Efficacy and Safety of the Irinotecan, Capecitabine, and Oxaliplatin (IOX) Regimen in Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Single Arm Phase II Trial

Publish Year: 1398
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 33

This Paper With 8 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_MISJ-10-1_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 25 آبان 1402

Abstract:

Background: Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancies worldwide with a high case mortality rate. In metastatic gastric cancer, a proper combination of chemotherapy could increase the survival rate. The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination regimen of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and Xeloda in metastatic gastric cancer.Methods: A total of ۴۵ patients with metastatic gastric cancer and good performance status according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (score: ۰-۱) received the irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and Xeloda chemotherapy regimen. Demographic data, responses to treatment, and adverse effects were gathered for all cases. Overall survival and progression-free survival rates for patients were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate. Results: Patients’ mean age was ۵۸.۳ ± ۱۱.۳ years (range: ۲۴-۸۱). There were ۷۳.۴% male patients and ۲۶.۶% female patients. Anorexia and weight loss were the most common symptoms. Overall response rate was ۵۰%. The majority of toxicities were anemia, nausea and vomiting (grades ۱ and ۲), diarrhea (grades ۱ and ۲), neutropenia, alopecia, and hand and foot syndrome. The one-year progression-free survival rate was ۳۱.۵ ± ۷.۵%, whereas the twoyear progression-free survival rate was zero. The one-year overall survival rate was ۳۴.۹۱ ± ۸.۵%. Patients had a two-year overall survival rate of ۷.۷ ± ۶.۶%. Diffuse type cancer was linked to an inferior outcome.Conclusion: Regardless of our limited number of patients, this combination could be a suitable regimen for metastatic gastric cancer in terms of low toxicity, acceptable response rate, and survival results.

Authors

Saeid Anvari

Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Kamran Alimoghaddam

Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Amir Kasaeian

Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Mohammad Vaezi

Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Mohsen Rajaeinejad

AJA Cancer Epidemiology Research and Treatment Center (AJA- CERTC), AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Mohammad Zokaasadi

Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Hosein Kamranzadeh

Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Ardeshir Ghavamzadeh

Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation Research Center, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran