The Impact of Sequence Map, Answering Question, and ۳-۲-۱ Techniques on EFL Learners’ Summary Writing Ability

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 186

This Paper With 43 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JTLS-37-2_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 6 اردیبهشت 1400

Abstract:

Considering the challenges inherent in learning and teaching of summary writing in EFL/ ESL settings, it is crucial to look into various instructional techniques thoroughly. This study investigated the relative effectiveness of three summary writing techniques: Sequence map, answering question, and ۳-۲-۱ technique. To this end, ۶۰ language learners from an English language institute in Ahvaz participated in the study. Before implementing the instructional techniques, a pre-test was administered to gauge the participants' fundamental knowledge of L۲ summary writing. Three experimental groups were instructed through the already-mentioned techniques for ten weeks while the control group was given no such treatment. Finally, a post-test was administered to ascertain the effectiveness of such techniques in improving EFL learners' summary writing. The TOEFL-iBT scoring rubric was adopted to score the summaries holistically.  Paired sample t-test and ANOVA were run to analyze the data. The findings revealed that the sequence map group outperformed the other three groups in terms of the written summaries. The study further implies that the employment of graphical or spatial representation of textual concepts reduces the complexity and ambiguity of the presented information.

Authors

Rasoul Mohammad Hosseinpur

University of Qom

Reza Bagheri Nevisi

University of Qom

Saeid Bahrani

University of Qom

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Alsamadani, H. (2011). The effects of the 3-2-1 reading strategy ...
  • Anggrainy, S., Diem, C., Vianty, M. & Sugandi, B. (2016). ...
  • Armbruster, B. B., Lehr, F. & Osborn, J. (2003). Kindergarten ...
  • Ausubel, D. F. (1978). Cognitive factors in learning. New York: ...
  • Baba, K. (2009). Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries ...
  • Baxendale, B. (2003). Consistent, coherent, creative: The 3Cs of graphic ...
  • Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach ...
  • Chen, Y. S. & Su, S. W. (2012). A genre-based ...
  • Choy, S. & Lee, M. (2012). Effects of teaching paraphrasing ...
  • Conner, J. (2006). Instructional reading strategy: DR-TA (Directed Reading Thinking ...
  • Dell'Olio, J. M. & Donk, T. (2007). Advance Organizers. In ...
  • Ellis, E. (2004). Q&A: What is the big deal with ...
  • Ellis, E., & Howard, P. (2005). Graphic organizers: Power tools ...
  • Enright, M. K., Grabe, W., Koda, K., Mosenthal, P. Mulcahy-Ernt, ...
  • Franzke, M., Kintsch, E., Caccamise, D., Johnson, N., Dooley, S. ...
  • Friend, R. (2001). Effects of strategy instruction on summary writing ...
  • Grabe, W. & Jiang, X. (2007). Graphic organizers in reading ...
  • Graham, S. & Perin, D, (2007). A meta-analysis of writing ...
  • Hardy, T. (2000). Far from the madding crowd. Oxford, Oxfordshire: ...
  • Harris, K. R. & Graham, S. (2005). Writing better: Teaching ...
  • Harris, K., Graham, S., & Mason, L. (2003). Self-regulated strategy ...
  • Hemmati, F., & Bemani, S. (2013). Comparing the effect of ...
  • Hoffmann, K. F. (2010). The impact of graphic organizer and ...
  • Jensen, M. (2010). Improving reading comprehension of junior division students ...
  • Keck, C. (2006). The use of paraphrase in summary writing: ...
  • Kim, S. (2001). Characteristics of EFL readers’ summary writing: A ...
  • Lee, L. (2010). Exploring wiki-mediated collaborative writing: A case study ...
  • Lehr, F., & Osborn, J. (2005). A focus on comprehension.  ...
  • Lin, O. P. & Maroof, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in ...
  • Marlini, L. (2015). Teaching reading comprehension by using 3-2-1 strategy ...
  • McDonough, K., Crawford, W.J., & De Vleeschauwer, J., (2014). Summary ...
  • McElroy, L. & Coughlin, C. (2010). The other side of ...
  • Melton, J. (2003). Summarizing strategies strengthen learning. Retrieved from http://www.kidbibs.com/learningtips/1t33.htm ...
  • Mohammad Hosseinpur, R. (2015). The impact of teaching summarizing on ...
  • Okebukola, F. & Owolabi, T. (2007). The efficacy of question-answer-relationships ...
  • Otero, R. C. (2008). Summary of integration information processes form ...
  • Peng, R. G. S., Hoon, T. L., Khoo, S. F., ...
  • Preszler, J. (2006). More strategy to guide learning. Rapid City ...
  • Quick Oxford Placement Test (2001). Quick placement test. London: Oxford ...
  • Raphael, T. (1986). Teaching question-answer relationships revisited. The Reading Teacher, ...
  • Raphael, T. E., & Au, K. (2005). QAR: Enhancing comprehension ...
  • Rini, K., Sada, C. & Salma, U. (2014). Using the ...
  • Robinson, D. H., Corliss, S. B., Bush, A. M., Bena, ...
  • Stafford, T. (2012). The effect of question-answer relationships on ninth-grade ...
  • Stull, A. T. & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Learning by ...
  • Tayib, A. (2015). The effect of using graphic organizers on ...
  • Wade-Stein, D., & Kintsch, E. (2004). Summary street: interactive computer ...
  • Wichadee, S. (2013). Improving students’ summary writing ability through collaboration: ...
  • Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., Lauer, K. D., Stafford, ...
  • Zygouris-Coe, V., Wiggins, M. B., & Smith, L.H. (2004). Engaging ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع