The Effects of Task Focus and Involvement Load on Idioms Recognition

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 292

This Paper With 23 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JMRELS-8-4_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 آذر 1400

Abstract:

This study investigated the effects of form-focused and meaning-focused tasks with different involvement load indices on EFL learners' recognition of L۲ idioms. To this end, a sample of ۱۸۰ EFL learners (both male and female) in two language institutes was selected and randomly assigned into six groups. Form-focused tasks with involvement load ۲ (Multiple-choice), ۳ (Sentence-completion), ۴ (Sentence-making) were used for three experimental groups, while meaning-focused tasks with involvement load ۲ (Summary-writing), ۳ (Writing with glossary), and ۴ (Writing without glossary) were utilized for the other three groups. After the treatment, a ۳۰-item test in multiple-choice format was administered to assess the participants' recognition of idioms. One two-way ANOVA and a series of independent-samples t-tests were run to process the collected data. The results indicated that the tasks with higher levels of involvement load were more effective on recognition of idioms. The results also showed that form-focused tasks were more efficient than meaning-focused tasks. Moreover, at involvement load of two, meaning-focused tasks were more beneficial than form-focused tasks, while form-focused tasks were more effective at higher involvement loads of three and four. The results of this study can have theoretical and pedagogical implications for language teachers, curriculum designers, and researchers.

Authors

Maryam Mousavi

Department of English,Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University,

Abbas Ali Zarei

Imam Khomeini International University

Saeideh Ahangari

Department of English, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Asadzadeh Maleki, N. (۲۰۱۲). The effect of the involvement load hypothesis on improving ...
  • Amini, A., & Maftoon, P. (۲۰۱۷). The impact of skill ...
  • Alavinia, P. & Rahimi, H. (۲۰۱۹). Task types effects and ...
  • Arnon, I., & Snider, N. (۲۰۱۰). More than words: Frequency ...
  • Birjandi, P., Alavi, S. M., & NajafiKarimi, S. (۲۰۱۵). Effects ...
  • Boers, F., Demecheleer, M., He, L., Deconinck, J., Stengers, H., ...
  • Boostan Saadi, S., & Saeidi, M. (۲۰۱۸). The effect of ...
  • Celik, B. (۲۰۱۹). A comparison of form-focused and meaning-focused instruction ...
  • Cook, P., Fazly, A., Stevenson, S. (۲۰۰۸). Unsupervised type and ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۳). Designing a task-based syllabus. RELC Journal, ۳۴(۱), ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۱۵). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford University Press ...
  • Folse, K. S. (۲۰۰۶). The effect of type of written ...
  • Golshan, M. (۲۰۱۵). Task-based language teaching and focus on form. ...
  • Grant, L., & Bauer, L. (۲۰۰۴). Criteria for re-defining idioms: ...
  • Haward, J. (۱۹۹۸). Idioms in American life. Prentice-Hal, Inc ...
  • Hazrat, M. (۲۰۱۵). The effects of task type and task ...
  • Irujo, S. (۱۹۸۶). Don’t put your leg in your mouth: ...
  • Krashen, S. D. (۱۹۸۵). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. ...
  • Kim, Y. (۲۰۱۱). The role of task-induced involvement and learner ...
  • Kang, D. (۲۰۲۰). The effects of task-Induced involvement on L۲ ...
  • Kaivanpanah, S., Alavi, M., & Ravandpour, A. (۲۰۲۰). The effect ...
  • Kıvrak, C., & UygunGökmen, D. (۲۰۱۹). The effects of task-induced ...
  • Long, M. (۱۹۸۵). A role for instruction in second language ...
  • Liu, D. (۲۰۰۳). The most frequently used spoken American English ...
  • Lan, Y., & Wu, M. (۲۰۱۳). Application of form-focused instruction ...
  • Lee, J. (۲۰۱۹). Task complexity, cognitive load, and first language ...
  • Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (۲۰۰۸). Form-focused instruction in second ...
  • Laufer, B., &Hulstijn, J. (۲۰۰۱). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a ...
  • Hulstijn, J. H., &Laufer, B. (۲۰۰۱). Some empirical evidence for ...
  • McCarthy, M., & O'Dell, F. (۲۰۱۷). English idioms in use. ...
  • Moslehi, M., &Rahimy, R. (۲۰۱۸). The effect of role-play through ...
  • Namaziandost, E., Hosseini, E., & Utomo, D. (۲۰۲۰). A comparative ...
  • Noroozi, M., & Siyyari, M. (۲۰۱۹). Meaning-focused output and meaning-focused ...
  • Naserpour, A., Zarei, A. A., & Esfandiari. R. (۲۰۱۳). The ...
  • Prabhu, N. S. (۱۹۸۷). Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press ...
  • Rahmani, R., Jafari, S., & Izadpanah, S. (۲۰۱۸). The effect ...
  • Pishghadam, R., Khodadady, E., & Daliry Rad, N. (۲۰۱۱). The ...
  • Schmidt, R. W. (۱۹۹۰). The role of consciousness in second ...
  • Swain, M. (۲۰۰۰). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition ...
  • Sarbazi, M. (۲۰۱۴). Involvement load hypothesis: Recalling unfamiliar words meaning ...
  • Saslow, J., & Ascher A. (۲۰۱۱). Top notch. Pearson Education, ...
  • Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (۲۰۰۸). Form-focused instruction: Isolated ...
  • Simpson, R., & Mendis, D. (۲۰۰۳). A corpus-based study of ...
  • Soleimani, H., & Rostami Abu Saeedi, A. A. (۲۰۱۶). The ...
  • Saeidi, M., Zaferanieh, E., & Shatery, H. (۲۰۱۲). On the ...
  • Tahmasbi, M, & Farvardin, M. (۲۰۱۷). Probing the Effects of ...
  • Yagubi, B., Rayati, R. A., & AllemzadeGorji, N. (۲۰۱۰). The ...
  • Zou, D. (۲۰۱۷). Vocabulary acquisition through cloze exercises, sentence-writing and ...
  • Zarei, A, A. (۲۰۲۰). L۲ idioms: On the effectiveness of ...
  • Zarei, A. A., & Moftakhari Rezaei, G. (۲۰۱۶). The effect ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع