Presenting a Method for Evaluating the Safety Risk Management Process in Industries Using Fuzzy Logic Approach

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 269

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

این Paper در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_AOH-5-2_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 مرداد 1400

Abstract:

Background: An effective process for preventing industrial accidents basically requires a thorough study of the environment, data collection, evaluation, and analysis of this information, determination of corrective action, and its implementation. Risk management provides an integrated framework for this important process. The purpose of this study was to identify the parameters of the risk management process, combine these parameters by fuzzy logic and construct a fuzzy model to obtain the risk management index and finally design a questionnaire with Likert scale to obtain the inputs of this model to evaluate the risk management process. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in ۲۰۱۸ in Tehran. First, based on library studies and expertschr('۳۹') opinions, Jaques non-linear crisis management model was selected, and based on this model, the parameters of the risk management process were extracted. Then, a questionnaire with ۲۲ questions was designed to measure these parameters, the content and face validity of which were evaluated. Also, to evaluate the reliability of the questionnaire, the test-retest method and Cronbachchr('۳۹')s alpha coefficient were used. Then the parameters were defined as fuzzy numbers, the Fuzzy inference engine was programmed using fuzzy rules, and its validity was evaluated. Results: The fuzzy model has three stages, in each of which sixteen rules are used. In this fuzzy model, the defuzzification step was performed by four methods with the same results. The designed questionnaire contains twenty-two questions, the content validity ratio (CVR) for this questionnaire is ۰.۸۹, and the content validity index (CVI) for all questions was above ۰.۷۹. Cronbachchr('۳۹')s alpha coefficient for this questionnaire was ۰.۷۱۳. Face validity was determined quantitatively by calculating the impact score (more than ۱.۵). Using intraclass correlation coefficient and Pearson correlation coefficient, the existence of reliability between test times (test-retest) was confirmed, so that their values were ۰.۸۴ and ۰.۸۸%, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed fuzzy model has a high validity giving a correct evaluation of the risk management process and expressing the final result in the form of an index between zero and one hundred. The risk management process evaluation questionnaire has good validity and reliability with the interpretation that the item has good face validity and is understandable, simple, and fluent for the sample group. Using this tool, industry managers can evaluate the safety risk management process, making them able to identify the strengths and weaknesses of this process, and finally take steps to eliminate the defects and improve this process continuously.

Authors

حمیدرضا مهری

Instructor, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, Bojnurd, Iran

فائزه سپاهی زوارم

MSc, Occupational Health Research Center, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

علی کریمی

Department of Occupational health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

فریده گلبابایی

Department of Occupational health, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Bedell D. Taking risk beyond regulation. Global finance. ۲۰۰۷;۲۱(۶):۵۸-۶۰ ...
  • Salen W. Risk management continues to gain international focus. Professional ...
  • Rawls III SW, Smithson CW. Strategic risk management. Applied corporate ...
  • ISO I. Risk management–principles and guidelines. International Organization for Standardization, ...
  • Khan FI, Haddara MR. Risk-based maintenance of ethylene oxide production ...
  • Aquila A. Best practices in risk management for firms. Accounting ...
  • Atkinson A. Risk management and Monte Carlo simulation: an illustration ...
  • Feinberg P. Importance of risk management stressed. Pensions &investments. ۱۹۹۹;۲۷(۱۳):۴۸ ...
  • Mehri H, Karimi A, Golbabaei F, SepahiZoeram F. The systematic ...
  • Stripling TE. Success requires embracing systematic risk management. Pipe line ...
  • Raz T, Michael E. Use and benefits of tools for ...
  • Ceniceros R. ERM growth rate slows, interest remains strong. Business ...
  • Kutsch E, Hall M. Deliberate ignorance in project risk management. ...
  • Lifang X, Jun L. Case study on project risk management ...
  • Letens G, Van Nuffel L, Heene A, Leysen J. Towards ...
  • Gogin C, Johnson D. Stay focused on the intent. Accountancy. ...
  • Vose D. Quantitative risk analysis: a guide to Monte Carlo ...
  • Lee J, Chun J. Risk response analysis model for construction ...
  • Stoneburner G, Goguen AY, Feringa A. Risk management guide for ...
  • Jaques T. Issue management and crisis management: An integrated, non-linear, ...
  • Goguen J. LA Zadeh. Fuzzy sets. Information and control, vol. ...
  • Mamdani EH. Application of fuzzy algorithms for control of simple ...
  • Amindoust A, Ahmed S, Saghafinia A, Bahreininejad A. Sustainable supplier ...
  • Sivanandam S, Sumathi S, Deepa S. Introduction to fuzzy logic ...
  • Ordoobadi SM. Development of a supplier selection model using fuzzy ...
  • Safety CfCP. Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety: John Wiley ...
  • Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an ...
  • Gliem JA, Gliem RR. Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha ...
  • Kash TJ, Darling JR. Crisis management: prevention, diagnosis and intervention. ...
  • De Lemos T, Betts M, Eaton D, de Almeida LT. ...
  • Roth J, Espersen D. Risk reflections: based on his extensive ...
  • Stosic B, Mihic M, Milutinovic R, Isljamovic S. Risk identification ...
  • Simpleman L, McMahon P, Bahnmaier B, Evans K, Lloyd J. ...
  • Christensen WC. Safe Designs: A Challenge to SH&E Professionals. Professional ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع