Effects of Receiving Corrective Feedback through Online Chats and Class Discussions on Iranian EFL Learners' Writing Quality

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 270

This Paper With 12 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JFL-9-34_012

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 9 مرداد 1400

Abstract:

Giving corrective feedback (CF) is an essential part of the teaching and learning process, and the way it should beneficially be done has been the focus of attention for numerous researchers especially when traditional ways of CF provision are not possible, particularly in rare situations such as outbreaks of diseases. This study investigated how different ways of giving feedback; namely, through online chats and class discussions can help language learners in benefitting from their instructors’ CF provision. To this purpose, the effects of two ways of feedback provision were tested on the participants writing quality. Three hundred and seventeen Iranian EFL learners took a TOEFL test, ۱۳۲ of them (۵۳ males and ۷۹ females) scoring between ۴۷۷ and ۵۱۰ were asked to deliver a ۲۰۰-word writing task. Then, they were randomly put into ۴ experimental and control groups to undergo different treatments, i.e. receiving CF through online chats and class discussions for ۱۰ one-hour sessions. After the treatment, they were required to deliver another ۲۰۰-word piece of writing. The results of statistical data analysis showed that the writing quality of the participants receiving CF through online chats was significantly higher than that of those who received CF through class discussions. The findings of this research have practical implications for Iranian educational system to update its instructional methods and for the nature of teaching and learning processes and practices.

Authors

Sahar Farrahi Avval

Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran

Hassan Asadollahfam

Bonab Branch, Islamic Azad University, Bonab, Iran

Bahram Behin

English Department, Shahid Madani University, Tabriz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Abrams, Z. I. (۲۰۰۲). Surfing to cross‐cultural awareness: Using internet‐mediated ...
  • Banaruee, H. and A. Askari (۲۰۱۶). Typology of corrective feedback ...
  • Bataineh, M. Z. (۲۰۱۴). A review of factors associated with ...
  • Biria, R., & Jafari, S. (۲۰۱۳). The Impact of Collaborative ...
  • Chaudron, C. (۱۹۷۷). Teachers' Priorities in Correcting Learners' Errors in ...
  • Chaudron, C. (۱۹۸۸). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and ...
  • Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (۲۰۱۶). EFL learners’ ...
  • Chun, A. E., Day, R. R., Chenoweth, N. A., & ...
  • Day, R. R., Chenoweth, N. A., Chun, A. E., & ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۳). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University ...
  • Ge, G. (۲۰۰۵). A strategic approach to teaching English writing. ...
  • Recast and Explicit Feedback to Young Language Learners: Impacts on Grammar Uptake and Willingness to Communicate [مقاله ژورنالی]
  • Hertel, T. J. (۲۰۰۳). Using an e‐mail exchange to promote ...
  • Kerwin, D. (۲۰۱۲). The impact of digital and computer mediated ...
  • Koosha, M., & Yakhabi, M. (۲۰۱۳). Problems associated with the ...
  • Lyster, R. (۱۹۹۸). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction ...
  • Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (۱۹۹۷). Corrective feedback and learner ...
  • Rassaei, E. (۲۰۱۷). Video chat vs. face-to-face recasts, learners’ interpretations ...
  • Ruegg, R. (۲۰۱۰). Who wants feedback and does it make ...
  • Ruegg, R. (۲۰۱۷). Learner revision practices and perceptions of peer ...
  • Ruegg, R. (۲۰۱۸). The effect of peer and teacher feedback ...
  • Salaberry, M. R. (۲۰۰۱). The use of technology for second ...
  • Sheen, Y. (۲۰۰۶). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts ...
  • Warschauer, M. (۱۹۹۵). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the ...
  • Weininger, M. J., & Shield, L. (۲۰۰۳). Promoting oral production ...
  • Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y. (۱۹۹۸). Second ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع