Recent Trends in Archaeological Theory: Some Comments

Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 97

This Paper With 9 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IJASB-6-1_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 20 تیر 1401

Abstract:

This paper is a selective review of some recent themes in archaeological theory since c.۲۰۰۰. It deals first with a philosophical pragmatism and its application to archaeological thought and practice. The paper then examines a turn to materiality, sometimes glossed as an ‘ontological turn’, and its implications for different aspects of theory and practice. Thirdly, the paper discusses the understanding the past in the context of the present and the need for archaeology to maintain and extend its engagement with issues of diversity. The argument of the paper concludes with some reflective comments on the author’s Archaeological Theory:  An Introduction, first published in ۱۹۹۹, in advance of the third revised edition. Two key themes in this reflection are first, issues arising from a pluralism and democracy of interpretation, and second, the tension between a generalizing survey of ‘world archaeology’ and the need to acknowledge and develop perspectives situated within diverse local contexts.

Authors

Matthew Johnson

Dept of Anthropology Northwestern University

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Andrews, G.; J.C. Barrett & J.S,C. Lewis۲۰۰۰ Interpretation not record: ...
  • Atalay, S.۲۰۰۶ Indigenous archaeology as decolonizing prac-tice.American Indian Quarterly ۳۰, ...
  • ۲۰۰۵ Philosophy of the Social Sciences: Towards Pragmatism. Cambridge, Polity ...
  • Bruchac, M.۲۰۱۰ Lost and found: NAGPRA, scattered relics,and restorative methodologies. ...
  • Buchli, V. & G. Lucas (eds)۲۰۰۲ Archaeologies of the Contemporary ...
  • Chadwick, A.۲۰۰۳ Post-processualism, professionalisation and archaeological methodologies: towards reflex-ive and ...
  • Cobb, C.۲۰۱۴ The once and future archaeology. American Antiquity ۷۹:۴, ...
  • Conkey, M.W.۲۰۰۵ Dwelling at the margin, action at the intersecti-on? ...
  • ۲۰۰۷ Questioning theory: is there a gender of theory in ...
  • Cooper, C.۲۰۱۴ The exploration of lived experience in late me-dieval ...
  • Coudart, A.۱۹۹۹ Why is there no post-processual archaeology in France? ...
  • Matt Edgeworth.۲۰۱۱ Excavation as a ground of archaeological knowledge. Archaeological ...
  • Gell, A.۱۹۹۸ Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford, Clarendon. ...
  • ۱۹۸۹ Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. Se-cond edition. London, Academic Press ...
  • Harris, O.۲۰۱۶ Becoming post-human: identity and the ontological turn. In ...
  • Heywood, P. ۲۰۱۲ Anthropology and what there is: reflections on ...
  • Hodder, I. ۲۰۱۲ Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relations- hip ...
  • Holtorf, C. ۲۰۰۹ A European perspective on indigenous and immigrant ...
  • Ingold, T. ۲۰۰۷ Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues ۱۴:۱, ۱-۱۶ ...
  • ۲۰۱۰ Footprints through the weather-world: walki-ng, breathing, knowing. Journal of ...
  • Ingold, T. and Vergunst, J.L. (eds) ۲۰۱۶ Ways of Walking: ...
  • James, W. ۲۰۰۸ (first published ۱۹۰۷) Pragmatism: A New Name ...
  • ۲۰۰۷ Ideas of Landscape. Oxford, Blackwell ...
  • ۲۰۱۰ Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Se- cond edition. Oxford, Blackwell ...
  • ۲۰۱۱ On the nature of empiricism in archaeology. Journal of ...
  • Jones, A. & B. Alberti (eds) ۲۰۱۳ Archaeology After Interpretation. ...
  • Kintigh, Keith; Jeffrey. Altschul; Mary. Beaudry; Robert.Drennan; Ann. Kinzig; Timothy. ...
  • Lucas, G.۲۰۱۲ Understanding the Archaeological Record.Cambridge University Press ...
  • ۲۰۱۵ The mobility of theory. Swedish Archaeolog-ical Review ۲۳, ۱۳-۳۲ ...
  • Lutz, C.۱۹۹۵ The gender of theory. In Behar, R. and ...
  • Miller, D. (ed.)۲۰۰۵ Materiality. Durham, Duke University Press ...
  • Misak, Cheryl. (ed.)۲۰۰۷ The New Pragmatists. Oxford, Clarendon ...
  • Misak, C.۲۰۱۳ The American Pragmatists. Oxford, OxfordUniversity Press ...
  • Perry, S. & N. Beale۲۰۱۵ The social web and archaeology’s ...
  • Preucel, R. & S. Mrozowski (eds)۲۰۱۰ Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: ...
  • Rorty, R.۱۹۹۹ Philosophy and Social Hope. Harmondswo-rth, Penguin ...
  • Shanks, M. & R.H. Mcguire۱۹۹۶ The craft of archaeology. American ...
  • Shanks, M. & C. Tilley۱۹۸۷ Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory andPractice. Cambridge ...
  • Shaw, J.۲۰۰۰ Ayodhya’s sacred landscape: ritual memory,politics and archaeological ‘fact’. ...
  • Smith, A.T.۲۰۰۴ The end of the essential archaeological subje-ct. Archaeological ...
  • Sofaer, J.۲۰۰۶ The Body as Material Culture. Cambridge University Press ...
  • Sommer, U.۲۰۰۰ Theory and tradition in German archaeology.Archaeological Dialogues ۷, ...
  • Trigger, B.G.۲۰۰۶ A History of Archaeological Thought. Secondedition. Cambridge University ...
  • Weismantel, M.forthcoming. Cuni Raya Superhero: Ontologiesof Water on Peru’s North ...
  • West, C.۱۹۸۹ The American Evasion of Philosophy: AGenealogy of Pragmatism. ...
  • Wilcox, M.۲۰۱۰ NAGPRA and Indigenous Peoples: The Soc-ial Context, Controversies ...
  • Wylie, A.۲۰۰۰ Questions of evidence, legitimacy, and the(dis)unity of science, ...
  • ۲۰۰۳ Why standpoint matters. In Figueroa, R., Ha-rding, S. and ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع