The Impact of Cognitive Styles on the Speech Act of Apology among Iranian EFL Learners

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 153

This Paper With 19 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJREE-5-1_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 12 بهمن 1399

Abstract:

This study explored the effect of cognitive styles of field dependence (FD) and field-independence (FI) on Iranian EFL learners’ performance in the speech act of apology. Additionally, the investigation also focused on the effect of these cognitive styles on individual differences (IDs) like proficiency, age, and gender of the participants. To this end, 80 EFL learners, studying at two English language institutes in Maybod, were selected through convenient sampling. This study was conducted in three phases by using a variety of instruments, like Oxford Quick Placement Test (OPT), Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT), and Multiple Choice Discourse Completion Tasks (MCDCTs). With respect to the GEFT, students were divided into two groups, FD/FI. The MCDCTs were administered to measure students’ pragmatic comprehension and restructuring ability of the apology situations. The obtained data were analyzed using SPSS 21 statistical software. The results revealed that FI participants outperformed the FD ones in apology contexts. Individual differences like gender and age had a significant effect on the performance of the participants in both cognitive groups. Although the proficiency level demonstrated some variations, but it did not have any statistically significant impact on the performance of the participants in these two groups. The major pedagogical implication of the present study is that when assessing the interlanguage pragmatics (ILP) of EFL learners, teachers and other teaching administrations should take not only cognitive styles but also individual differences into consideration so that they could adopt and apply teaching methods in line with the learners’ various cognitive styles.  

Authors

Ashraf Maibodi

Department of English, Islamic Azad University, Maybod Branch, Yazd, Iran

Halimeh Dehghani

Department of English, Islamic Azad University, Maybod Branch, Yazd, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Afghari, A. (2007). A sociopragmatic study of apology speech act ...
  • Ahmadi, A. (2002). On the relationship between field dependence independence ...
  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment ...
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M. T. (2011). Proficiency, length of ...
  • Bayat, N. (2013). A study on the use of speech ...
  • Bergman, M. L., & Kasper, G. (1993). Perception and performance ...
  • Biook, B., & Fathi, M. (2009). The relationship between reading ...
  • Birjandi, P., & Rezaei, S. (2010). Developing a multiple-choice discourse ...
  • Bosacki, S., Innerd, W., & Towson, S. (1997). Field independence-dependence ...
  • Brown, D. (2007). Principles of language teaching and learning. White ...
  • Carroll, F., & Sapon, E. (1988). Sex differences in English ...
  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, ...
  • Davies, K. A., & Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2004). Looking back, taking ...
  • Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: ...
  • Fajen, A. (1999). Language learning strategies used by Japanese university ...
  • Fatemi, A. H., Vahedi, V. S., & Seyyedrezaie, S. Z. ...
  • Griffin, T., & Franklins, D. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve ...
  • Haji Maibodi. A. (2016). Investigating the effects of individual differences ...
  • Haji Maibodi, A., Fazilatfar, A. M., & Allami, H. (2016). ...
  • Hansen, J. R., & Stansfield, C. (1981). The relationship of ...
  • Hashemian, M., & Farhang-Ju, M. (2018). Effects of metalinguistic feedback ...
  • Hashemian, M., Jafarpour, A., & Adibpour, M. (2015). Exploring relationships ...
  • Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men, and politeness. London: Longman Group. ...
  • Holmes, J. (2008). An introduction to sociolinguistics. (3rd Ed.), (pp.164-168). ...
  • Ishihara, N., & Cohen. A. D. (2010). Learners' pragmatics: potential ...
  • Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). The role of instruction ...
  • Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage ...
  • Khalili Sabet, M., & Mohamadi, S. H. (2013). The relationship ...
  • Khodadady, E., Bagheri, N., & Charbgoo, Z. (2016). Primary school ...
  • Khodadady, E., & Zeynali, S. (2012). Field-dependence/independence cognitive style and ...
  • Kuriscak, L. (2010). The effect of individual-level variables on speech ...
  • Luk, S. C. (2002). The relationship between cognitive styles and ...
  • Marinova-Todd, S. H., Bradford, M. D., & Snow, C. E. ...
  • Nilforooshan, N., & Afghari, A. (2007). The effect of field ...
  • Reid, J. M. (2002). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. ...
  • Rickards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F., & ...
  • Rostampour, M., & Niroomand, S. M. (2014). Field dependence/independence cognitive ...
  • Sabaté i Dalmau, M., & Curelli Gotor, H. (2007). From ...
  • Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. (2006). Does field independence relate to performance ...
  • Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A (2007). Is field dependence or Independence a ...
  • Shalbafan, K. (1996). On the role field dependence/field independence in ...
  • Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive ...
  • Individual differences and development of speech act production [مقاله ژورنالی]
  • Takahashi, S. (2005). Pragmalinguistic awareness: Is it related to motivation ...
  • Tinajero, C., & Paramo, M. F. (1998). Field dependence-independence cognitive ...
  • Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints and apologies. Berlin/New ...
  • Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & ...
  • Yaghoubi, R. (1994). The relationship between field-independent/field-dependent cognitive style Persian ...
  • Afghari, A. (2007). A sociopragmatic study of apology speech act ...
  • Ahmadi, A. (2002). On the relationship between field dependence independence ...
  • Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (2010). Language assessment ...
  • Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M. T. (2011). Proficiency, length of ...
  • Bayat, N. (2013). A study on the use of speech ...
  • Bergman, M. L., & Kasper, G. (1993). Perception and performance ...
  • Biook, B., & Fathi, M. (2009). The relationship between reading ...
  • Birjandi, P., & Rezaei, S. (2010). Developing a multiple-choice discourse ...
  • Bosacki, S., Innerd, W., & Towson, S. (1997). Field independence-dependence ...
  • Brown, D. (2007). Principles of language teaching and learning. White ...
  • Carroll, F., & Sapon, E. (1988). Sex differences in English ...
  • Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, ...
  • Davies, K. A., & Skilton-Sylvester, E. (2004). Looking back, taking ...
  • Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: ...
  • Fajen, A. (1999). Language learning strategies used by Japanese university ...
  • Fatemi, A. H., Vahedi, V. S., & Seyyedrezaie, S. Z. ...
  • Griffin, T., & Franklins, D. (1996). Can strategy instruction improve ...
  • Haji Maibodi. A. (2016). Investigating the effects of individual differences ...
  • Haji Maibodi, A., Fazilatfar, A. M., & Allami, H. (2016). ...
  • Hansen, J. R., & Stansfield, C. (1981). The relationship of ...
  • Hashemian, M., & Farhang-Ju, M. (2018). Effects of metalinguistic feedback ...
  • Hashemian, M., Jafarpour, A., & Adibpour, M. (2015). Exploring relationships ...
  • Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men, and politeness. London: Longman Group. ...
  • Holmes, J. (2008). An introduction to sociolinguistics. (3rd Ed.), (pp.164-168). ...
  • Ishihara, N., & Cohen. A. D. (2010). Learners' pragmatics: potential ...
  • Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). The role of instruction ...
  • Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage ...
  • Khalili Sabet, M., & Mohamadi, S. H. (2013). The relationship ...
  • Khodadady, E., Bagheri, N., & Charbgoo, Z. (2016). Primary school ...
  • Khodadady, E., & Zeynali, S. (2012). Field-dependence/independence cognitive style and ...
  • Kuriscak, L. (2010). The effect of individual-level variables on speech ...
  • Luk, S. C. (2002). The relationship between cognitive styles and ...
  • Marinova-Todd, S. H., Bradford, M. D., & Snow, C. E. ...
  • Nilforooshan, N., & Afghari, A. (2007). The effect of field ...
  • Reid, J. M. (2002). Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom. ...
  • Rickards, J. P., Fajen, B. R., Sullivan, J. F., & ...
  • Rostampour, M., & Niroomand, S. M. (2014). Field dependence/independence cognitive ...
  • Sabaté i Dalmau, M., & Curelli Gotor, H. (2007). From ...
  • Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A. (2006). Does field independence relate to performance ...
  • Salmani-Nodoushan, M. A (2007). Is field dependence or Independence a ...
  • Shalbafan, K. (1996). On the role field dependence/field independence in ...
  • Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive ...
  • Individual differences and development of speech act production [مقاله ژورنالی]
  • Takahashi, S. (2005). Pragmalinguistic awareness: Is it related to motivation ...
  • Tinajero, C., & Paramo, M. F. (1998). Field dependence-independence cognitive ...
  • Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage pragmatics: Requests, complaints and apologies. Berlin/New ...
  • Witkin, H. A., Moore, C. A., Goodenough, D. R., & ...
  • Yaghoubi, R. (1994). The relationship between field-independent/field-dependent cognitive style Persian ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع