Effect of Energy, Protein and Microbial Inoculants Additives on Chemical Composition and Fermentation Characteristics of Corn Stover Silage

Publish Year: 1402
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 40

This Paper With 15 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_GJSAR-11-1_006

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 23 بهمن 1402

Abstract:

Corn stover was taken after harvesting the ears immediately, chopped using a harvester chopper machine to ۱.۵-۲.۰ cm of length, and supplemented with energy additive (corn grains and molasses), protein additive (soybean, urea, and opting) and microbial inoculants (effective microorganisms EM۱) and their interactions and ensiled in plastic bags for ۴۵ days. After the ensiling period, representative samples were taken for the determination of chemical composition and silage quality traits. Adding ground corn grains to corn stover silage led to a significant (P<۰.۰۵) increase in DM content. Moreover, NFE content of corn stover silage increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵), however, ash content decreased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with molasses and ground corn grains supplementation. Soybean meal supplementation increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) DM content than those of urea and optigen supplementation with insignificant differences with control. The crude protein content of corn stover silage increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with soybean meal, urea, and Optigen supplementation. Ash content decreased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with soybean meal supplementation. Effective microbes supplementation led to a significant (P<۰.۰۵) increase in the contents of CP and NFE of corn stover silage and a significant (P<۰.۰۵) decrease in the contents of CF and ash. The interaction between energy and protein supplementation showed a significant difference (P<۰.۰۵) in DM content only. Interactions among energy, protein, and effective microbes supplementation showed significant difference (P<۰.۰۵) in DM content only. The pH value of the silage decreased significantly (P<۰.۰۵), however lactic acid concentration increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with molasses and ground corn grains supplementation. The pH value of silage was higher significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with urea and Optigen compared to control and soybean supplementation. Urea-supplemented silage recorded significantly (P<۰.۰۵) the NH۳-N concentration followed by Optigen, then soybean meal, whoever control had the lowest concentration. Moreover, soybean meal-supplemented silage showed significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher concentrations of TVFAs and lactic acid compared to urea-supplemented silage. The concentrations of NH۳-N and lactic acid increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with effective microbes supplement to corn stover silage. Energy and protein supplementation interaction revealed that urea with molasses or ground corn grains recorded significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher pH values and NH۳-H concentration of silage compared to soybean with molasses or ground corn grains. However, soybean meal with molasses or ground corn grains recorded significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher concentrations of TVFA’s and lactic acid in silage compared to urea with molasses or ground corn grains. The interaction between protein and effective microbes showed that urea with EM۱ supplemented silage had significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher pH value and NH۳-N concentration and lower TVFA’s and lactic acid concentrations than those of soybean meal with EM۱. The interaction among energy, protein, and effective microbes showed that molasses or ground corn grains with urea plus EM۱ supplemented silages had significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher pH value and NH۳-N concentration and lower TVFA’s and lactic acid concentrations than those of molasses or ground corn grains with soybean meal plus EM۱. The pH value of the silage decreased significantly (P<۰.۰۵), however lactic acid concentration increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with molasses and ground corn grains supplementation. The pH value of silage was higher significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with urea and Optigen compared to control and soybean supplementation. Urea-supplemented silage recorded significantly (P<۰.۰۵) the NH۳-N concentration followed by Optigen, then soybean meal, whoever control had the lowest concentration. Moreover, soybean meal-supplemented silage showed significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher concentrations of TVFA’s and lactic acid compared to urea-supplemented silage. The concentrations of NH۳-N and lactic acid increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with effective microbes supplement to corn stover silage. Energy and protein supplementation interaction revealed that urea with molasses or ground corn grains recorded significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher pH values and NH۳-H concentration of silage compared to soybean with molasses or ground corn grains. However, soybean meal with molasses or ground corn grains recorded significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher concentrations of TVFA’s and lactic acid in silage compared to urea with molasses or ground corn grains. The interaction between protein and effective microbes showed that urea with EM۱ supplemented silage had significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher pH value and NH۳-N concentration and lower TVFA’s and lactic acid concentrations than those of soybean meal with EM۱. The interaction among energy, protein and effective microbes showed that molasses or ground corn grains with urea plus EM۱ supplemented silages had significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher pH value and NH۳-N concentration and lower TVFA’s and lactic acid concentrations than those of molasses or ground corn grains with soybean meal plus EM۱.Corn stover was taken after harvesting the ears immediately, chopped using a harvester chopper machine to ۱.۵-۲.۰ cm of length, and supplemented with energy additive (corn grains and molasses), protein additive (soybean, urea, and opting) and microbial inoculants (effective microorganisms EM۱) and their interactions and ensiled in plastic bags for ۴۵ days. After the ensiling period, representative samples were taken for the determination of chemical composition and silage quality traits. Adding ground corn grains to corn stover silage led to a significant (P<۰.۰۵) increase in DM content. Moreover, NFE content of corn stover silage increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵), however, ash content decreased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with molasses and ground corn grains supplementation. Soybean meal supplementation increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) DM content than those of urea and optigen supplementation with insignificant differences with control. The crude protein content of corn stover silage increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with soybean meal, urea, and Optigen supplementation. Ash content decreased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with soybean meal supplementation. Effective microbes supplementation led to a significant (P<۰.۰۵) increase in the contents of CP and NFE of corn stover silage and a significant (P<۰.۰۵) decrease in the contents of CF and ash. The interaction between energy and protein supplementation showed a significant difference (P<۰.۰۵) in DM content only. Interactions among energy, protein, and effective microbes supplementation showed significant difference (P<۰.۰۵) in DM content only. The pH value of the silage decreased significantly (P<۰.۰۵), however lactic acid concentration increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with molasses and ground corn grains supplementation. The pH value of silage was higher significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with urea and Optigen compared to control and soybean supplementation. Urea-supplemented silage recorded significantly (P<۰.۰۵) the NH۳-N concentration followed by Optigen, then soybean meal, whoever control had the lowest concentration. Moreover, soybean meal-supplemented silage showed significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher concentrations of TVFAs and lactic acid compared to urea-supplemented silage. The concentrations of NH۳-N and lactic acid increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with effective microbes supplement to corn stover silage. Energy and protein supplementation interaction revealed that urea with molasses or ground corn grains recorded significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher pH values and NH۳-H concentration of silage compared to soybean with molasses or ground corn grains. However, soybean meal with molasses or ground corn grains recorded significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher concentrations of TVFA’s and lactic acid in silage compared to urea with molasses or ground corn grains. The interaction between protein and effective microbes showed that urea with EM۱ supplemented silage had significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher pH value and NH۳-N concentration and lower TVFA’s and lactic acid concentrations than those of soybean meal with EM۱. The interaction among energy, protein, and effective microbes showed that molasses or ground corn grains with urea plus EM۱ supplemented silages had significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher pH value and NH۳-N concentration and lower TVFA’s and lactic acid concentrations than those of molasses or ground corn grains with soybean meal plus EM۱. The pH value of the silage decreased significantly (P<۰.۰۵), however lactic acid concentration increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with molasses and ground corn grains supplementation. The pH value of silage was higher significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with urea and Optigen compared to control and soybean supplementation. Urea-supplemented silage recorded significantly (P<۰.۰۵) the NH۳-N concentration followed by Optigen, then soybean meal, whoever control had the lowest concentration. Moreover, soybean meal-supplemented silage showed significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher concentrations of TVFA’s and lactic acid compared to urea-supplemented silage. The concentrations of NH۳-N and lactic acid increased significantly (P<۰.۰۵) with effective microbes supplement to corn stover silage. Energy and protein supplementation interaction revealed that urea with molasses or ground corn grains recorded significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher pH values and NH۳-H concentration of silage compared to soybean with molasses or ground corn grains. However, soybean meal with molasses or ground corn grains recorded significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher concentrations of TVFA’s and lactic acid in silage compared to urea with molasses or ground corn grains. The interaction between protein and effective microbes showed that urea with EM۱ supplemented silage had significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher pH value and NH۳-N concentration and lower TVFA’s and lactic acid concentrations than those of soybean meal with EM۱. The interaction among energy, protein and effective microbes showed that molasses or ground corn grains with urea plus EM۱ supplemented silages had significantly (P<۰.۰۵) higher pH value and NH۳-N concentration and lower TVFA’s and lactic acid concentrations than those of molasses or ground corn grains with soybean meal plus EM۱.

Authors

Hamed Mohamed Gaafar

Animal Production Research Institute (APRI), Agriculture Research Center, Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt

Mohamed Kamel Mohsen

Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh ۳۳۵۱۶, Egypt

Elsayed Mohamed Abdel-Raouf

Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh ۳۳۵۱۶, Egypt

Wasef Abdel-aziz Riad Abdel-aziz Riad

Animal Production Research Institute (APRI), Agriculture Research Center, Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt

Nadia Ibrahim Hassan

Animal Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh ۳۳۵۱۶, Egypt

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Allman, J.G. and L.A. Stern (1999). BiomaxÒ5 Microbial Inoculant for ...
  • Analytical Chemistry of foods (1995). Published by Blockie academic and ...
  • AOAC (1990).Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official ...
  • Bilal, M.Q. (2009). Effect of molasses and corn as silage ...
  • Boin, C. (1975). Elephant (Napier) Grass Silage Production Effect of ...
  • Bolsen, K.K. (1999). Silage Management in North America in the ...
  • Bolsen, K.K.; D.R.Bonilla; G.L.Huck; M.A.Young; R.A.Hart-Thakur and A.Joyeaux (1996). Effect ...
  • Caro, D., S.J. Davis; E. Kebreab and F. Mitloehner (2018). ...
  • Dalgaard, R.; J. Schmidt; N. Halberg; P. Christensen; M. Thrane ...
  • Dawson, T.E. (1994). Propionic acid-producing bacteria as bioinoculants for the ...
  • Dreihuis, F.; S.F.Spoelstra; S.C.J. Cole and R.Morgan (1996). Improving Aerobic ...
  • FAO. (2012). States of the World’s Forests. Food and Agriculture ...
  • FAO. (2017). Formation of the Technical Advisory Group on feed ...
  • Flores-Galaraza, R.O.; B.A.Glatz; C.J. Bernand L.D. Van Fossen (1985). Preservation ...
  • Gerber, P.J.; H. Steinfeld; B. Henderson; A. Mottet; C. Opio; ...
  • Glewen, M.J. and A.W. Young (1982). Effect of Ammoniation on ...
  • Haigh, P.M. (1988). The effect of wilting and silage additives ...
  • Henderson, N. (1993). Silage Additives. Animal Feed Science and Technology, ...
  • IBM SPSS Statistics (2020). Statistical Package for the Social Science. ...
  • Kazer, J. and J. Madoc-Jones (2019). Alltech Optigen® Carbon Trust ...
  • Keady, T.W.J. (1996). A Review of the Effects of Molasses ...
  • Kertz, A.F. (2010). Review: Urea Feeding to Dairy Cattle: A ...
  • Kung, L., W.M. Craig and L.D.Satter (1989). Ammonia-Treated Alfalfa Silage ...
  • Kung, L.; N.K.Ranjit; J.R.Robinson and R.C.Charley (1999). The Effect of ...
  • Lattemae, P.; A.Laats and U.Tamm (2006). The Technological Factors Affecting ...
  • Lehuger, S.; B. Gabrielle and N. Gagnaire (2009). Environmental impact ...
  • McDonald, P.; A.R. Henderson and S.J.E.Heron (1991). The Biochemistry of ...
  • Merry, R.J.; R.F.Cussen-MacKenna; A.P. Williamsand J.K.S. Tweed (1993). The Effect ...
  • Nayigihugu, V.; D.W. Kellogg; Z.B. Johnson; M. Scott and K.S. ...
  • Nursoy, H.; S. Deniz; M. Demirel and N. Denek (2003). ...
  • Ojeda, F. (1993). Conservantesquimicosen la preservacion de ensilajestropicales. Pastos y ...
  • Oliveira, A.S. (1995). Rapid pH reductions in silages. Vol. 12, ...
  • Ridla, M. and S.Vehida (1998). Effects of combined treatment of ...
  • Sariçiçek, B.Z. and U. Kiliç (2009). The Effects of Different ...
  • Singh, A.; J.C. Edward; S. Mor and K. Singh (1996). ...
  • Tosi, H.; L.R. Rodrigues; A. De; C.C. Jobim; R.L. Oliveira; ...
  • Vilela, D. (1984). Aditivos na ensilagem. Coronel Pacheco, MG: EMBRAPA-CNPGL, ...
  • Warner, A.C.I. (1964). Production of volatile fatty acids in the ...
  • Weinberg, Z.G. and G.Ashbell (1993). Biological Silage Additives-Summary of Experiments ...
  • Weiss, B. and J. Underwood (2009). Silage Additives. Ohio State ...
  • Woolford, M.K. (1984). The Silage Fermentation. Marcel Decker, New York. ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع