A Two Question Screen for Mental Health Opportunities
Publish place: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery، Vol: 9، Issue: 3
Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 217
This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_TABO-9-3_013
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 18 اردیبهشت 1400
Abstract:
Background: Shortened versions of validated PRO measures of coping strategies e.g. PSEQ-۲, may facilitatescreening and monitoring of psychological conditions such as depression and anxiety. The primary researchquestion in this study assesses the sensitivity and specificity of a PSEQ-۲ score of less than ۱۰ for importantsymptoms of depression (a PHQ-۲ score greater than ۲), anxiety (GAD-۲ score greater than ۲), any impactfulprior episode of psychological trauma, and QuickDASH greater than ۴۹. Secondarily we assess the associationsbetween self-efficacy and other demographic and psychological factors on the magnitude of limitations and painintensity.Methods: We performed a retrospective PRO evaluation in ۹۲۶ adult patients attending upper extremity clinicbetween ۱st January ۲۰۱۸ and ۳۱st January ۲۰۱۹. Demographic factors were assessed using electronic medicalrecords and PRO data using an online platform. Patients included ۵۵۶ (۶۰%) women, ۳۷۰ (۴۰%) men (mean ۵۱years + ۱۴ (range, ۱۹-۸۸), mostly (n=۵۸۴, ۶۳%) with safety net insurance.Results: A PSEQ-۲ scoring threshold of less than ۱۰ was ۸۱% sensitive for a PHQ-۲ score of ۳ or greater, ۸۴%sensitive for a GAD-۲ score of ۳ or greater, ۸۴% sensitive for one or more important psychological traumas, and ۸۲%sensitive for a QuickDASH of ۵۰ or greater. PSEQ-۲ less than ۱۰ was independently associated with greater upperextremity limitations (β=۱۱ [۶.۳ to ۱۷, ۹۵% Confidence interval [C.I], p <۰.۰۰۱) and pain intensity (β=۰.۹۲ (۰.۳۱ to ۱.۵,۹۵% C.I) P=۰.۰۰۳) amongst other psychological and demographic factors.Conclusion: A PSEQ-۲ score less than ۱۰ might, along with verbal and non-verbal signs of distress, be a usefulway to introduce the use of more sensitive screening questionnaires about anxiety or depression, or open up the option of speaking directly to mental or social health professionals. Future studies are required to test thishypothesis. Level of evidence: III
Keywords:
Authors
Prakash Jayakumar
UK Harkness Fellowship in Health Care Policy and Practice Innovations, The Value Institute / Department of Surgery and Peri-operative Care, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
Joost T.P. Kortlever
Department of Surgery and Peri-operative Care, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
Laura E. Brown
Center for Health Communication, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA
David Ring
Department of Surgery and Peri-operative Care, The University of Texas at Austin, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA