Solving a Facility Location Problem by Three Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods

Publish Year: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 162

This Paper With 16 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_RIEJ-3-4_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 15 فروردین 1401

Abstract:

Selecting the most appropriate and optimal facility location for a new organization or expansion of an existing location is an important strategic issue. The location, which results in higher economic benefits through increased productivity and good distribution network, is the best location. It is necessary to compare the performance characteristics in a decisive way when a choice is to be made from among several alternative facility locations. While the facility location selection problem includes multiple conflicting criteria and a finite set of potential candidate alternatives, different multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods can be effectively applied to solve such type of problem. In this paper, we apply three MCDM methods on a facility location selection problem and their relative ranking performances are compared. Because of disagreement in the ranks obtained by the three different MCDM methods, a final ranking method based on REGIME is also proposed to facilitate the decision making process. Then, the results of this study are compared by the results of the same study.

Authors

M. Niyazi

School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam

School of Industrial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Drira, A., Pierreval, H. and Hajri-Gabouj, S. (۲۰۰۷). Facility layout ...
  • Yang, T. and Kuo, C. (۲۰۰۳). A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology ...
  • Rao, R. V. and Singh, D. (۲۰۱۲). Weighted Euclidean distance ...
  • Lin, S. S., Lee, R. H., Perng, C., Chiou, W. ...
  • Enea, M., Galante, G. and Panascia, E. (۲۰۰۵). The facility ...
  • Ertay, T., Ruan, D. and Tuzkaya, U. R. (۲۰۰۶). Integrating ...
  • Kuo, Y., Yang, T. and Huang, G. W. (۲۰۰۸). The ...
  • Athawale, V. M. and Chakraborty, S. (۲۰۱۰). Facility layout selection ...
  • Chatterjee, P., Athawale, V.M. and Chakraborty, S. (۲۰۱۰). Selection of ...
  • Maniya, K.D. and Bhatt, M. G. (۲۰۱۱). An alternative multiple ...
  • Yang, L., Deuse, J. and Jiang, P. (۲۰۱۳). Multiple-attribute decision-making ...
  • Yang, L. and Deuse, J. (۲۰۱۲). Multiple-attribute decision making for ...
  • M. Niyazi and R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam /IJRIE ۳(۴) (۲۰۱۴) ۴۱-۵۶ ۵۶[۱۳] ...
  • Shahanaghi, K. and Yazdian, S. A. (۲۰۱۰). Facility location and ...
  • Turskis, Z. and Zavadskas, E. K. (۲۰۱۰). A new additive ...
  • Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A., Turskis, Z. and Tamošaitiene, J. ...
  • Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Raslanas, S., Ginevicius, R., Komka, A. ...
  • Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E. K., and Trinkunas, V. (۲۰۰۷). A ...
  • Chatterjee, P. and Chakraborty, S. (۲۰۱۰), Selection of Flexible Manufacturing ...
  • Hwang, C. L. and Yoon, K. (۱۹۸۱). Multiple Attribute Decision ...
  • Yoon, K. (۱۹۸۷). A reconciliation among discrete compromise situations.Journal of ...
  • Hwang, C. L., Lai, Y. J. and Liu, T. Y. ...
  • Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P. and Rietveld, P. (۱۹۸۳). Qualitative discrete ...
  • Hinloopen, E., Nijkamp, P. and Rietveld, P. (۱۹۸۳). The regime ...
  • Chakraborty, R., Ray, A. and Dan, P. (۲۰۱۳). Multi criteria ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع