Correction the Bias of Odds Ratio resulting from the Misclassification of Exposures in the Study of Environmental Risk Factors of Lung Cancer using Bayesian Methods

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 150

This Paper With 13 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

این Paper در بخشهای موضوعی زیر دسته بندی شده است:

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JOBJ-3-1_007

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 17 اسفند 1400

Abstract:

Background & Objective: Inability to measure exact exposure in epidemiological studies is a common problem in many studies, especially cross-sectional studies. Depending on the extent of misclassification, results may be affected. Existing methods for solving this problem require a lot of time and money and it is not practical for some of the exposures. Recently, new methods have been proposed in ۱:۱ matched case–control studies that have solved these problems to some extent. In the present study we have aimed to extend the existing Bayesian method to adjust for misclassification in matched case–control Studies with ۱:۲ matching. Methods: Here, the standard Dirichlet prior distribution for a multinomial model was extended to allow the data of exposure–disease (OR) parameter to be imported into the model excluding other parameters. Information that exist in literature about association between exposure and disease were used as prior information about OR. In order to correct the misclassification Sensitivity Analysis was accomplished and the results were obtained under three Bayesian Methods. Results: The results of naïve Bayesian model were similar to the classic model. The second Bayesian model by employing prior information about the OR, was heavily affected by these information. The third proposed model provides maximum bias adjustment for the risk of heavy metals, smoking and drug abuse. This model showed that heavy metals are not an important risk factor although raw model (logistic regression Classic) detected this exposure as an influencing factor on the incidence of lung cancer. Sensitivity analysis showed that third model is robust regarding to different levels of Sensitivity and Specificity. Conclusion: The present study showed that although in most of exposures the results of the second and third model were similar but the proposed model would be able to correct the misclassification to some extent.

Authors

علیرضا ابدی

Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of medical sciences. Tehran, Iran.

باقر پهلوان زاده

Department of Biostatistics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

کرامت نوری جلیانی

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

سید مصطفی حسینی

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Reade-Christopher, S.J. and L.L. Kupper, Effects of exposure misclassification on ...
  • Teschke, K., et al., Occupational exposure assessment in case–control studies: ...
  • Prescott, G.J. and P.H. Garthwaite, Bayesian analysis of misclassified binary ...
  • Liu, J., et al., Bayesian analysis of a matched case–control ...
  • Clayton, D., M. Hills, and A. Pickles, Statistical models in ...
  • Gustafson, P., Measurement error and misclassification in statistics and epidemiology: ...
  • Müller, P. and K. Roeder, A Bayesian semiparametric model for ...
  • Gustafson, P., N.D. Le, and R. Saskin, Case–control analysis with ...
  • Gustafson, P., N.D. Le, and M. Vallée, A Bayesian approach ...
  • Rice, K., Full‐likelihood approaches to misclassification of a binary exposure ...
  • Rice, K., On Bayesian analysis of misclassified data from a ...
  • Rice, K.M., Equivalence between conditional and mixture approaches to the ...
  • Breslow, N.E. and N.E. Day, Statistical methods in cancer research. ...
  • Tse, L.A., et al., Occupational risks and lung cancer burden ...
  • Lenters, V., et al, Endotoxin exposure and lung cancer risk: ...
  • Vida, S., et al., Occupational Exposure to Silica and Lung ...
  • Gandini, S., et al, Tobacco smoking and cancer: a meta-analysis. ...
  • MR, M., et al., Opium could Be Considered an Independent ...
  • Martin, J.C., et al., Occupational Risk Factors for Lung cancer ...
  • Tse, L.A., et al., Occupational risks and lung cancer burden ...
  • Diamond, E.L. and A.M. Lilienfeld, Effects of errors in classification ...
  • Gustafson, P. and S. Greenland, Curious phenomena in Bayesian adjustment ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع