Contribution of Imaging to Organs at Risk Dose during Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Publish Year: 1400
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 41

This Paper With 10 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_JBPE-11-2_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 30 دی 1402

Abstract:

Background: The use of imaging is indispensable in modern radiation therapy, both for simulation and treatment delivery. For safe and sure utilization, dose delivery from imaging must be evaluated. Objective: This study aims to investigate the dose to organ at risk (OAR) delivered by imaging during lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and to evaluate its contribution to the treatment total dose.Material and Methods: In this retrospectively study, imaging total dose to organs at risk (OARs) (spinal cord, esophagus, lungs, and heart) and effective dose were retrospectively evaluated from ۱۰۰ consecutive patients of a single institution who had lung SBRT. For each patient, dose was estimated using Monte-Carlo convolution for helical computed tomography (helical CT), Four-Dimensional CT (۴D-CT), and kilovoltage Cone-Beam CT (kV-CBCT). Helical CT and kV-CBCT dose were evaluated for the entire thorax acquisition, while ۴D-CT dose was analyzed on upper lobe (UL) or lower lobe (LL) acquisition. Treatment dose was extracted from treatment planning system and compared to imaging total dose. Results: Imaging total dose maximum values were ۱۱۷ mGy to the spinal cord, ۱۲۷ mGy to the esophagus, ۱۷۶ mGy to the lungs and ۱۹۳ mGy to the heart. The maximum effective dose was ۱۹.۶۵ mSv for helical CT, ۱۰.۶۲ mSv for kV-CBCT, ۲۵.۹۵ mSv and ۳۸.۴۵ mSv for ۴D-CT in UL and LL regions, respectively. Depending on OAR, treatment total dose was higher from ۱.۷ to ۸.۲ times than imaging total dose. Imaging total dose contributed only to ۰.۳% of treatment total dose. Conclusion: Imaging dose delivered with ۴D-CT to the OARs is higher than those of others modalities. The heart received the highest imaging dose for both UL and LL. Total imaging dose is negligible since it contributed only to ۰.۳% of treatment total dose.

Keywords:

Lung , Organs at Risk Exposure , Computed Tomography , Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Authors

Milovan Savanovic

PhD Candidate, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon Hospital, ۷۵۰۲۰ Paris, France

François Gardavaud

PhD Candidate, Department of Radiology, Tenon Hospital, ۷۵۰۲۰ Paris, France

Dražan Jaroš

PhD Candidate, Affidea, International Medical Centers, Center for Radiotherapy, ۷۸۰۰۰ Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Bénédicte Lonkuta

MSc, Department of Radiology, Tenon Hospital, ۷۵۰۲۰ Paris, France

Matthias Barral

MD, Department of Radiology, Tenon Hospital, ۷۵۰۲۰ Paris, France

François Henri Cornelis

PhD, Department of Radiology, Tenon Hospital, ۷۵۰۲۰ Paris, France

Jean-Noël Foulquier

PhD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tenon Hospital, ۷۵۰۲۰ Paris, France

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Abreu CE, Ferreira PP, De Moraes FY, et al. Stereotactic ...
  • Lambrecht M, Sonke JJ, Nestle U, et al. Quality assurance ...
  • Molitoris JK, Diwanji T, Snider III JW, et al. Optimizing ...
  • Srinivasan K. Mohammadi M. Shepherd J. Applications of linac-mounted kilovoltage ...
  • Goyal S. Kataria T. Image guidance in radiation therapy: techniques ...
  • Ding GX, Alaei P, Curran B, et al. Image guidance ...
  • Guckenberger M, Meyer J, Wilbert J, et al. Cone-beam CT ...
  • Brahme A. Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy. Acta Radiol ...
  • Dutreix A. When and how can we improve precision in ...
  • Wambersie A. What accuracy is required and can be achieved ...
  • Herring DF. The degree of precision required in the radiation ...
  • Dzierma Y, Mikulla K, Richter P, et al. Imaging dose ...
  • Zhou L, Bai S, Zhang YB, et al. Imaging Dose, ...
  • Dong Wook K, Weon C, Myonggeun Y. Imaging Doses and ...
  • Spezi E, Downes P, Jarvis R, et al. Patient-specific three-dimensional ...
  • Nakamura M, Ishihara Y, Matsuo Y, et al. Quantification of ...
  • Yang C, Liu R, Ming X, Liu N, Guan Y, ...
  • Li R, Han B, Meng B, et al. Clinical implementation ...
  • Lee C, Kim KP, Bolch WE, Moroz BE, Folio L. ...
  • Menzel HG, Clement C, DeLuca P. ICRP Publication ۱۱۰. Realistic ...
  • Lee C, Lamart S, Moroz BE. Computational lymphatic node models ...
  • Tapiovaara M, Lakkisto M and Servomaa A. PCXMC: a PC-based ...
  • Ahnesjö A. Collapsed cone convolution of radiant energy for photon ...
  • McNutt T. Dose calculations: collapsed cone convolution superposition and delta ...
  • Wilke L, Andratschke N, Blanck O, et al. ICRU report ...
  • Ding GX, Munro P. Radiation exposure to patients from image ...
  • Stock M, Palm A, Altendorfer A, Steiner E, Georg D. ...
  • Nelson AP, Ding GX. An alternative approach to account for ...
  • Murphy MJ, Balter J, Balter S, et al. The management ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع