Psychometric Properties of COVID-۱۹ Dot-probe Task in Iranian Adults

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 46

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JPCP-9-3_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 دی 1402

Abstract:

Objective: After the COVID-۱۹ outbreak, corona anxiety has become prevalent all over the world. To understand and treat this type of anxiety, researchers have examined its relationship with attentional bias, a phenomenon closely associated with other types of anxiety. The dot-probe task is a common instrument used for the evaluation of attentional bias. However, the psychometric properties of this instrument, when used for the assessment of attentional bias towards corona-related stimuli, are unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the COVID-۱۹ dot-probe task to see whether its application in COVID-۱۹ studies is justified. Methods: A total of ۳۶۲ Iranian adults completed the COVID-۱۹ dot-probe task and Corona Anxiety Disease Scale (CADS), ۱۴۶ of whom repeated this procedure after two weeks to provide test-retest data. Split-half reliability, the Cronbach α, intraclass correlation coefficient of test-retest scores, and associations between COVID-۱۹ dot-probe task and CADS were calculated using SPSS v. ۲۶. Results: The study results indicated that the standard version of the COVID-۱۹ dot-probe task lacks internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and criterion validity, whereas the response-based version of the instrument promotes all of these psychometric properties to an acceptable level. Conclusion: COVID-۱۹ dot-probe task is a psychometrically sound instrument for evaluating corona-related attentional bias and investigating its role in the mechanism of corona anxiety, only if the response-based method of computation is used for calculating the measures of attentional bias.

Authors

Saeed Nasiry

Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Nastaran Nasiry

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

Mohammad Noori

Department of Clinical Psychology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :