STANCE AND ENGAGEMENT DISCOURSE MARKERS IN JOURNAL’S “AUTHOR GUIDELINES”

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 173

This Paper With 32 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-34-3_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

Abstract:

Over the past decade, there has been an increasing interest in the study of interactional metadiscourse markers in different contexts. However, not much research has been conducted about the discourse of journal author guidelines, especially the use of meta-discourse markers in this genre. Therefore, this corpus-based study had three main aims: ۱) to delve deep into the types, frequencies and functions of stance and engagement markers based on Fu’s (۲۰۱۲) interactional metadiscourse taxonomy, ۲) to compare the distribution of stance and engagement features in journal author guidelines and ۳) to investigate whether there is a significant difference between macro/micro interactional metadiscourse markers in journal author guidelines. A corpus of ۲۸۰ author guidelines produced by seven leading international academic publishers in eight academic sub-disciplines in the humanities and social sciences was compiled and analyzed. The results of the analysis showed that engagement features (reader-oriented) enjoyed higher frequency of use in journal author guidelines. Moreover, the difference between the frequency of stance and engagement features was statistically significant. Furthermore, differences reported between macro and micro interactional metadiscourse were statistically significant. The extensive use of macro interactional metadiscourse markers indicated a high degree of interactionality of journal author guidelines. The present study gives us considerable insight into the dialogic nature of a totally neglected academic genre.

Authors

raouf moini

University of Kashan

Malihe Salami

University of Kashan

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Algi, S. (2012).  Hedges and boosters in L1 and L2 ...
  • Ansarin, A. A., & Tarlani-Aliabdi, H. (2011). Reader engagement in ...
  • Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language use in professional ...
  • Biber, D., Condrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., & Helt, ...
  • Blagojević, S. (2009). Expressing attitudes in academic research articles written ...
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in ...
  • Coates, J. (1983). The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. Beckenham: ...
  • Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of ...
  • Fu, X. (2012).The use of interactional metadiscourse in job postings. ...
  • Giannoni, D. S. (2008). Popularizing features in English journal editorials. ...
  • Gillaerts, P., & Van de Velde, F. (2010). Interactional metadiscourse ...
  • Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. (2000).A modern history of written ...
  • Halliday, M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. The social interpretation ...
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Introduction to functional grammar. London: ...
  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context ...
  • Hyland, K. (2001a). Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in ...
  • Hyland, K. (2001b). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in ...
  • Hyland, K. (2002a). Directives: Power and engagement in academic writing. ...
  • Hyland, K. (2002b). What do they mean? Questions in academic ...
  • Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing. ...
  • Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring writing in interaction. London: Continuum. ...
  • Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: a model of interaction ...
  • Hyland, K. (2005c). Representing readers in writing: Student and expert ...
  • Hyland, K. (2008a). Disciplinary voices: Interaction in research writing. English ...
  • Hyland, K. (2008b). Persuasion, interaction and the construction of knowledge: ...
  • Hyland, K. & Tse, P. (2009). The leading journal in its ...
  • Kaplan, R.B. (1987). Cultural thought patterns revisited, in U. Connor ...
  • Lakoff, G. (1970). Tense and its relation to participants. Language, ...
  • Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977).The measurement of ...
  • Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ...
  • Marković, J. (2013). Engagement markers in introductory textbooks. Communication and ...
  • McGrath, L. & Kuteeva, M. (2012). Stance and engagement in ...
  • Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social interaction. Quarterly Journal ...
  • Palmer, F. (1986).Mood and Modality. London: Cambridge University Press. ...
  • Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). ...
  • Shaw, Ph. (2000). The lexis and grammar of explicit evaluation ...
  • Swales, J. M., Ahmad, U., Chang, Yu-Y., Chavez, D., Dressen, ...
  • Thompson, G. (2001). Interaction in academic writing: learning to argue ...
  • Thompson, G. & Thetela, P. (1995). The sound of one ...
  • Webber, P. (1994).The functions of questions in different medical English ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع