Comparison of the Success Rate of Treatment with Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention PCI versus Thrombolytic Treatment in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Local Hospitals in Iran

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 211

This Paper With 8 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_ZUMS-31-144_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 26 دی 1401

Abstract:

Background and Objective: Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is caused due to coronary artery occlusion and divided into two forms of ST-elevation (STEMI) and non-ST-elevation (NSTEMI) myocardial infarction. This study aimed to determine the success rate of treatment with primary PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention) versus thrombolysis in the establishment of perfusion and to evaluate the short-term complications caused by each method. Materials and Methods: In this prospective cohort study, ۹۰ patients were selected for primary PCI treatment and ۹۰ patients for thrombolytic treatment. Clinical data and basic demographic characteristics of the patients and cardiovascular risk factors were recorded. The success rate of coronary reperfusion by primary PCI and thrombolytic therapy was then determined by angiography and ۹۰-minute ECG with resolution or improvement of chest pain. All patients were examined for any serious complications such as cerebrovascular accidents, shock, and heart failure for ۳۰ days after treatment. Data were analyzed using SPSS ver. ۲۰. Results: In the primary PCI group, ۷۵.۶% of the patients were males, and ۲۴.۴% were females, but in the thrombolytic group, ۷۶.۶% and ۲۳.۳% of the cases were males and females, respectively. The mean door-to-balloon time for PCI was ۶۳.۶۰ ± ۲۳.۹۲ and was ۵۳.۷۰ ±۲۱.۵۲ min in the thrombolytic group. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade III and TIMI-II were the most frequent in primary PCI and thrombolytic groups, respectively. The odds ratio (OD) of mechanical MI and major arrhythmia in patients received the primary PCI compared to those received thrombolytic therapy was ۰.۲۴ and ۰.۶۶, respectively. Also, the OD of mortality in the primary PCI group was ۲.۱۲. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that in STEMI patients, the chances of short-term complications such as post-MI mechanical complications, major arrhythmia, and bleeding requiring blood transfusion were lower in patients who were treated with primary PCI than those who received thrombolytic treatment. Also, the average hospitalization in CCU and hospital in the primary PCI group was lower than the thrombolytic group.

Keywords:

Primary PCI , Thrombolytic , Fibrinolysis , ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI)

Authors

Soleiman Gharanjik

Dept. of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

Morteza Motedayen

Dept.of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

Reza Hasanzadeh Makoui

Dept. of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

Nima Motamed

School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

Minoo Emami

School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

Armin Bordbar

Dept. of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

Mohammad Reza Jamshidi

Dept. of Cardiac Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

Reza Madadi

Dept. of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Shah RU, Rutten-Ramos S, Garberich R, Tighiouart M, Henry TD, ...
  • Wojakowski W, Tendera M, Tubaro M, et al. Are elderly ...
  • Kornowski R, Vaknin-Assa H, Dvir D, et al. The impact ...
  • Kasprzak J, Kolodziej K, Peruga J,et al. Inflammation/LIPID score may ...
  • Savonitto S, Armstrong P, Lincoff A, et al. Risk of ...
  • Larson DM, Duval S, Sharkey SW, et al. Safety and ...
  • Halvorsen S, Huber K. The role of fibrinolysis in the ...
  • Kazemi T, Sharifzadeh G, Zarban A, Fesharakinia A. Comparison of ...
  • Kouhestani HR, Baghcheghi N, ZAND S. Impact of teaching cardiac ...
  • Taherian A, Mohammadi F, Hosseini MA, Rahgoaar M, Falahi KM. ...
  • Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, et al. ESC Guidelines ...
  • Bonow RO, Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P. Braunwald's Heart ...
  • Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, et al. ۲۰۱۴ ESC/EACTS ...
  • Ge H, Pu J, Li Z, et al. Comparison of ...
  • Armstrong PW, Gershlick AH, Goldstein P, et al. Fibrinolysis or ...
  • Widimský P, Budešínský T, Voráč D, et al. Long distance ...
  • Henriques JP, Zijlstra F, van't Hof AW, et al. Primary ...
  • Claeys MJ, de Meester A, Convens C, et al. Contemporary ...
  • Busk M, Maeng M, Rasmussen K, et al. The Danish ...
  • Dieker H, Brouwer M, van Horssen E, et al. Fibrinolysis ...
  • Steg PG, Bonnefoy E, Chabaud S, et al. Impact of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع