The political aspects of positivist ELT research articles

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 128

This Paper With 22 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ELT-11-24_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 10 دی 1401

Abstract:

Despite appealing notion of research based language teaching, we argue that scientific way of conducting research on English language teaching (ELT) is problematic since it ignores language learners’ subjectivity, instructors’ professionalism, practitioners’ culture and learning particularity. Positivists pedagogical arguments neglect the social nature of meaning making instructional practices and emphasize objectivity and measurability criteria which lead to instrumental rationality. A critical discourse analysis of practical arguments proposed in pedagogical implications section of empiricist research articles revealed that positivists assumptions manifest themselves as the rules and regulations of carrying out scientific research. These yardsticks give power to the neoliberal tendencies to present reasons as premises of arguments to restrict and control the agency of ELT teachers as well as to deprofessionalize them. Since there is a close affinity between this paradigm world views and neoliberal policies, positivists research articles lead to the domination of neoliberalism on TEFL discourse. This indicates the ideological function of the article genre and awareness of that is crucial for the sake of democratic and fair education.

Authors

رضا خانی

Assistant Professor, English department, Ilam university, Iran.

محمود سماعی

Associated Professor, English department, Ilam university, Iran.

علی خدیور

PhD student, English department, Ilam university, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Apple, M. W. (۲۰۰۴). Ideology and curriculum (۳rd edition). New ...
  • Fairclough, N. (۱۹۸۹) Language and Power London: LongmansFairclough, I. and ...
  • Fairclough, I. and N. Fairclough. ۲۰۱۱. Political discourse analysis: A ...
  • Fairclough, I., and Fairclough, N. (۲۰۱۳). Argument, Deliberation, Dialectic and ...
  • Fairclough, N. and I. Fairclough .۲۰۱۸. ‘A procedural approach to ...
  • Gorur, R., Hamilton, M., Lundahl, C. and Sjödin, E.S., ۲۰۱۹. ...
  • KhosraviNik, Majid (۲۰۱۰) 'Actor descriptions, action attributions, and argumentation: towards ...
  • Lightbown, P.M. and N. Spada,.۱۹۹۹. How Languages Are Learnt (Second ...
  • Meyer, C. (۲۰۰۱). Between Theory, Method, and Politics: Positioning of ...
  • Sato, M. and Loewen, S. ۲۰۱۹. ‘Do teachers care about ...
  • Searle, J. ۲۰۱۰. Making the Social World. The Structure of ...
  • Trahey, M. and L. White. ۱۹۹۳. ‘Positive evidence and preemption ...
  • Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R. and Vetter, E. (۲۰۰۰) ...
  • Van Dijk, T. A. (۱۹۹۳). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse ...
  • van Eemeren, F. H., B.J. Garssen & B. Meuffels. ۲۰۱۵. ...
  • Walton, D. ۲۰۱۳. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Mahwah: Lawrence ...
  • Willis. J. W. ۲۰۰۷. Foundation of the Qualitative Research. Sage ...
  • Whitson, J. A. & W.B. Stanley .۱۹۹۰. ‘Developing practical competence ...
  • Wodak, R. (۲۰۰۱). What CDA is About: A Summary of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع