COMPARISON BETWEEN UNCERTAINTY MEARURES IN PROBABILISTIC ANALYSIS

Publish Year: 1386
نوع سند: مقاله کنفرانسی
زبان: English
View: 1,605

This Paper With 6 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

SEE05_409

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 شهریور 1385

Abstract:

One of the most important current purposes of earthquake engineers is precisely predicting the behavior of the structures during future earthquakes. The limitation of our information about seismic parameters such as distance from the epicenter, frequency content and peak ground acceleration and also the uncertainty of the applied analytical methods caused the probability theory into the earthquake engineering. In this paper, the measure of seismic demand and capacity has been obtained, using a method based on an incremental non-linear dynamic analysis and statistical process of the results. The maximum inter story drift ratio has been used as the damage measure (DM) and spectral acceleration corresponding to the fundamental period of the structure defined as the intensity measure (IM).Because of uncertainty in calculating seismic demand and capacity, there would be some uncertainties in the results. This uncertainties can be measured by two uncertainty measures, uncertainty index and total uncertainty. In this research, four steel frames with 4, 8, 12 and 16 stories that are representative of structures with low to medium periods have been studied and the uncertainty index and total uncertainty have been calculated for each of them, using a number of records which were scaled in different levels of earthquake intensity. According to the obtained results, the uncertainty measures compared to each other.

Authors

M.SAYYAR

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology

ZARFAM

Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology

MOFID

Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Cornell, C. Allin, Jalayer, Fatemeh., Hamburger, Ronald O., and Foutch, ...
  • FEMA (1997), NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of building, ...
  • FEMA (2000), NEHRP _، Rec ommended seismic design criteria for ...
  • Hamburger, R. O., Foutch, D. A. and Cornell, C. A. ...
  • Jalayer, F. and Cornell, A. (2000). "A Technical Framework for ...
  • Luco, N., and Cornell, C. A. (2000).، Effect of connection ...
  • Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA.، Incremental dynamic analysis." Earthquake Engineering and ...
  • Wen, Y. K. and Foutch, D. A. (1997), ;Proposed Statistical ...
  • Yan, S.Y. and Fautch, D.A. (2000), "Reliability and Performance Based ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع