Working Memory, Rumination, and Autobiographical Memory Specificity Impairment
Publish place: Iranian Rehabilitation Journal، Vol: 21، Issue: 3
Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 104
This Paper With 8 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_IRJU-21-3_012
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 2 دی 1402
Abstract:
Objectives: Specificity impairment is a memory alteration that occurs in people with major depressive disorder (MDD). In this investigation, we intended to shine a light on obscure aspects of executive resource and capture and rumination frameworks to determine whether these theories are reliable in predicting underlying mechanisms for specificity impairment.
Methods: In this correlational research, we used the convenience sampling method over two months, between January and February ۲۰۲۱. We administrated the digit span working memory test, ruminative response scale (RRS), and autobiographical memory interview to indicate whether working memory capacity and subtypes of rumination can predict memory specificity in people with MDD. Using RRS enabled us to determine the correlation between subtypes of rumination and memory specificity.
Results: Our samples consisted of ۱۰۵ adults (۵۳ males (۵۰.۵%) and ۵۲ females (۴۹.۵%)) with MDD. The participants’ mean age was ۳۳.۳۸ years with a range of ۲۲-۴۳ years. The results no significant difference between gender, marriage, and age groups in terms of memory specificity (P>۰.۰۵). The results of the Spearman correlation coefficient and multiple regression analysis showed that only working memory capacity can predict memory specificity (r=۰.۲۱۶, p<۰.۰۵). There was no significant correlation between brooding and reflection, as two subtypes of rumination and memory specificity.
Discussion: In line with our results, it should be stated that depression is accompanied by executive deficits, which result in memory impairments. These impairments are due to the structural and functional alterations in the brain in the depressed group. As the Carfax model emphasized, working memory capacity is not only required to maintain, define, and hold the optimal retrieval model but it is also crucial to inhibit interfering autobiographical information. Nonetheless, neither brooding nor reflection rumination can predict memory specificity. Therefore, memory capacity is probably occupied due to ineffective search strategies, not rumination.
Coresponding author: Pouria Rahgosha, E-mail: pouria_rahgosha@yahoo.com
Keywords:
Authors
Pouria Rahgosha
Psychiatry and Behavioural Science Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Pezhman Hadinezhad
Psychiatry and Behavioural Science Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Seyed Hamzeh Hosseini
Psychiatry and Behavioural Science Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Ehsan Abedini
Psychiatry and Behavioural Science Research Center, Addiction Institute, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :