Is Masquelet Technique A Successful Viable Treatment In Reconstructing Large Tumor Bone Gaps in Adolescent and Adult?

Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 108

This Paper With 8 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_TABO-11-5_008

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 27 خرداد 1402

Abstract:

Objectives: The reconstruction of large bony defect caused by tumor resection can be managed by different technique like bone graft, Masquelet technique, mega-prosthesis etc. Literature lacks studies discussing Masquelet technique in tumor cases especially pertaining to infected tumor in adults. We aimed to determine ۱) How often and how fast is the bone healing achieved after resection greater than ۱۰ cm bone in tumour patient’s using Masquelet technique?, ۲) Whether Masquelet technique can achieve optimum outcomes in adult infected cases too?Methods: We reviewed ۱۵۴ patients of benign & malignant tumour managed by us between ۲۰۱۳ and ۲۰۱۹. Patients belonging to all the age group with infected tumor/diaphysial tumor/periarticular tumor, where single stage surgery or mega-prosthesis is not a viable option and were treated with Masquelet technique for reconstructing a bone defect of at least ۱۰ cm were included in our study. We evaluated outcomes of eight patients for four parameters i.e. bony union, healing index, number of re-do surgeries required and limb length discrepancy.Results: Mean age of our study group was ۲۰.۲۵ years and patients followed for mean duration of ۳.۳۶ years. Mean bone loss after tumor resection was ۱۳.۱ cm (range = ۱۱.۵ cm to ۱۵ cm). There was no sign of recurrence of tumor in any patient at the time of last follow up. Average time required to achieve bony union was ۲۳.۲۵ months (mean healing index of ۱.۶۷ months/cm). All but one patient achieved bony union. Mean limb length discrepancy seen was ۱.۴۴cm. Infected cases showed low healing index with higher percentage of re-do surgeries.Conclusion: Induced membrane technique is quick, safe and reliable alternative method of reconstruction to megaprosthesis in cases with all age group where risk of failure of mega-prosthesis is high, either due to infection or shorter expected lifespan of prosthesis. However, obtaining union can be a difficult preposition in infected tumor cases and multiple surgeries may be required to get the desired result even after two stages. However, a comparative study with large sample size is required to further validate our results. Level of evidence: IV

Authors

Amit Sharma

Lady Hardinge Medical College, Delhi, India

Ankur Sharma

Lady Hardinge Medical College, Delhi, India

Shekhar Tomar

Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India

Abhishek Mishra

Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India

Abhishek Kashyap

Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India

Lalit Maini

Maulana Azad Medical College, Delhi, India

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Grimer RJ. Surgical options for children with osteosarcoma. Lancet Oncol. ۲۰۰۵; ...
  • Aldlyami E, Abudu A, Grimer RJ, Carter SR, Tillman RM. Endoprosthetic ...
  • Alman BA, De Bari A, Krajbich JI. Massive allografts in ...
  • Hattori H, Mibe J, Yamamoto K. Modular megaprosthesis in metastatic bone ...
  • Choong PF, Sim FH, Pritchard DJ, Rock MG, Chao EY. Megaprostheses ...
  • Jawad MU, Brien EW. Proximal femoral reconstruction with a constrained acetabulum ...
  • Biau DJ, Pannier S, Masquelet AC, Glorion C. Case report: reconstruction ...
  • Karger C, Kishi T, Schneider L, Fitoussi F, Masquelet AC. Treatment ...
  • Masquelet AC, Begue T. The concept of induced membrane for reconstruction ...
  • Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical ...
  • Whelan DB, Bhandari M, McKee MD, et al. Interobserver and intraobserver ...
  • Fitoussi F, Ilharreborde B. Is the induced-membrane technique successful for limb ...
  • Masquelet AC, Fitoussi F, Begue T, Muller GP. [Reconstruction of the ...
  • Hornicek FJ, Gebhardt MC, Tomford WW, et al. Factors affecting nonunion ...
  • Villemagne T, Bonnard C, Accadbled F, L'Kaissi M, de Billy ...
  • Chotel F, Nguiabanda L, Braillon P, Kohler R, Bérard J, ...
  • Auregan JC, Begue T, Rigoulot G, Glorion C, Pannier S. ...
  • Gouron R, Deroussen F, Plancq MC, Collet LM. Bone defect reconstruction ...
  • Gouron R. Surgical technique and indications of the induced membrane procedure ...
  • Dick HM, Strauch RJ. Infection of massive bone allografts. Clin Orthop ...
  • Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Jennings LC, Springfield DS, Tomford WW. Long-term ...
  • Donati D, Di Liddo M, Zavatta M, et al. Massive ...
  • Minami A, Kasashima T, Iwasaki N, Kato H, Kaneda K. Vascularised ...
  • Careri S, Vitiello R, Oliva MS, Ziranu A, Maccauro G, ...
  • Accadbled F, Mazeau P, Chotel F, Cottalorda J, de Gauzy ...
  • Mansour TM, Ghanem IB. Preliminary results of the induced membrane technique ...
  • Schöttle PB, Werner CM, Dumont CE. Two-stage reconstruction with free vascularized ...
  • Apard T, Bigorre N, Cronier P, Duteille F, Bizot P, ...
  • El-Alfy BS, Ali AM. Management of segmental skeletal defects by the ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع