Development and validation of Midwifery Vocational Perception Scale

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 184

This Paper With 9 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JMREH-9-4_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 11 مهر 1400

Abstract:

Background & aim: Vocation perception of midwives is important in terms of their sense and level of professionalism. The  purpose of this study was to develop and validate Midwifery Vocational Perception Scale.Methods: This validation study was carried out at five public hospitals located in Istanbul, Turkey from October ۱st to December ۳۰th, ۲۰۱۹. In the first stage, ۶۸ items draft form was prepared. After receiving the opinion of seven experts, the face validity of the scale was tested with ۲۰ midwives. In the second stage, the ۵-point ۵۲-item Likert scale was administered to ۲۸۲ midwives. However, since the outliers were deleted before the factor analysis, the analysis was performed for only the data of ۲۳۲ people. Factor and confirmatory analyses and the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient were used to analyze the scale validity and reliability.Results: According to the exploratory factor analysis, the scale consisted of ۱۶ items and three factors that explained ۵۳.۰۸۵% of the the scale variance.  Confirmatory factor analysis fit index results were found as CMIN=۱۷۵,۴۲۷, DF=۹۷, p<۰.۰۰۱, CMIN/DF=۱.۸۰۹, RMSEA=۰.۰۵۹, CFI=۰.۹۳۳, GFI= ۰.۹۱۶. The Cronbach’s alpha value of scale was determined to be ۰.۸۶۵. The lowest anyone scored was ۱۶, the highest was ۸۰, while  the mean score was ۸۷.۷۱ ±۷.۴۶ (min: ۶۷, max: ۹۵).Conclusion: A high score indicates positive vocational perception and occupational opinions in midwifery, while a low score indicates negative vocational perception and occupational opinions. The Midwifery vocational Perception Scale was prepared in Turkish and a validity study in other cultures is recommended.

Authors

Zümrüt Bilgin

Lecturer, Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Health Science, Marmara University, Istanbul/Turkey

Yeliz Doğan Merih

Lecturer, Health Sciences University, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing/Turkey Health Institutes Presidency, Istanbul /Turkey

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • International Confederation of Midwives (ICM). Definition of midwife. Available from ...
  • Taşkın Yılmaz Şen TH, Demirkaya F. Hemşirelerin ve Ebelerin Mesleklerini ...
  • Yıldırım G, Koçkanat P, Duran Ö. Ulusal ebelik kodları ve ...
  • Halldorsdottir S, Karlsdottir SI. The primacy of the good midwife ...
  • Demirbaş Meydan Ş, Kaya N. Ebelerin profesyonel değerleri ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ...
  • World Health Organization (WHO). International day of the midwife ۲۰۱۸. ...
  • Adegoke AA, Atiyaye FB, Abubakar AS, Auta A, Aboda A. ...
  • Warmelink JC, Hoijtink K, Noppers M, Wiegers TA, de Cock ...
  • Davis LL. Instrument review: getting the most from a panel ...
  • Taherdoost H. Measurement and scaling techniques in research methodology; survey/ ...
  • Tezbaşaran A. Likert Tipi Ölçek Hazırlama Kılavuzu. Türk Psikologlar Derneği ...
  • Sireci S, Faulkner-Bond M.Validity evidence based on test content. Psicothema. ...
  • DeVellis RF. Scale Development: Theory and Applications. ۲۶th ed. California: ...
  • Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, MacCallum RC, Strahan EJ. Evaluating the ...
  • Miller RL, Acton C, Fullerton DA, Maltby J. SPSS for ...
  • Ragab M, Arisha A. Research methodology in business: a starter’s ...
  • Lipovetsky S. Factor analysis by limited scales: which factors to ...
  • Wong KL, Ong SF, Kuek TY. Constructing a survey questionnaire ...
  • Çapık C. Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarında doğrulayıcı faktör analizinin kullanımı ...
  • Devlieger I, Rosseel Y. Factor score path analysis. Methodology. ۲۰۱۷; ...
  • Taber KS. The use of cronbach’s alpha when developing and ...
  • Tavakol M, Dennick R. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International ...
  • Heale R, Twycross A. Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. ...
  • Thompson BL, Green SB, Yang Y. Assessment of the maximal ...
  • Perinetti G. Sta tips part IV: Selection, interpretation and reporting ...
  • Watson R, Thompson DR. Use of factor analysis in journal ...
  • Watkins MW. Exploratory factor analysis: a guide to best practice. ...
  • Cronbach LJ, Shavelson My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and ...
  • Choi J, Peters M, Mueller RO. Correlation analysis of ordinal ...
  • Louangrath PI, Sutanapong C. Validity and reliability of survey scales. ...
  • Straussi ME, Smith GT. Construct validity: advances in theory and ...
  • Levett-Jones T, Lathlean J, Higgins I, McMillan M. Development and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع