The Views of Faculty Members and Basic Sciences Medical Students on the Students’ Teacher Evaluations in Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Iran

Publish Year: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 46

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SDME-14-2_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 21 آذر 1402

Abstract:

Background and Objectives Teacher evaluation is among the most influential methods of quality assurance and is essential to continuous quality improvement in education systems. The current study aims to evaluate the views of faculty members and basic sciences medical students on the evaluation of teachers by students in the Islamic Azad University, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Tehran, Iran. Methods The current descriptive analytical study was conducted in the faculty of medical sciences during the winter of ۲۰۱۵. The census sampling method was used to select the participants and ۳۳۵ students and ۳۵ faculty members were enrolled accordingly, of which ۳۰۰ students (۸۹.۵%) and ۳۳ faculty members (۹۴.۲%) completed the study. The data collection instrument used was a ۲۰-item questionnaire (created by the researcher) scored on a ۵-option Likert scale. The formal validity, content validity, content validity ratio (CVR), content validity index (CVI), and the structural validity of the questionnaire were confirmed using exploratory factor analysis. Its validity was measured by the Cronbach’s alpha. Data were analyzed with SPSS using t test. Results It was found that the lecturer’s popularity, students’ grades, and the research evidence provided by the lecturer in the classroom were the most important factors, while gender and course type were the least important factors influencing students’ evaluation of lecturers in the current study. The mean scores of students and lecturers regarding their views on the teacher evaluation system were ۷۹.۱۴ ± ۱۱.۸۹ and ۷۸.۰۰ ± ۸.۱۵ respectively. According to the results of an independent t test, no significant difference was observed between the scores of lecturers and students regarding their views on the teacher evaluation system (P > ۰.۰۱). Conclusions The questionnaire created by the researcher showed good validity and reliability to evaluate the views of faculty members and students on the teacher evaluation system. The lecturer’s popularity, students’ grades, and the research evidence provided by the lecturer were considered as the most important factors, while gender and course type were the least important factors influencing the teachers’ evaluation, based on the comments of the faculty members and students.

Authors

Soleiman Ahmady

PhD Medical Education, Associate Professor, Medical Education Group, Medical Education Faculty, Shahid Beheshti Medical University, Tehran, IR Iran

Fariba Haghnejad

M.s Student of Medical Education, Medical Education Group, Medical Education faculty, Shahid Beheshti Medical University, Tehran, IR Iran

Zeinab Abbasi

PhD Student of Health Service Management, Instructor, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Medical Science Branch of Tehran, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, IR Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Marzabadi A, Hosseini SM, Fajrak H, Nouri R. Comparison between ...
  • Aliasgharpour M, Monjamed Z, Bahrani N. Factors affecting students’ evaluation ...
  • Vahabi A, Nadrian H, Sayyadi M, Iranpour A, Bahmanpour K, ...
  • Vahabi A. The characteristics of a good teacher from the ...
  • Dargahi H, Mohammadzadeh N. Faculty members’ evaluation by students: valid ...
  • Ziaei M, Miri MR, Hajiabadi MR, Azarkar S, Eshbak P. ...
  • Arabi Mianroodi AA, Asgari Baravati Z, Khanjani N. Explaining the ...
  • Shakurnia A, Jouhanmardi A, Komaili Sani H. Students’ opinion on ...
  • Rafiei M, Mosayebi G, Nezam AM. Results of six years ...
  • Ghafourian Borujerdi M, Shakournia A, Elhampour H. Evaluation results feed ...
  • Vahabi A, Rahmani S, Rostami S, Vahabi B, Hosseini M, ...
  • Afshar M, Hasanzadeh Taheri MM, Ryasi HR, Naseri M. Evaluation ...
  • Dehghani Tafti MH, Baghianimoghadam MH, Ehrampoush MH, Ardian N, Seyghal ...
  • Ghadami A, Salehi B, Sajadi S, Naji H. Students’ points ...
  • Navidian A. Nursing student and teachers’ viewpoints toward priorities in ...
  • Griffiths KM, Christensen H. Internet-based mental health programs: a powerful ...
  • Aghamolaei T, Abedini S. Comparison of self and students’ evaluation ...
  • Shakurnia A, Torabpour M, Elhampour H. Correlation between student evaluation ...
  • Ghahramani M, Arefi M, Jamshidi L. Study the effect of ...
  • Maroufi Y, Kiamanesh AR, Mehrmohammadi M, ALI AM. Teaching assessment ...
  • Aghamolaei T, Javadpour S, Abedini S. Attitude of Bandar-Abbas medical ...
  • Amini M, Honardar M. The view of faculties and medical ...
  • Aghamirzayi T, Salehi Omran E, Rahimpour Kami B. Effective Factors ...
  • Vakili A, Hajaghajani S, Rashidy-Pour A, Ghorbani R. An investigation ...
  • Koomesh. ۲۰۱۱;۱۲(۲):۹۳–۱۰۳ ...
  • Arreola RA. Strategy for Developing a Comprehensive Faculty Evaluation System. ...
  • Bauer HH. The new generations: Students who don’t study. Virginia ...
  • Seif AA. Educational measurement and evaluation. Tehran: Doran Pub;۲۰۰۷ ...
  • Rampichini C, Grilli L, Petrucci A. Analysis of university course ...
  • Motaarefi H, Habibzade H, Sakhaie SH. The attitude of students ...
  • Javadi M, Sharifi M, Javadi A. Faculty member’s viewpoint on ...
  • Rahimi M, Zarooj Hosseini R, Darabian M, Taherian AA, Khosravi ...
  • Becker WE, Powers JR. Student performance, attrition, and class size ...
  • Fattahi Z, Adhami A, Nakhaei N, Eslaminejad T. Opinion of ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع