McDonaldization in Iranian ELT Textbooks: Absence or Presence?

Publish Year: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 138

This Paper With 17 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ELT-6-14_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 دی 1401

Abstract:

The development of materials for language teaching has been retraced from different perspectives. For example, some have identified influences of a social view on designing course books and compiling materials for language classes. The purpose of this article is to focus on the specific case of ELT material, its design and priorities in the context of Iran. This article also offers a detailed analysis of the contemporary condition of Iranian context and the consequences of materials colonization in English language teaching courses.In addressing the question of “How McDonaldization is attributed to language teaching”, it is attempted to broaden the understanding of the condition of English teaching classrooms in different private language institutes and universities of Iran and show how the framework of standardization of materials is regarded as the main concern of the present educators of Iran’s context of English language teaching. Finally, the idea that uniformity of materials is an integral part of our classes is presented. Reviewing some scholars’ ideas about standardization of materials in our EFL context, the way teachers are pictured with their roles as experimenters rather than the mere designers of the detailed instructions is also highlighted. Meanwhile, increasing the amount and quality of teacher development programs and not disregarding the role of teachers would be practically useful recommendations for those involved in the process of EFL teaching in Iran.

Authors

رزانا شمس آبادی

Ph.D. Candidate, University of Isfahan (Corresponding author)

سعید کتابی

Associate Professor, University of Isfahan

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Breen, M. (۱۹۸۷). Learner contributions to task design. In C ...
  • Candlin, C. N. (۱۹۸۴). Syllabus design as a critical process, ...
  • Eslami-Rasekh, Z.,& Valizadeh, K. (۲۰۰۴). Classroom activities viewed from different ...
  • Haghighati, B .S., (۲۰۰۳).Investigating the Role of Methodology in Students` ...
  • Kırkgöz, Y. (۲۰۰۹). Globalization and English language policy in Turkey. ...
  • Lin, A.M.Y. (۱۹۹۹). Doing-English-Lessons in the Reproduction or Transformation of ...
  • Littlejohn, A. (۲۰۱۱). The Analysis of Language Teaching Materials: Inside ...
  • Littlejohn, A. (۲۰۱۲). Language Teaching Materials and the (Very) Big ...
  • Littlejohn, A. (۲۰۱۳). The Social Location of Language Teaching: From ...
  • InA. Ahmed, M. Hanzala, F. Saleem& G. Cane (Eds.), ELT ...
  • Masuhara, H., M.,Haan, Y. Yi.,&Tomlinson.B. (۲۰۰۸).Adult EFL courses.ELT Journal ۶۲(۳), ...
  • McDonough, J. & Shaw, C. (۱۹۹۳).Materials and Methods in ELT.Oxford: ...
  • Ritzer, G. (۱۹۹۳) The McDonaldization of society. Los Angeles: Sage ...
  • Richards, J.C. & Rodgers, T.S. (۲۰۰۱).Approaches and methods in language ...
  • Ritzer, G. (۲۰۰۴). The MacDonaldization of Society: an investigation into ...
  • Ritzer, G. (۲۰۱۲).The McDonaldization of society.۲۰th anniversary edition (۷th ed.) ...
  • Stern, H.H. (۱۹۸۴). Review and discussion. In C. J. Brumfit.(Ed.). ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع