Reproductive performance and growth indices of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on various host plants
Publish place: Journal of Crop Protection، Vol: 2، Issue: 2
Publish Year: 1392
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 70
This Paper With 16 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_JCP-2-2_009
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 13 آبان 1402
Abstract:
The effect of various host plants including chickpea (varieties Arman, Hashem, Azad and Binivich), common bean (variety Khomein), white kidney bean (variety Dehghan), red kidney bean (variety Goli), cowpea (variety Mashhad), and tomato (variety Meshkin) on the reproductive performance and growth indices of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) was determined under laboratory conditions (۲۵ ± ۱°C, ۶۵ ± ۵% RH and a ۱۶:۸ h light:dark photoperiod). The highest rate of gross fecundity, gross fertility, net fecundity, net fertility, mean daily eggs and mean daily fertile eggs were observed on chickpea Arman (۲۹۴۷.۸ ± ۷.۸, ۲۹۳۳.۰ ± ۷.۸, ۲۴۰۴.۲ ± ۷.۱, ۲۳۹۲.۲ ± ۷.۱, ۱۷۰.۹ ± ۰.۴, and ۱۷۰.۱ ± ۰.۴ eggs female-۱, respectively), whereas the lowest values of these parameters were on tomato Meshkin (۸۴۷.۵ ± ۹.۲, ۶۷۳.۸ ± ۷.۳, ۲۲۵.۵ ± ۲.۶, ۱۷۹.۳ ± ۲.۱, ۶۷.۹ ± ۰.۷ and ۵۴.۳ ± ۰.۵ eggs female-۱, respectively). The development index of overall immature stages varied from ۱.۱۰ to ۱.۵۷, with the minimum on tomato Meshkin and the maximum on chickpea Arman. Also, the fitness and standardized insect-growth indices were highest (۰.۳۴۹ ± ۰.۰۰۹ and ۰.۰۵۸ ± ۰.۰۰۱ gr day-۱) and lowest (۰.۰۵۲ ± ۰.۰۰۱ and ۰.۰۱۳ ± ۰.۰۰۰ gr day-۱) on chickpea Arman and tomato Meshkin, respectively. The Weibull model sufficiently described the shape of the survivorship curve of adult H. armigera from life-table data. A significant fit was obtained with the Weibull model for H. armigera in all experimental host plants. The results of reproductive performance, growth indices and the cluster analysis showed that tomato Meshkin was partially resistant to H. armigera.
Keywords:
Authors
Seyed Ali Hemati
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, P. O. Box: ۵۶۱۹۹-۱۱۳۶۷, Ardabil, Iran.
Bahram Naseri
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, P. O. Box: ۵۶۱۹۹-۱۱۳۶۷, Ardabil, Iran.
Jabraeil Razmjou
Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, P. O. Box: ۵۶۱۹۹-۱۱۳۶۷, Ardabil, Iran.