An Applied Linguistics Look at the Linguistic Comparison of Nominal Group Complexity between Two Samples of a Genre

Publish Year: 1397
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 114

This Paper With 12 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ELT-10-21_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 دی 1401

Abstract:

The roles and effects of changes in syntax on comprehension and processing effort, and the relationships between these two, comprise a large and separate field of inquiry, with the general belief now in place that such changes and variations bring about varied psycholinguistic and discursive implications for comprehension, manifesting themselves differently in different genres.The current study is a brief attempt at bringing out the differences in the complexity of the noun groups in two novels, one of which is a ۱۹th century novel, Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre, and the other is a ۲۱st century one, Stephanie Meyer’s Twilight. Each novel was analyzed for the ten longest nominal groups used in them, representative also of the complexity inherently evidenced by a long nominal group. It turned out that there is little difference between the size of noun groups in the two novels. Thus, the added complexity and challenge in processing and comprehending ۱۹th century prose fiction can be explained by the generic tendency in such genre towards the deployment of a higher rate of rank-shifted embedded structures in the noun groups and more varied qualifiers that employ more non-finite clauses as post-nominal qualification. There is need to look into processing difficulty and interpretation challenge posed by different literary genres for different groups of learners, because, in line with a now common SLA understanding, full and conscious comprehension, parsing and interpretation of syntactic components play a marked role in rich and native-like writing for learners.

Authors

یاسر حدیدی

Assistant Professor, University of Tabriz

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Afflerbach, P. & Byeong-Young C. (۲۰۰۹) Identifying and Describing Constructively ...
  • Blake, N. F. (۱۹۹۰). An introduction to the language of ...
  • Duchowski, Andrew T. (۲۰۰۷). Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice ...
  • Duchowski, Andrew T. (۲۰۰۳). Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. ...
  • Göpferich, S., Lykke J. A, and Mees, I. (۲۰۰۸). Looking ...
  • Hadidi, Y. & Ghankaran-Shotorban, S. (۲۰۱۵). Investigating Possible Evolutionary Reduction ...
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (۱۹۸۵). An introduction to functional grammar ...
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (۱۹۹۴). An introduction to functional grammar ...
  • Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. ...
  • Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. ...
  • Malchukov, A. L. (۲۰۰۴). Nominalization / verbalization: constraining a typology ...
  • Pastor, L.C. (۲۰۰۸). English Complex Noun Phrase Interpretation by Spanish ...
  • Rayner, K & Pollatsek, A. (۱۹۸۹). The Psychology of Reading. ...
  • Rayner, K & Sereno, S. C. (۱۹۹۴) Eye Movements in ...
  • Thibault, P. J. (۱۹۹۱). Grammar, Technocracy, and the Noun: Technocratic ...
  • Verdonk, P. (۲۰۰۲). Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press ...
  • Widdowson, H. G. (۱۹۷۵). Stylistics and the teaching of literature. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع