سیویلیکا را در شبکه های اجتماعی دنبال نمایید.

Al-Ghazali’s Compatibility with the Philosophers and the Influence of Sufism

Publish Year: 1399
Type: Journal paper
Language: English
View: 245

This Paper With 19 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Export:

Link to this Paper:

Document National Code:

JR_RIURD-9-17_003

Index date: 26 July 2021

Al-Ghazali’s Compatibility with the Philosophers and the Influence of Sufism abstract

Sufism greatly influenced the ethical beliefs and values of al-Ghazali. Had it not been for that influence, his works would have lacked their special spiritual value. In this paper, I will examine the role that Sufi philosophy played in giving spiritual depth to the ethics of al-Ghazali and how he was ultimately drawn to Sufism. Al-Ghazali moved away from his focus on the law and realized the value of spirituality. I will also argue why Socrates and Plato’s beliefs are not at odds with Sufism and thus with al-Ghazali’s views. In his The Incoherence of the Philosophers, al-Ghazali attacks the philosophers including Ibn Sina and al-Farabi, but these two men laid the groundwork for Sufi philosophy. So, in reality, al-Ghazali should have sided with Ibn Sina and al-Farabi rather than opposing them. Neo-Platonism influenced Sufi philosophy, and since al-Ghazali was influenced by Sufi philosophy, he must not have been at odds with the Muslim Neo-Platonists.

Al-Ghazali’s Compatibility with the Philosophers and the Influence of Sufism Keywords:

Al-Ghazali’s Compatibility with the Philosophers and the Influence of Sufism authors

Nazanin Kianifard

PhD candidate, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
Abul Quasem, Muhammad. ۱۹۷۵. The Ethics of al-Ghazali: A Composite ...
Allen, Colin,and Cecile Jagodzinski. ۲۰۱۲. “Plotinus.” Accessed December ۱۰, ۲۰۱۲. ...
Azadpur, Mohammad. ۲۰۱۱. Reason Unbound: On Spiritual Practice in Islamic ...
Ceylan, Yasin. ۱۹۹۵. “Al Ghazali between Philosophy and Sufism.” The ...
Dhanani, Alnoor. ۲۰۰۷. “Fārābī: Abū Naṣr Muḥammad ibn Muḥammad ibn ...
Fakhry, Majid. ۱۹۹۴. Ethical Theories in Islam. Leiden: E.J. Brill ...
Ghazali, Muhammad al-. ۱۹۶۳. Tahafut al-falasifa (The Incoherence of the ...
Hourani, George F., trans. ۱۹۷۶. Averroes, On the Harmony of Religion ...
Jackson, Sherman. ۲۰۰۲. On the Boundaries of Theological Tolerance in ...
Moris, Megawati. ۲۰۱۲. “Sufism and Philosophy: The Historical Interaction between ...
Nasr, Seyyed Hossein. ۲۰۰۶. Islamic Philosophy from Its Origin to ...
Netton, Ian Richard. ۱۹۹۸. “Neoplatonism in Islamic Philosophy.” In Routledge ...
Peters, F. E. ۱۹۹۰. Judaism, Christianity, and Islam: The Classical ...
Rafiabadi, Hamid Naseem, and Aadil Amin Kak, trans. ۲۰۰۳. The ...
Rahman, Fazlur. ۱۹۷۰. “Islamic Modernism: Its Scope, Method and Alternatives.” ...
Wensinck, A. J. ۱۹۴۱. Ghazali’s Mishkat al-anwar (Niche of Lights). ...
نمایش کامل مراجع