Social Media and the Protection of Minority Groups: Mechanisms, Limitations, and Outcomes
Publish Year: 1404
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 10
This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
LLCSCONF23_031
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 8 دی 1404
Abstract:
Social media platforms have become critical arenas for both the empowerment and endangerment of minority groups. This paper examines how social media companies seek to protect racial, ethnic, religious, LGBTQ+, and other minority communities through various mechanisms, the limitations of these efforts, and the outcomes in terms of user safety, inclusion, mobilization, and harm. Key protective mechanisms include content moderation policies (e.g. removing hate speech and harassment), community standards that explicitly forbid attacks on protected groups, user-driven counterspeech initiatives to combat hate, design features that allow users to filter or block abusive content, and compliance with emerging regulations. However, significant limitations undermine these protections: algorithmic moderation often lacks cultural nuance and can mistakenly silence minority voices, enforcement is inconsistent and sometimes biased, and gaps in moderation (especially across languages and regions) leave vulnerable groups exposed. These shortcomings can lead to an over-policing of marginalized users’ content alongside under-enforcement against those who target them. The outcomes of social media interventions have thus been mixed. On one hand, content moderation and safety tools have improved user safety in some contexts and enabled minority communities to mobilize for social change online. On the other, online hate and bias continue to inflict harm – from excluding minority voices in everyday digital discourse to contributing to real-world violence in extreme cases. This paper concludes with a discussion of how social media’s promise for inclusion and community-building is tempered by persistent challenges in protecting vulnerable groups, and it underscores the need for more nuanced, transparent, and inclusive content governance to achieve safer and more equitable online spaces for all users.
Keywords:
Authors
Danial Riazi
Department of Linguistics and Foreign Languages, Payame Noor University, Ahvaz, Iran