, fiducial ...
  • Considine M. Making Public Policy: Institutions, Actors, Strategies. Cambridge: Polity ...
  • Government of South Australia. South Australia’s Strategic Plan, Creating opportunity. ...
  • Lawless AP, Williams C, Hurley C, Wildgoose D, Sawford A, ...
  • Government of South Australia. The South Australian approach to Health ...
  • World Health Organization. Health in all policies: Helsinki statement. Framework ...
  • Ståhl T, Wismar M, Ollila E, Lahtinen E, Leppo K. ...
  • Baum F, Lawless A, Delany T, et al. Evaluation of ...
  • Carey G, Crammond B, Keast R. Creating change in government ...
  • Donaldson SI, Lipsey MW. Roles for theory in contemporary evaluation ...
  • Judge K, Bauld L. Strong theory, flexible methods: Evaluating complex ...
  • Stame N. Theory-based evaluation and types of complexity. Evaluation. ۲۰۰۴;۱۰(۱):۵۸-۷۶. ...
  • Leeuw F, Vaessen J. Mind the gap: perspectives on policy ...
  • Rogers PJ. Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex ...
  • Rogers PJ, Weiss CH. Theory‐based evaluation: Reflections ten years on: ...
  • Weiss CH. Which links in which theories shall we evaluate? ...
  • Lawless A, Freeman T, Bentley M, Baum F, Jolley G. ...
  • Birckmayer JD, Weiss CH. Theory-based evaluation in practice. What do ...
  • Quigley R. Role of Health Impact Assessment in Health in ...
  • Delany T, Harris P, Williams C, et al. Health Impact ...
  • Mannheimer LN, Lehto J, Ostlin P. Window of opportunity for ...
  • Ollila E. Health in All Policies: from rhetoric to action. ...
  • Exworthy M. Policy to tackle the social determinants of health: ...
  • Ezzy D. Qualitative analysis: Practice and Innovation. Crows Nest, NSW: ...
  • Pollitt C. Context: What kind of missing link? In: Pollitt ...
  • Clark J. Contexts: forms of agency and action. In: Pollitt ...
  • Williams C, Lawless A, Parkes H. The South Australian Health ...
  • Sabatier PA. An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and ...
  • Newman L, Ludford I, Williams C, Herriot M. Applying Health ...
  • Noordegraaf M. Academic Accounts of Policy Experience. In: Colebatch H, ...
  • Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith HC. Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy ...
  • Jenkins-Smith HC, Nohrstedt D, Weible CM, Sabatier PA. The advocacy ...
  • Howlett M, Ramesh M, Perl A. Studying Public Policy: Policy ...
  • Lowndes V, Roberts M. Why Institutions Matter - The new ...
  • Scott WR. Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Los ...
  • Marsh D. Comparing policy networks. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press; ...
  • Kingdon J. Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. ۲nd ed. Boston: ...
  • Giddens A. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory ...
  • Giddens A. Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the ...
  • Solar O, Irwin A. A conceptual framework for action on ...
  • Delany T, Lawless A, Baum F, et al. Health in ...
  • Dwyer J, Silburn K, Wilson G. National Strategies for Improving ...
  • Greenhalgh T, Humphrey C, Hughes J, Macfarlane F, Butler C, ...
  • Pawson R, Greenhalgh T, Harvey G, Walshe K. Realist synthesis: ...
  • Stake R. The Case Study Method in Social Inquiry. In: ...
  • Lincoln YS, Guba EG. The Only Generalization is: There is ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع