Copula-Based Risk Modeling: A Comparative Analysis of MCAViaR and Gaussian Copulas for Global Indices
Publish Year: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 59
This Paper With 30 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JMMF-5-2_005
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 آبان 1404
Abstract:
This study comparatively analyzes two advanced financial risk modeling frameworks: a copula-based Value-at-Risk (VaR) approach and the Multivariate Conditional Autoregressive Value-at-Risk (MCAViaR) model. We assess their effectiveness in capturing risk dynamics across diverse global markets, using daily log returns from January ۱, ۲۰۱۰, to December ۳۱, ۲۰۲۴, for TEDPIX, S&P ۵۰۰, and BIST ۱۰۰. This research addresses limitations of traditional linear correlation, especially during market stress.The copula methodology involves two stages: fitting ARMA-GARCH models with Student’s t-distributed innovations for marginal distributions, then employing Gaussian, Student’s t, and Clayton copulas to model inter-market dependence, including tail dependence. MCAViaR, conversely, directly estimates conditional quantiles, adapting to evolving market conditions. Empirical validation is performed through rigorous backtesting, including Kupiec, Christoffersen, and Dynamic Quantile (DQ) tests.Results indicate significant differences. While Student’s t and Clayton copulas effectively capture tail dependence (evidenced by degrees of freedom and positive Clayton parameters), all models—both copula-based and MCAViaR—universally failed the stringent DQ tests across all indices and quantiles. This highlights systematic misspecification in capturing dynamic risk. Despite this, MCAViaR showed a more adaptive nature to sudden market shocks and provided visually more responsive VaR estimates than static copula specifications.The study underscores the necessity of robust, tail-sensitive models for accurate risk assessment in cross-border portfolios. Practical recommendations include adopting Student-t or Clayton copulas, integrating regime-switching mechanisms into MCAViaR, and employing multi-horizon stress testing to enhance dynamic risk management and account for market-specific behaviors.
Keywords:
Authors
Mohammadreza Rostami
Department of Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
Fatemeh Rasti
Department of Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
Ebrahim Abbasi
Department of Management, Faculty of Social Sciences and Economics, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :