Cost-Effectiveness analysis of malaria diagnosis techniques in patients with suspected malaria in Hormozgan province- ۲۰۱۲

Publish Year: 1394
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 28

This Paper With 6 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_HMJ-19-3_005

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 28 بهمن 1402

Abstract:

Introduction: Since ancient times Malaria in Iran has been considered as a serious health risk, especially in Hormozgan Province, as no other disease like Malaria has imposed irreparable financial and life losses to the country. Since saving costs in the healthcare sector comes as first priority in most countries, this study aims at launching a cost-effectiveness analysis on malaria diagnosis diseases in the fevered patients with suspected malaria in Hormozgan Province. Methods: The target population of this study was all fevered patients with suspected malaria who have referred to the healthcare centers. All subjects whose disease was diagnosed correctly (both truly positive and truly negative) with microscopy methods and malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) were selected as the final population in this study. Decision tree analysis and Treeage۲۰۱۱ software were used for conducting cost-effectiveness analysis and sensitivity analysis of both abovementioned methods. Sensitivity analysis was performed for the key variables. Results: Results of the study indicated that the total cost of the microscopy method was ۱۸۲۹۳۵۷۶۰۰۰.۲ Rials and the total cost of RDT method was ۱۷۳۹۹۸۰۰۰۰ rials. Cost per each correct diagnosis by RDT was ۱۷۳۹۹ rials and cost per each correct diagnosis by microscopy method was ۱۸۲۹۳ rials. The total cost-effectiveness resulted from microscopy and RTD methods were ۹۲۱۳۵ and ۹۰۲۹۸ cases, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for each correct diagnosis by the microscopy method in contrast to RTD method was ۴۷۰۵۲ rials. The mean cost-effectiveness ratio for RDT was ۱۹۲۸۹; whereas it was ۱۹۸۶۲ for the microscopy method. Sensitivity analysis results indicate that when sensitivity of the microscopy method for Plasmodium vivax is below ۰.۹۸۱, then RDT will be the cost effective method. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that RDT in contrast to the microscopy method is cost-effective, if its high accuracy is maintained.