سیویلیکا را در شبکه های اجتماعی دنبال نمایید.

Face-Threatening Aspect of Refusal Speech Acts: A Contrastive Study

Publish Year: 1394
Type: Journal paper
Language: English
View: 214

This Paper With 12 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Export:

Link to this Paper:

Document National Code:

JR_JMRELS-2-1_004

Index date: 4 September 2021

Face-Threatening Aspect of Refusal Speech Acts: A Contrastive Study abstract

Professionalism in communication is a matter of concern for speakers of all languages. Awareness about some features such as face-threatening property of refusal speech acts leads language users to apply some specific linguistic forms. Considering the significance of cultural and social variations in performing refusal speech acts and the importance of preserving “face”, this study tried to find differences between native-Persian and English speakers. To collect the data, 60 native Persian and English speakers were asked to complete a two-phase questionnaire, a discourse completions test (DCT) and a self-report, including four different situations and Beebe's classification of refusals, was used. Great tendency toward using indirect forms between both Persian and English participants was taken as an indicator of noticeable consideration of face-preserving in refusals, although Persian speakers seemed more concerned about it. The differences between two groups of participants were inferred as cultural variations’ reflection. Some implications for language teaching were discussed.  

Face-Threatening Aspect of Refusal Speech Acts: A Contrastive Study Keywords:

Face-Threatening Aspect of Refusal Speech Acts: A Contrastive Study authors

Nargol Mokhtari

Islamic Azad University, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
Allami, H., & Naeimi A. (۲۰۱۱). A cross-linguistic study of ...
Austin, J. (۱۹۷۵). How to do things with words. Oxford: ...
Barron, A. (۲۰۰۳). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to ...
Brown, P., & Levinson S. C. (۱۹۸۷). Politeness: Some universals ...
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (۱۹۷۸). Universals in language ...
Cohen, A. D. (۱۹۹۶). Developing the ability to perform speech ...
Eslami, Z. R. (۲۰۱۰). Refusals: How to develop appropriate refusal ...
Ghazanfari, M., Bonyadi, A., & Malekzadeh, S. (۲۰۱۳). Investigating cross-linguistic ...
Hassani, R., Mardani, M., & Hossein, H. (۲۰۱۱). A comparative ...
Hudson, G. (۲۰۰۰). Essential introductory linguistics. Massachusetts: Blackwell ...
Kazemi-Gol, N. (۲۰۱۳). A contrastive study of the speech act ...
Nunan, D. (۲۰۰۱). Aspects of task-based syllabus design. Oxford: Oxford ...
Salazar Campillo, P., Safort-Jordá, M. P., & Codina-Espurz, V. (۲۰۰۹). ...
Searle, J. R. (۱۹۶۹). Speech acts: An essay in the ...
Siebold, K., & Busch, H. (۲۰۱۵). No need for clarity: ...
Searle, J. R. (۱۹۷۶). A classification of illocutionary acts. Language ...
Tanck, S. (۲۰۱۳). Speech act sets of refusal and complaint: ...
Thomas, J. (۱۹۹۵). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. ...
Vaezi, R. (۲۰۱۱). A contrastive study of the speech act ...
Zhang, W. (۲۰۱۲). Not just a “bu”: Perception and production ...
نمایش کامل مراجع