سیویلیکا را در شبکه های اجتماعی دنبال نمایید.

Effect of Tumor-Pixel Positioning on the Variability of SUV Measurements in PET Images

Publish Year: 1402
Type: Journal paper
Language: English
View: 193

This Paper With 11 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

Export:

Link to this Paper:

Document National Code:

JR_JNMB-11-1_009

Index date: 14 January 2023

Effect of Tumor-Pixel Positioning on the Variability of SUV Measurements in PET Images abstract

Objective(s): The aim of this study was to investigate the effect on standardized uptake value (SUV) measurement variability of the positional relationship between objects of different sizes and the pixel of a positron emission tomography (PET) image. Methods: We used a NEMA IEC body phantom comprising six spheres with diameters of 10, 13, 17, 22, 28, and 37 mm. The phantom was filled with 18F solution and contained target-to-background ratios (TBRs) of 2, 4, and 8. The PET data were acquired for 30 min using a SIGNA PET/MR scanner. The PET images were reconstructed with the ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm with and without point-spread function (PSF) correction (OSEM + PSF + Filter and OSEM + Filter, respectively). A Gaussian filter of 4 mm full width at half maximum was applied in all reconstructions, except for one model (OSEM + PSF + no Filter). The matrix sizes were 128×128, 192×192, 256×256 and 384×384. Reconstruction was performed by shifting the reconstruction center position by 1 mm in the range 0 to 3 mm in the upward or rightward direction for each parameter. For all reconstructed images, the SUVmax of each hot sphere was measured. To investigate the resulting variation in the SUVmax, the coefficient of variation (CV) of each SUVmax was calculated. Results: The CV of the SUVmax increased as the matrix size and the diameter of the hot sphere decreased in all reconstruction settings. With PSF correction, the CV of SUVmax increased as the TBR increased except when the TBR was 2. The CV of the SUVmax measured in the OSEM + PSF + no Filter images were larger than those measured in the OSEM + PSF + Filter images. The amount of this increase was higher for smaller spheres and larger matrix sizes and was independent of TBR. Conclusions: Shifting the reconstruction center position of the PET image causes variability in SUVmax measurements. To reduce the variability of SUV measurements, it is necessary to use sufficient matrix sizes to satisfy sampling criterion and appropriate filters.

Effect of Tumor-Pixel Positioning on the Variability of SUV Measurements in PET Images Keywords:

Effect of Tumor-Pixel Positioning on the Variability of SUV Measurements in PET Images authors

Koji Itagaki

Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan

Katsuhiko Mitsumoto

Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan

Masaaki Kajisako

Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan

Maki Shioji

Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan

Shigeto Kawase

Division of Clinical Radiology Service, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe VJ, ...
Johnson SA, Kumar A, Matasar MJ, Schöder H, Rademaker J. ...
Lin C, Itti E, Haioun C, Petegnief Y, Luciani A, ...
Weber BWA, Petersen V, Schmidt B, Tyndale-hines L, Link T, ...
Adams MC, Turkington TG, Wilson JM, Wong TZ. A systematic ...
Benz MR, Evilevitch V, Allen-auerbach MS, Eilber FC, Phelps ME, ...
Lodge MA, Chaudhry MA, Wahl RL. Noise considerations for PET ...
Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET ...
Nahmias C, Wahl LM. Reproducibility of standardized uptake value measurements ...
Krak NC, Boellaard R, Hoekstra OS, Twisk JWR, Hoekstra CJ, ...
Beyer T, Czernin J, Freudenberg LS. Variations in clinical PET/CT ...
Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, ...
Nakamoto Y, Zasadny KR, Minn H, Wahl RL. Reproducibility of ...
Velasquez LM, Boellaard R, Kollia G, Hayes W, Hoekstra OS, ...
Hashimoto N, Morita K, Tsutsui Y, Himuro K, Baba S, ...
Rahmim A, Qi J, Sossi V. Resolution modeling in PET ...
Kidera D, Kihara K, Akamatsu G, Mikasa S, Taniguchi T, ...
Jaskowiak CJ, Bianco JA, Perlman SB, Fine JP. Influence of ...
Maebatake A, Morita K, Akamatsu G, Tsutsui Y, Himuro K, ...
Fukukita H, Suzuki K, Matsumoto K, Terauchi T, Daisaki H, ...
Munk OL, Tolbod LP, Hansen SB, Bogsrud T V. Point-spread ...
Rogasch JMM, Hofheinz F, Lougovski A, Furth C, Ruf J, ...
Thielemans K, Asma E, Ahn S, Manjeshwar RM, Deller T, ...
Tong S, Alessio AM, Kinahan PE. Noise and signal properties ...
Morey AM, Noo F, Kadrmas DJ. Effect of using ۲mm ...
Akamatsu G, Mitsumoto K, Taniguchi T, Tsutsui Y, Baba S, ...
Adler S, Seidel J, Choyke P, Knopp M V, Binzel ...
Boellaard R, Krak NC, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA. Effects of ...
Koopman D, van Dalen JA, Lagerweij MCM, Arkies H, de ...
Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST ...
Kinahan PE, Perlman ES, Sunderland JJ, Subramaniam R, Wollenweber SD, ...
نمایش کامل مراجع