uncertain criteria in ranking inter-basin water transfer projects in iran

Publish Year: 1384
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 1,053

This Paper With 9 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

SUADE01_032

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 15 آبان 1390

Abstract:

Iran is an arid and semi-arid country. By the year, 2025 Iran will fall in the category of countries with critical water scarcity. The uneven distribution of water and growth of population have led to the present water shortages in major parts of the country. Since the center and Southeast of the country is facing with high water shortage, an important way to solve the problems of those parts and improve the socio-economic life of the people is inter-basin water transfer. The choice among alternative inter-basin water transfer projects is generally based on the fundamental objective of cost minimization. There is, however, a need to consider sustainability; the technical, environment and social implications in integrated water resources planning, in addition to economics. Decision making in this environment needs a hierarchy of criteria and a multi- criteria decision making model. Various uncertainties appear in assumptions, information, parameters and commentary of these models. It increases complexity of models. Also sensitivity analysis (Simulation) could not satisfy modeling uncertainties. Again traditional MCDM methods couldn’t include linguistic uncertainties (as low, high, etc.). Solution way is using Fuzzy MCDM tools. This study first investigated criteria of other countries for assessment water development projects and then national acts of Iran. The experts constructed the hierarchy of criteria after negotiation and revision. Very uncertain criteria will arise by using this hierarchy, and this paper will discuss these uncertain criteria in a case study

Authors

M. ZARGHAAMI

Corresponding Expert, Mahab Ghodss consulting Engineers, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Aravossis K., Anagno stopoulo S, P., Koungolos, A., Vliamos, S. ...
  • Ardakanian, R., Zarghaami, M. (2004), "Sustainability criteria for ranking of ...
  • ASCE Task Committee _ Sustainability Criteria, (1998), Sustainability Criteria for ...
  • Chen, S.J., Hwang, C.L. (1991), "Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making", ...
  • GWP, Global Water Partnership (2000), "Integrated water resources management', TAC ...
  • Jamab, (Jamab Consulting Engineers), National Water Master Plan, Water Resources ...
  • Keeney, R., Raiffa, H. (1976), Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences ...
  • Lund, J.R, and Israel, M. (1995), "Optimization of transfers in ...
  • MG, Mahab Ghods Consulting Engineers, Inter-basin Water Transfer Proposal from ...
  • MG, Mahab Ghodss Consulting Engineers, Ranking National Water Resources Projects ...
  • Mousseau, V., Figueira, J., Dias, L, Gomes da Silva, C., ...
  • Netto, C.O., Parent, E., Duckstein, L. (1996), "Multicriterion design of ...
  • aid and decision making, in Bana et Costa C. readings ...
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New ...
  • Simonovic S., Fahmy H. And Shorbagy, A. (1997), _ use ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع