The Effect of Functional-based Approach vs. Structural-based Approach on the Accuracy of Certain Grammatical Structures on Iranian EFL Learners

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 136

This Paper With 24 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_RELT-10-1_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 30 بهمن 1400

Abstract:

The present study aimed at examining the possible effects of the functional-based approach vs. structural-based approach on the accuracy of certain grammatical structures on Iranian EFL learners. In many textbooks taught in Iran, grammar is reflected as an important tool for the enhancement of language proficiency. Reading the table of contents of many textbooks, one can find out that functions have been written for each grammatical structure. Nevertheless, observing classes, one can see little to no emphasis on the functional use of the grammatical structure. To achieve the main goal of this study, ۴۱ male and female learners with the age range of ۱۵ to ۳۰ were selected from among ۶۰ learners as homogeneous lower-intermediate participants of the study by Oxford Placement Test (OPT). They received different interventions in the two experimental groups of functional (N = ۲۰) and structural (N = ۲۱) being divided non-randomly based on their OPT scores. The Functional group was taught grammar using the functional approach while the structural group experienced grammar instruction using the structural approach for four sessions. Analyzing the obtained data of role-play tests performed on both groups and at both pretest and posttest using paired samples t-test and ANCOVA uncovered that both structural and functional-based approaches can enhance the acquisition of grammatical accuracy,

Authors

Kazem Najmi

Department of English Language Teaching, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Masoumeh Salarpour

Alzahra University

Mohamad Ahmadi

Department of English Language Teaching, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmed, A. I. M. (۲۰۱۳). The functional approach to second ...
  • Beatty, K. (۲۰۱۳). Teaching & researching: Computer-assisted language learning: Routledge ...
  • Birch, D. (۱۹۸۲). The Birmingham school of discourse analysis and ...
  • Butler, C. S. (۲۰۰۸). Cognitive adequacy in structural-functional theories of ...
  • Canale, M., & Swain, M. (۱۹۸۰). Theoretical bases of communicative ...
  • Crystal, D. (۲۰۱۱). A dictionary of linguistics and phonetics (Vol. ...
  • Diane, L. (۲۰۱۹). Techniques and principles in language teaching. In: ...
  • Dittmar, N. (۱۹۸۱). On the verbal organization of L۲ tense ...
  • Ek, J. v., & Alexander, L. G. (۱۹۸۰). Threshold level ...
  • Elley, W. B. (۱۹۹۱). Acquiring literacy in a second language: ...
  • Givón, T. (۲۰۰۵). Context as other minds: The pragmatics of ...
  • Givón, T., & Malle, B. F. (۲۰۰۲). The evolution of ...
  • Hall, G. (۲۰۱۷). Exploring English language teaching: Language in action: ...
  • Hinkel, E. (۲۰۱۱). Handbook of research in second language teaching ...
  • Huebner, T. (۱۹۸۳). Linguistic systems and linguistic change in an ...
  • Keck, C., & Kim, Y. (۲۰۱۴). Pedagogical grammar: John Benjamins ...
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (۲۰۰۳). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring: Heinle ...
  • Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (۲۰۱۳). Techniques and principles in ...
  • Levin, B. (۲۰۱۵). Semantics and pragmatics of argument alternations ...
  • Liamkina, O., & Ryshina‐Pankova, M. (۲۰۱۲). Grammar dilemma: Teaching grammar ...
  • MacWhinney, B. (۱۹۸۸). Competition and teachability. Paper presented at the ...
  • McLaughlin, B. (۱۹۸۷). Theories of second-language learning. London, UK: Edward ...
  • Mitchell, R., & Myles, F. (۲۰۰۴). Second language learning theories ...
  • Moore, K. D., & Hansen, J. (۲۰۱۱). Effective strategies for ...
  • Nassaji, H., & Fotos, S. S. (۲۰۱۱). Teaching grammar in ...
  • Newmeyer, F. J. (۲۰۰۰). Deconstructing grammaticalization. Language Sciences, ۲۳(۲-۳), ۱۸۷-۲۲۹ ...
  • Ninio, A. (۲۰۰۱). Pragmatic keywords and the first combining verbs ...
  • Noormohamadi, R. A functional approach to SLA: Givon’s functional-typological syntactic ...
  • North, S. (۲۰۰۵). Disciplinary variation in the use of theme ...
  • Pfaff, C. W. (۱۹۹۲). The issue of grammaticalization in early ...
  • Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (۲۰۱۴). Approaches and ...
  • Robinson, P., & Ellis, N. C. (۲۰۰۸). Handbook of cognitive ...
  • Robinson, P. (۲۰۰۳). The cognitive hypothesis, task design, and adult ...
  • Sato, C. J. (۱۹۸۸). Origins of complex syntax in interlanguage ...
  • Sedova, K., Salamounova, Z., & Svaricek, R. (۲۰۱۴). Troubles with ...
  • Taka, V. P. (۲۰۰۸). Vocabulary learning strategies and foreign language ...
  • Verhoeven, L. T. (۱۹۹۴). Functional literacy: Theoretical issues and educational ...
  • Wang, P. (۲۰۱۱). Constructivism and learner autonomy in foreign language ...
  • Weaver, C. (۱۹۹۶). Teaching grammar in the context of writing. ...
  • Yalden, J. (۱۹۸۷). Principles of course design for language teaching. ...
  • Yang, L. R., & Givón, T. (۱۹۹۷). Benefits and drawbacks ...
  • Yule, G. (۲۰۱۰). The study of language: Cambridge University Press ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع