Comparison of abdominal pain after cholecystectomy from umbilical and subxiphoid ports in patients referred to Afzalipour Medical Education Center, Kerman

Publish Year: 1401
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 64

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JSTR-10-3_003

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 دی 1402

Abstract:

Introduction: A consistent concern of surgeons is postoperative pain, whose control both alleviates patient suffering and reduces surgical complications, resulting in a quicker discharge and lower costs. This study aimed to compare abdominal pain (epigastric and right-upper quadrant) and pain at umbilical and subxiphoid ports after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elective candidates at Afzalipour Medical Education Center, Kerman, Iran. Methods: In this clinical trial, ۷۶ candidates for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were assigned to one of two groups via a simple random allocation method. Gallbladders were removed from the subxiphoid port in the control group and the umbilical port in the case group. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the analgesic consumption was measured at ۶ hours, ۲۴ hours, and two weeks postoperatively. Data were analyzed by SPSS ۱۶ software using independent t-test, chi-square, and repeated measures test. Results: The mean port site pain score in the control group at ۶ hours after surgery was ۶.۶±۲.۲, and in the case group, ۶.۳±۱.۹, and this difference was not statistically significant (P=۰.۵۱۹). The mean port pain score in the control group at ۲۴ hours after surgery was ۵.۵±۱.۶ and in the control group was ۴.۹±۱.۱, where the difference was statistically significant (P<۰.۰۱). The mean port site pain score in the control group two weeks after surgery was ۰.۶±۴.۱, while in the control group, it was ۳.۰±۰.۹, where the difference was statistically significant (P<۰.۰۱). Conclusion: The results of our study demonstrated for the first time that there was no significant difference between patients whose gallbladder was removed through the umbilical port and those whose gallbladder was removed through the subxiphoid port concerning abdominal pain (epigastric and RUQ). Nevertheless, the removal of the gallbladder from the umbilical port ۲۴ hours and two weeks after surgery reduced the patient’s port pain. This finding was evidenced descriptively by the VAS and quantitatively by the decline in analgesic prescriptions. Moreover, abdominal pain (epigastric and RUQ) was lower in patients with shorter operations.

Authors

Ali Afsharizade

General Surgery Specialist, Imam Reza Hospital, Sirjan University of Medical Sciences, Sirjan, Iran

Bahram Purseiedi

Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Zabihullah Mohaqiq

Student Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

Siavash Kafian Atary

Student Research Committee, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

Payam Nikuian

Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran

Moein Najmaddini

Nursing Expert, Quality Improvement Unit, Kerman Social Security Hospital, Kerman, Iran

Mohsen Najmaddini

Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Porttncasa P, Stolk M, Van Erpecum K, Palasciano G, van ...
  • Sajedi P, Naghibi K, Soltani H, Amoshahi A. A randomized, ...
  • Keulemans Y, Venneman N, Gouma D, Henegouwen GvB. New strategies ...
  • Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko S-T, ...
  • Wheeler M, Oderda GM, Ashburn MA, Lipman AG. Adverse events ...
  • Jensen K, Kehlet H, Lund CM. Postoperative recovery profile after ...
  • Triantafyllidis I, Nikoloudis N, Sapidis N, Chrissidou M, Kalaitsidou I, ...
  • Memon JM, Memon MR, Arija D, Bozdar AG, Talpur MMA. ...
  • Siddiqui NA, Azami R, Murtaza G, Nasim S. Postoperative port-site ...
  • Nassar A, Ashkar K, Rashed A, Abdulmoneum M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy ...
  • Phillips E, Daykhovsky L, Carroll B, Gershman A, Grundfrest WS.Laparoscopic ...
  • Abbas T, Saleha A, Lateef M, Burhan-ul-Haq FR, Choudhary Z. ...
  • Bashir A, Qureshi AU, Afzal S. Comparison of gallbladder retrieval ...
  • Hajong R, Dhal MR, Natung T, Khongwar D, Jyoti AB, ...
  • Shakya JP, Agrawal N, Kumar A, Singh A, Gogia B, ...
  • Dar UF, Imtiaz U, Ayuob A.Gallbladder retrieval in three ports ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع