A Critical Study of Muslim Theologians’ Justifications of Adam’s Sin

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 42

This Paper With 13 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JCIS-4-1_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 شهریور 1401

Abstract:

Most of the Islamic theologians, particularly Shiites, who believe in prophets’ infallibility assert that Adam’s act in eating the forbidden fruit was not a sin. They have provided some justifications for Adam’s act. The most significant justification is that God's prohibition of eating the fruit was not obligatory but advisory. In another justification, Muslim theologians attribute Adam's sin to his children and generation. Other justifications belong to those theologians who accept that Adam's act was a sin done in disobedience to God's necessary prohibition. They justify his act in these ways: ۱) Adam was misled by Satan's oath; ۲) He committed the sin out of oblivion or mistake; ۳) His sin took place in the heaven; ۴) That was a minor sin; and ۵) Adam was not a prophet when he committed the sin. The current study aimed at analyzing these justifications. In conclusion, according to some evidence, it seems that God's command to Adam was not advisory. Accordingly, Adam's sin was neither minor nor unintentional. The kind of command, advisory or necessary, or the place where sin was committed is not important. What matters is that Adam disobeyed Gods’ strict and direct command. Since a prophet should obey all God's commands, Adam’s act was a sin.

Authors

حسین اترک

Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities, University oF Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • The noble Qur’ān. Translated by M. A. S. Abdel Haleem, ...
  • The noble Qur’ān. Translated by Mohammad Habib Shakir ...
  • The Holy Bible, Translated From The Latin Vulgate, Diligently Compared ...
  • Abd-u Al-Jabbār. (۱۹۶۵), Al-Mughnī fī Abwāb-i al-Tuhīd wa Al-᾽Adl. Qāhirah, ...
  • Fāḍil, M. (۲۰۰۲), Al-Lawāmiʿ-u al-Ilāhīyya fi al-Mabāhith-i al-Kalāmīyya. Qom, Daftar ...
  • Fakhr Rāzī, M. (۲۰۰۰), Tafsīr-u Mafātīh-i al-Ghayb. Beirut, Dār Ihyāʼ ...
  • Hillī, A. (۱۹۸۴), Anwār-u al-Malakūt fī Sharh-i al-Yāqūt. Qom, Al-Sharīf ...
  • Ḥumṣī Rāzī, S. (۱۹۹۲), Al-Munqidh mina al-Taqlīd. Qum, Al-Nashr al-Islami ...
  • Ibn Abi al-Hadīd, ʿA. (۲۰۰۴), Sharh Nahjul Balāgha. Qom, Maktabt ...
  • Ibn Manẓūr, M. (۱۹۹۴), Lisān-u al-Arab. Beirut, Dār-u Şād, ...
  • Ījī, ʿA. & ͑A. Jurjānī, (۱۹۴۶), Sharh-u al-Mawāqif. Ed. B. ...
  • Makārim Shīrāzī, N. (۲۰۰۰), Al-Amthal fi Tafsīr-i Kītāb-i Al-Munzal. Qum, ...
  • Mufīd, M. (۱۹۹۳), Awāil-u al-Maqālāt fi al-Madhāhib wa al-Mukhtārāt. Qum, ...
  • Mūsawī, ʿA. (۲۰۰۶), Al-Iṣmat-u fi al-Nabuwwat wa al-Imamat. In: Fī ...
  • Muẓaffar, M. (۲۰۰۲), Dalāil-u al-Ṣidq. Qom, Āl-u al-Bayt Institute ...
  • Qāḍī ͑Ayyāḍ, A. (۱۹۸۳), Al-Shifā bi Ta͑rīf-i Huqūq-u al-Mustafā. ʿAmmān, ...
  • Sadūq, M. (۱۹۹۹), ‘Uyūn-i Akhbār-i al-Reżā. Tehran, Nashr-e Jahān ...
  • Sayyid Murtaḍā, (۱۹۹۱), Al-Dhakhīrah fī Ilm-i al-Kalām. Qom, Muʿassasat-u al-Nashr-u ...
  • Sayyid Murtaḍā, (۱۸۷۱), Tanzīh-u al-Anbīyā. Qom, al-Sharīf al- Rāzī ...
  • Subhānī, J. (n.d), Ismat-u al-Anbīyā. Qom, Imām Sādiq Institute ...
  • Taftāzānī, S. (۱۹۸۹), Sharh-u al-Maqāṣid. Qom, al-Sharīf al-Rāzī. Ṭurayḥī, F. (n.d), ...
  • Ṭūsī, M. (۲۰۰۳), Talkhīṣ al-Shāfī. Qom, Muhibbīn Press ...
  • Ṭūsī, N. (۱۹۸۵), Talkhīṣ al-Muhaṣṣal. Beirūt, Dār al-Aḍwā‘ ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع