The Efficacy of Two Teaching Methods on Minimizing the Grammatical Errors in Translating Persian Sentences into English

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 209

This Paper With 20 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_CLCS-3-2_014

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 دی 1400

Abstract:

This study deals with spotting the grammatical errors committed by the Iranian students majoring in English translation while translating the Persian sentences into English and investigating the effect of two teaching methods, including Grammar-Translation Method (GTM) and Communicative Language Teaching Method (CLT), on minimizing these errors. For this purpose, the grammatical errors in the translation of thirty students were identified. These errors were analyzed and classified according to Keshavarz’s model of error analysis.  The students were divided into two groups; the first group received the learning materials based on GTM, and in the second group CLT was applied. Afterward, a test which included English sentences extracted from Modern English ۱ and ۲ was designed based on the errors taken from the corpus compiled by the students’ translations. Then the frequency of the errors in both groups were analyzed by SPSS software to determine the significance of using these methods on minimizing the grammatical errors made by the students in their translations into English. To determine the level of significance, the probability value was calculated for raw errors, GTM and CLT errors. The analysis of Pearson correlation showed that both methods had their significance; however, the communicative method proved to be slightly more effective than the other. Undoubtedly, this does not mean to underestimate the efficacy of grammar translation method since it seems that it plays a complementary role in teaching environment, and achieving better pedagogical results cannot be prescribed on a single method.

Authors

Mostafa Bahraman

Kashmar Higher Education Institute, Kashmar, Iran

Roya Movahed

Kashmar Higher Education Institute, Kashmar, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Bond, Francis. Determiners and Number in English Contrasted with Japanese, ...
  • Corder, Stephen. Introducing Applied Linguistics. Baltimore: Penguin Education, ۱۹۷۳ ...
  • Crystal, David. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics ۶th Edition. ...
  • Dulay, Heidi, Marine Burt, and Stephen Krashen. Language Two. New ...
  • Frank, Marcella. Modern English, Part of Speech. Prentice Hall, ۱۹۷۲ ...
  • Modern English, Sentences and Complex Structures. Prentice Hall, ۱۹۷۲ ...
  • Haspelmath, Martin, and Andrea D Sims. Understanding Morphology. New York, ...
  • Heydari, Pooneh, and Mohammad Bagheri. “Error Analysis: Sources of L۲ ...
  • Ilani, Ali, and Hossein Barati. “Translation of journalist texts in ...
  • Kaweera, Chittima. “Writing Error: A Review of Interlingual and Intralingual ...
  • Keshavarz, Mohammad Hossein. Error Analysis: A Practical Course for English ...
  • Keshavarz, Mohammad Hossein. Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Tehran: ...
  • Khansir, Ali Akbar. “Error Analysis and Second Language Writing.” Theory ...
  • Kroeger, Paul R. Analyzing Grammar: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University ...
  • Liu, Meihua, and Ying Xu. “An Investigation of Syntactic Errors ...
  • Meyer, Charles F. Introducing English Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, ۲۰۰۹Mitchell, ...
  • Pavey, Emma L. The Structure of Language: An Introduction to ...
  • Phuket, Pimpisa Rattanadilok Na, and Normah Binti Othman. “Understanding Efl ...
  • Presada, Diana, and Mihaela Badea. “The Effectiveness of Error Analysis ...
  • Radford, Andrew, Martin Atkinson, David Britain, Harald Clahsen and Andrew ...
  • Richards, Jack C. “A Non-Contrastive Approach to Error Analysis.” Error ...
  • Richards, Jack C, and Theodore S Rodgers. Approaches and Methods ...
  • Runkati, K, and M Chatupote. Organizational Patterns and Common Mistakes ...
  • Soltani, Fatemeh, Azadeh Nemati and Mortaza Yamini. ”An Analysis of Translation ...
  • Whong, Melinda. Language Teaching: Linguistic Theory in Practice: Linguistic Theory ...
  • Widdowson, Henry G. “The Linguistic Perspective”. Handbook of Foreign Language ...
  • Yousofi, Nouroddin. “Describing the Errors in the Translations of Iranian ...
  • Yule, George. The Study of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, ...
  • Zafar, Ameena. “Error Analysis: A Tool to Improve English Skills ...
  • Zheng, Cui, and Tae-Ja Park. “An Analysis of Errors in ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع