The Correlation Between Computerized Cognitive Tests Scores With Functional Cognitive Tests in People With Multiple Sclerosis
Publish place: Iranian Rehabilitation Journal، Vol: 20، Issue: 0
Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 47
This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download
- Certificate
- من نویسنده این مقاله هستم
استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:
شناسه ملی سند علمی:
JR_IRJU-20-0_011
تاریخ نمایه سازی: 5 دی 1402
Abstract:
Objectives: In order to rehabilitate cognitive disorders, it is necessary to carefully evaluate cognitive function. Given the variety of assessments, including computerized and functional tests, the aim of this study was to determine whether computerized test scores really reflect a person’s functional ability. In this study, we measured the correlation between computerized and functional evaluation results
Methods: In this cross-section study, ۴۵ people (۹ males and ۳۶ females) with multiple sclerosis with an Expanded Disability Score (EDSS) of ۱ to ۵ were recruited. To assess their cognitive function, the CANTAB tests (SOC, DMS, and SSP tests) and the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) battery were used. The data were then processed with SPSS software v. ۲۲.
Results: The results showed that the CANTAB test is well correlated with the LOTCA battery. A high correlation was observed between LOTCA’s “visual perception” with delayed matching to sample (r=۰.۹۰۹), LOTCA’s “spatial perception” with spatial span test (r=۰.۹۰۷), LOTCA’s “visual organization” with stocking of Cambridge (r=۰.۹۶۱), and “mental operations” in LOTCA with “stocking of Cambridge” (r=۰.۸۳۵).
Discussion: Due to the very good convergence of these two tests, in many cases, computerized tests can be used instead of functional tests.
Keywords:
Authors
Elyas Monfared
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Hojjat Allah Haghgoo
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ebrahim Pishyareh
Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Rehabilitation, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohsen Vahedi
Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Rehabilitation, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
مراجع و منابع این Paper:
لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :