Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Pulmonary and Extrapulmonary Samples Using Different Methods: Experience of a Tertiary Care Center in North India

Backgrounds: Delay in the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) leads to poor response to treatment and the disease transmission to susceptible individuals. The Xpert MTB/RIF assay efficiently detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). The present study aimed to compare acid-fast bacilli (AFB) microscopy, culture, and Xpert MTB/RIF assay in the diagnosis of pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis cases. Materials & Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Microbiology, Government Medical College, Srinagar, India over ۱۸ months from February ۲۰۱۹ to July ۲۰۲۰. Samples were processed and evaluated using AFB microscopy, culture, and Xpert MTB/RIF assay. Findings: Among the ۱۸۶۲ samples evaluated, ۲۲۴ samples were found to be positive using AFB microscopy, culture, and Xpert MTB/RIF assay. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in diagnosing pulmonary TB cases was ۹۸.۲۳ and ۹۷.۶۹%, respectively. Among the smear-negative extrapulmonary samples, ۵۲ (۵.۷۵%) and ۸۶ (۹.۶%) samples were positive in culture and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay, respectively. The maximum recovery of MTB by Xpert MTB/RIF assay was from tissue biopsy specimens. Rifampicin resistance was observed in six samples. Conclusion: Both culture and Xpert MTB/RIF methods were sensitive in detecting smear-positive samples. Although both techniques missed some smear-negative pulmonary and extrapulmonary TB cases, the Xpert MTB/RIF assay enhanced the detection rate of MTB compared to culture. The Xpert MTB/RIF assay enabled the accurate diagnosis of tuberculosis cases with a rapid turnaround time; therefore, it could assist clinicians to start timely therapeutic interventions for these patients.

Keywords:

Pulmonary tuberculosis , Extrapulmonary tuberculosis , Diagnosis , Sensitivity and specificity