Meaningfulness of Religious Language in the Light of Conceptual Metaphorical Use of Image Schema: A Cognitive Semantic Approach

Publish Year: 1392
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 88

This Paper With 11 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_RIURD-2-4_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 24 بهمن 1400

Abstract:

According to modern religious studies, religions are rooted in certain metaphorical representations, so they are metaphorical in nature. This article aims to show, first, how conceptual metaphors employ image schemas to make our language meaningful, and then to assert that image-schematic structure of religious expressions, by which religious metaphors conceptualize abstract meanings, is the basis of meaningfulness of religious language. Authors benefit from cognitive theories of some eminent semanticists, such as Mark Johnson, Jean Mandler, George Lakoff, et al., on metaphors. There are, as described by cognitive semantics, many preconceptual patterns that constitute a network of meaningful image-schemata upon which our primary knowledge is grounded. It is argued that image-schemata are inherently meaningful, and conceptual metaphors by using these image-schemata transmit the meaningfulness to the religious representations.

Keywords:

cognitive semantics , image schema , Conceptual Metaphor , meaningfulness of religious language

Authors

Javad Taheri

Iranian Association for Philosophy of Religion

Mahshid Alvandi

Iranian educational administration

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Abdulmoneim, Mohamed Shokr. ۲۰۰۶. “The Metaphorical Concept ‘Life is a ...
  • El-Sharif, Ahmad. ۲۰۱۱. “A Linguistic Study of Islamic Religious Discourse: ...
  • Erussard, Laurence. ۱۹۹۷. “From SALT to SALT: Cognitive Metaphor and ...
  • Evans, Vyvyan. ۲۰۰۷. A Glossary of Cognitive Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh ...
  • Evans, Vyvyan, and Melanie Green. ۲۰۰۶. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. ...
  • Evans, Vyvyan, Benjamin K. Bergen, and Jörg Zinken. ۲۰۰۷. “The ...
  • Fillmore, Charles. ۱۹۷۵. “An Alternative to Check List Theories of ...
  • Grady, Joseph, Todd Oakley, and Sean Coulson. ۱۹۹۹. “Blending and ...
  • Jäkel, Olaf. ۲۰۰۲. “Hypotheses Revisited: The Cognitive Theory of Metaphor ...
  • Johnson, Mark. ۱۹۸۷. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily ...
  • ———. ۱۹۸۹. “Image-Schematic Bases of Meaning.” RSSI (Recherches Semiotique/Semiotic Inquiry ...
  • Lakoff, George. ۱۹۸۷. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories ...
  • ———. ۱۹۹۰. “The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on ...
  • Lakoff, George, and Henry Thompson. ۱۹۷۵. “Introduction to Cognitive Grammar.” ...
  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. ۲۰۰۳. Metaphors We Live by. ...
  • ———. ۱۹۹۹. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and ...
  • Mandler, Jean. ۱۹۹۲. “How to Build a Baby II. Conceptual ...
  • ———. ۲۰۰۴. The Foundations of Mind: Origins of Conceptual Thought. ...
  • Rosch, Eleanor. ۱۹۷۵. “Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories.” Journal of ...
  • Tracy, David, ۱۹۷۸. “Metaphor and Religion: The Test Case of ...
  • Turner, Mark. ۱۹۹۶. The Literary Mind. New York: Oxford University ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع