The Impact of Deductive, Inductive, and L۱-Based Consciousness-Raising Tasks on EFL Learners' Acquisition of the Request Speech Act

Publish Year: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 199

This Paper With 20 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-33-1_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

Abstract:

The necessity and importance of teaching pragmatics has come to light by many researchers (e.g. Rose & Kasper, ۲۰۰۱). Due to the consensus over the need to teach pragmatic competence, the main issue now centers on the question of how we should teach this competence in the most effective way. Consistent with this line of research, the present study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of deductive, inductive, and L۱-based consciousness-raising instructional tasks on EFL learners' acquisition of the request speech act during a seven-week instruction period. The results obtained through a written DCT administered to ۱۴۰ EFL learners indicated that instruction had a significantly positive effect on learners' acquisition of the request speech act. The comparison of the task types demonstrated that, all in all, the deductive task was the most effective one. Furthermore, the results showed that the learners were generally receptive to L۱-based awareness-raising tasks and that these tasks were more effective than inductive tasks. This study suggests that consciousness-raising instructional tasks could be utilized in raising students’ sociopragmatic awareness and be applied in helping them develop their interlanguage pragmatics.

Authors

Zia Tajeddin

Allameh Tabataba’i University

Rasoul Hosseinpur

Allameh Tabataba&#۰۳۹;i University

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmadi, A., Ghafar Samar, R., & Yazdanimoghaddam, M. (2011). Teaching ...
  • Alcon Soler, E. (2005). Does instruction work for learning pragmatics ...
  • Alcon Soler, E. (2007). Fostering EFL learners’ awareness of requesting ...
  • Alcon Soler, E., & Guzman, J. (2010). The effect of ...
  • Alcon Soler, E., & Martinez-Flor, A. (2008). Pragmatics in foreign ...
  • Barekat, B., & Mehri, M. (2013). Investigating the effect of ...
  • Decoo, W. (1996). The induction deduction opposition: Ambiguities and complexities ...
  • De Graaff, R. & Housen, A. (2009). Investigating the effects ...
  • Doughty, C. (2003). Instructed SLA: constraints, compensation and enhancement. In ...
  • Ellis, R.  (2002). Grammar teaching: Practice or consciousness-raising? In J. ...
  • Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford ...
  • Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2005). Raising the pragmatic awareness of language learners. ...
  • Eslami-Rasekh, Z., & Eslami-Rasekh, A. (2008). Enhancing the pragmatic competence ...
  • Eslami-Rasekh, Z., Eslami-Rasekh, A., & Fatahi, A. (2004). Using metapragmatic ...
  • Fotos, S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use ...
  • Fotos, S., & Ellis, R. (1991). Communicating about grammar: A ...
  • Fukuya, Y. J. & Hill, Y. Z. (2006). The effects ...
  • Fukuya, Y. J., & Zhang, Y. (2002). The effects of ...
  • Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008).  Second language acquisition: ...
  • Ishihara, N. (2010). Instructional pragmatics: Bridging teaching, research, and teacher ...
  • Jalilifar, A. (2009). Request strategies: Cross-sectional study of Iranian EFL ...
  •  Keshavarz, M. H., Eslami-Rasekh, Z., & Ghahraman, V. (2006). Pragmatic ...
  • Levine, G. S. (2003). Student and instructor beliefs and attitudes ...
  • Martinez-Flor, A. (2008). The effect of an Inductive-deductive teaching approach ...
  • Martinez-Flor, A. & Uso-Juan, E. (2010). The teaching of speech ...
  • Niezgoda, K. & Röver, C. (2001). Pragmatic and grammatical awareness. ...
  • Norris, J., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: ...
  • Rose, K. R. & Kasper, G. (Eds.). (2001). Pragmatics in ...
  • Safont Jordą, M. P. (2003). Instructional effects on the use ...
  • Safont Jordą, M. P. (2004). An analysis on EAP learners’ ...
  • Salazar, P. (2007). Examining mitigation in requests: A focus on ...
  • Schauer, G. A. (2009). Interlanguage pragmatic development: The study abroad ...
  • Schmidt, R.  (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial ...
  • Scutt, V. M. & Fueute, M. J. (2008). What’s the ...
  • Taguchi, N. (2006). Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act ...
  • Takahashi, S. (2001). The role of input enhancement in developing ...
  • Takahashi, S. (2005). Pragmalinguistic awareness: Is it related to motivation ...
  • Takahashi, S. (2010). Assessing learnability in second language pragmatics. In ...
  • Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback and form–meaning ...
  • Takimoto, M. (2007). The effects of referential oriented activity in ...
  • Takimoto, M. (2008). The effects of deductive and inductive instruction ...
  • Takimoto, M. (2009). The effect of input-based tasks on the ...
  • Uso-Juan, E. (2010). Requests: A sociopragmatic approach. In A. Martinez-Flor ...
  • Yu, M. (2008). Teaching and learning sociolinguistic skills in university ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع