The utilization of MARCOS method for different engineering applications: a comparative study

Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 79

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_RIEJ-12-2_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 24 مهر 1402

Abstract:

Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods are used widely by researchers to make decisions in the presence of numerous criteria. It is essential to make the right decision for the most of engineering applications which makes the decision-making process more complex and requires further analysis. A major issue of MCDM methods that they suffer from the Rank Reversal Phenomenon (RRP). Another drawback to MCDM methods that they produce different ranking when evaluating the same problem. Thus, researcher tend to develop new methods to overcome these problems. This paper explores the applicability of a new MCDM approach namely Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) by solving four different engineering problems. The results of MARCOS method are analyzed throughout a comparison with the results of other MCDM methods. The rank reversal test is explored for each problem to check the robustness of the method. The two phases of analysis indicate that the method is robust and applicable for different types of engineering applications.

Keywords:

Multiple Criteria Decision Making , Rank reversal phenomenon , Measurement alternatives and ranking according to compromise solution method , comparative study

Authors

Ahmed El-Araby

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Benham University, Benha, Egypt.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Triantaphyllou, E., Shu, B., Sanchez, S. N., & Ray, T. ...
  • Lootsma, F. A. (۱۹۹۰). The French and the American school ...
  • Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. (۲۰۱۱). Multiple criteria decision ...
  • Voogd, H. (۱۹۸۲). Multicriteria evaluation with mixed qualitative and quantitative ...
  • Aires, R. F. D. F., & Ferreira, L. (۲۰۱۸). The ...
  • Saaty, T. L. (۱۹۸۸). What is the analytic hierarchy process? ...
  • Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (۱۹۸۱). Methods for multiple ...
  • Kuo, Y., Yang, T., & Huang, G. W. (۲۰۰۸). The ...
  • Brans, J. P., & De Smet, Y. (۲۰۱۶). PROMETHEE methods. ...
  • Tzeng, G. H., & Huang, J. J. (۲۰۱۱). Multiple attribute ...
  • Fishburn, P. C. (۱۹۶۷). Additive utilities with incomplete product sets: ...
  • Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Zavadskas, E. K., & Turskis, Z. ...
  • Žižović, M., Pamučar, D., Albijanić, M., Chatterjee, P., & Pribićević, ...
  • Chakraborty, S. (۲۰۱۱). Applications of the MOORA method for decision ...
  • El-Araby, A., Sabry, I., & El-Assal, A. (۲۰۲۲). A comparative ...
  • Chakraborty, S., Chattopadhyay, R., & Chakraborty, S. (۲۰۲۰). An integrated ...
  • Badi, I., & Pamucar, D. (۲۰۲۰). Supplier selection for steelmaking ...
  • Stević, Ž., & Brković, N. (۲۰۲۰). A novel integrated FUCOM-MARCOS ...
  • Karaaslan, A., Adar, T., & Delice, E. K. (۲۰۲۲). Regional ...
  • Bhangale, P. P., Agrawal, V. P., & Saha, S. K. ...
  • Rao, R. V. (۲۰۰۷). Decision making in the manufacturing environment: ...
  • Milani, A. S., Shanian, A., Madoliat, R., & Nemes, J. ...
  • Chatterjee, P., & Chakraborty, S. (۲۰۱۲). Material selection using preferential ...
  • Yang, L., Deuse, J., & Jiang, P. (۲۰۱۳). Multiple-attribute decision-making ...
  • Fazlollahtabar, H., Smailbašić, A., & Stević, Ž. (۲۰۱۹). FUCOM method ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع