Language Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in Different Types of Writing Paragraph: Do the Raters Notice Such Effect

Publish Year: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 109

This Paper With 24 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ELT-9-20_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 دی 1401

Abstract:

The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of two types of paragraph on EFL learners’ written production. It addressed the issue of how three aspects of language production (i.e. complexity, accuracy, and fluency) vary among two types of paragraphs (i.e. paragraphs of chronology and cause-effect) written by EFL learners. Thirty intermediate level learners of English participated in the study. Each learner wrote the two specified types of paragraphs in the final exam of their writing course. In the first phase of the study, separate paired t-tests were conducted on each dependent variable to see whether there were any statistically significant differences in measures of complexity, accuracy, and fluency across the paragraph types. In the second phase of the study, to investigate if the raters detect the inconsistencies in the complexity, accuracy, and fluency of paragraphs written by a learner, four raters were asked to rate ۱۲ paragraphs written by six learners whose paragraphs differed extremely in one of the three features. The findings revealed that EFL learners performed significantly better in paragraphs of chronology than the paragraphs of cause-effect in terms of fluency and accuracy. However, the analysis of complexity measures showed that there was no significant difference between the two types of paragraphs. In the qualitative analysis, it was found that raters did not consistently consider these three features in their examining the quality of the paragraphs. They paid attention to qualities such as coherence, cohesion and unity more consistently.

Authors

سحر علوی زاهد

PhD in ELT, Shiraz University

علیرضا احمدی

Associate professor, Shiraz University

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ary, D., Jocabs, L., C., & Sorensen, C., K. (۲۰۱۶). ...
  • Brumfit, C. J. (۱۹۸۴). Communicative methodology in language teaching. Cambridge: ...
  • Cohen, J.W. (۱۹۸۸). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences ...
  • Crookes, G. (۱۹۸۹). Planning and interlanguage variability. Studies in Second ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۳). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford ...
  • Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۸). The study of second language acquisition (۲nd ...
  • Ellis, R. and G. Barkhuizen. (۲۰۰۵). Analysing learner language. Oxford: ...
  • Favart, M., & Chanquoy, L. (۲۰۰۷). Cohesion devices as crucial ...
  • Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (۱۹۹۶). The influence of planning ...
  • Foster, P. & Tavakoli, P. (۲۰۰۹). Native speakers and task ...
  • Gan, Z. (۲۰۱۰). Interaction in group oral assessment: A case ...
  • Iwashita, N., Brown, A., Mcnamara, T.& O’hagan, S. (۲۰۰۸). Assessed ...
  • Ismail, L., Samad, A., Eng. W. & Noordin, N. (۲۰۱۲). ...
  • Ghapanchi, Z & Alavi Z. S. (۲۰۱۱). The relation between ...
  • Kormos, J., & Dénes, M. (۲۰۰۴). Exploring measures and perceptions ...
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (۲۰۰۶). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy ...
  • Larsen-Freeman, D. (۲۰۰۹). Adjusting Expectations: The study of complexity, accuracy, ...
  • Leaper, D. & Riazi, M. (۲۰۱۴).The influence of prompt on ...
  • Mehnert, U. (۱۹۹۸). The effects of different lengths of time ...
  • Rezazadeh, M., Tavakoli, M. & Eslami, A. (۲۰۱۱). The role ...
  • Robinson, P. (۲۰۰۵). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in ...
  • Seyyedi, K., Ismail, S., & Mohamed, A. (۲۰۱۴). The Effect ...
  • Schneider, M., and Connor, U. (۱۹۹۱). Analyzing topical structure in ...
  • Shiriyan, Z. & Nejadansari, D. (۲۰۱۴). The effect of literature-response ...
  • Skehan, P. (۱۹۸۹). Individual differences in second language learning. London: ...
  • Skehan, P. (۱۹۹۸). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford:Oxford ...
  • Skehan, P. (۲۰۰۹). Modeling second language performance: Integrating complexity, accuracy, ...
  • Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (۱۹۹۹). The influence of task ...
  • Taylor, L. & Wigglesworth, G. (۲۰۰۹). Are two heads better ...
  • Van Moere, A. (۲۰۱۲).A psycholinguistic approach to oral language assessment. ...
  • Wigglesworth, G. (۱۹۹۷). An investigation of planning time and proficiency ...
  • Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (۲۰۰۹). Pair versus individual writing: ...
  • Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. (۱۹۹۸). Second language ...
  • Yuan, F., & Ellis, R. (۲۰۰۳). The effects of pre‐task ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع