The Effect of De-contextualized, Semi-contextualized and Mnemonic Devices on Iranian EFL Learner’s Vocabulary Learning

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 568

This Paper With 13 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

ELSCONF03_337

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 19 اردیبهشت 1395

Abstract:

The present study was conducted to investigate the effect of three methods of vocabulary instruction (de-contextualized, semi-contextualized and mnemonic devices on Iranian EFL learner’s vocabulary learning. The participants were 100 male and female Iranian EFL learners at English language institute in Tehran and Takestan. The instruments included a 55-item Preliminary English Test (PET), and the Persian translation of an 18-item goal-orientation. The participants were divided into five groups, each group receiving one of the treatment conditions (word list, dictionary use, semantic mapping, and method of loci, story mnemonics). They were also given the pre test vocabulary, once before the treatment and once after it. The collected data were analyzed using ANOVA and Independent t-test procedure. The results of the study showed significant differences among the effects group of methods on vocabulary learning. Method of loci turned out to be more effective than other groups. However, the difference between peer and teacher-assessment in goal-orientation was not statistically significant. The findings of this study may have theoretical and pedagogical implications for learners, teachers and syllabus designers. The findings of this study may have theoretical and pedagogical implications for learners, teachers and syllabus designers.

Authors

Abbas Ali Zarei

Associate professor, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin

Maryam Taghipour

Alborz Institute of Higher Education, Qazvin

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Baumann, J.F., &Kameenui, E.J. (1991). Research on vocabulary instruction: Ode ...
  • M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson & . Barr (Eds.), ...
  • De Groot, A. M. B. (2006). Effects of stimulus characteristics ...
  • Blachowicz, C.. & Fisher, P. (2000). Vocabulary instruction. In ...
  • Folse. K. S. (2004). Vocabulary Myths. Ann Arbor, MI: University ...
  • Gere, J., Kozolvich, B. A., &Kelin, D. A. (2002). By ...
  • Holden, W. R. (1999). Learning to learn: 15 vocabulary acquisition ...
  • Hunt, A., &Beglar, D. (2005). A framework for developing EFL ...
  • Jonassen, D. H. (1993). Structural Knowledge: Techniques for Representing, Conveying, ...
  • Kasper, L. F. (1993). The keyword technique and foreign language ...
  • Krashen, S. D., and Terrell, T. D. (1983). The natural ...
  • Levin, J. R., Levin, M. E., Glasman, L. D., &Nordwall, ...
  • Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1989). Mnemonic social ...
  • Meara, P. (1995). The importance of early emphasis on L2 ...
  • Nation, I.S.P. (2004). Teaching and learning Vocabulary [M]. Beijing: Foreign ...
  • Oxford, R. &Crookall, D. (1 990) .Vocabulary learning: A Critical ...
  • Paivio, A. (1986). Mental rep resentations _ A dual coding ...
  • Qian, D. D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and ...
  • Shillaw, J. (1995). Using a word list as a focus ...
  • Soleimani, H. & Akbari, M. (2013). The Effect of storytelling ...
  • Thompson, I. (1987). Memory in language learning. In A _ ...
  • Zareva, A., S chwanenflugel, P. &Nikolova, Y. (2005). Relationship between ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع