The Reliability and Validity of Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Functions Tool Teacher’s Form Among Iranian Primary School Students

Publish Year: 1396
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 62

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_IRJU-16-1_004

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 5 دی 1402

Abstract:

Objectives: Behavior rating scales have been developed to increase ecological validity in the measurement of executive functions. As the teachers have a lot of contact with the students in the school environment, behavioral rating scale teacher’s form can provide useful information. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the behavioral rating inventory of executive functions teacher’s form among primary school students of Iran. Methods: The statistical population consisted of primary school students of Jajarm city who were studying in the academic year ۲۰۱۶-۲۰۱۷. Students (n=۳۶۰) were selected through sampling two-stage clusters. The behavioral rating inventory of executive functions (BRIEF) teacher’s form for students was completed by their teachers, and the Wechsler’s coding subscale was completed by the students. Results: The results showed that the internal consistency of this inventory was ۰.۹۸ and for all subscales ranged ۰.۷۵ to ۰.۹۲. Also, subscales related to each other significantly. Regarding convergent validity, Wechsler’s coding subscale had a significant correlation with the subscales of executive functions. Also, results showed that two-factor model with eight subscales were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis.  Discussion: Given the satisfactory reliability and validity of BRIEF tool in the school environment and results of this study indicated the relationship of executive functions with academic problems; this tool could be used to examine students’ executive functions.

Authors

Malahat Amani

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Bojnord, Iran.

Roghaye Asady Gandomani

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Bojnord, Iran.

Abbas Nesayan

Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities, University of Bojnord, Iran.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Burgess PW, Veitch E, de Lacy Costello A, Shallice T. ...
  • Harrison PL, Thomas A, National Association of School Psychologists. Best ...
  • McConaughy S, Ritter D. Best practices in multimethod assessment of ...
  • Gioia GA, Isquith PK, Guy SC, Kenworthy L. Test review, ...
  • Slick DJ, Lautzenhiser A, Sherman EMS, Eyrl K. Frequency of ...
  • Roth RM, Lance CE, Isquith PK, Fischer AS, Giancola PR. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع