Effect of different spacing of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) intercropped with or without Lablab (Lablab purpureus) on biomass yield and nutritional value of Napier grass

Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 67

This Paper With 14 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SJPAS-5-9_002

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 3 اسفند 1402

Abstract:

This study was conducted with an objective of determining effect of three spacing of Napier grass intercropped with or without Lablab (Lablab purpureus) on the biomass yield and nutritive value of Napier grass forage in a ۲ x ۳ factorial arrangement in RCBD with ۴ blocks. Spacing was ۱m x ۰.۵m, ۰.۷۵m x ۰.۵m, and ۰.۵m x ۰.۵m. Intercropping decreased the electro conductivity but increased the available phosphorous content of the soil and did not affect the pH, organic carbon and total nitrogen of the soil. Spacing, intercropping and their interaction had no significant effect (P>۰.۰۵) on dry matter (DM) yield (DMY) and crude protein (CP) yield (CPY) of the Napier grass. Intercropping and interaction of intercropping with spacing resulted to higher total DMY and CPY (P<۰.۰۵). The chemical composition of Napier grass was unaffected by spacing and interaction of intercropping with spacing. Intercropping of Napier grass with lablab however, increased the DM contents (P<۰.۰۵) of the Napier grass and decreased the ash contents. In conclusion, intercropping with lablab had a positive influence on the TDMY, TCPY, DM, hence increase the total forage yield and nutritive value of Napier grass. Conversely, spacing failed to have significant impact on these parameters. As such ۱ m x ۰.۵m spacing and intercropping with lablab can be of a better choice based on the results of this study.This study was conducted with an objective of determining effect of three spacing of Napier grass intercropped with or without Lablab (Lablab purpureus) on the biomass yield and nutritive value of Napier grass forage in a ۲ x ۳ factorial arrangement in RCBD with ۴ blocks. Spacing was ۱m x ۰.۵m, ۰.۷۵m x ۰.۵m, and ۰.۵m x ۰.۵m. Intercropping decreased the electro conductivity but increased the available phosphorous content of the soil and did not affect the pH, organic carbon and total nitrogen of the soil. Spacing, intercropping and their interaction had no significant effect (P>۰.۰۵) on dry matter (DM) yield (DMY) and crude protein (CP) yield (CPY) of the Napier grass. Intercropping and interaction of intercropping with spacing resulted to higher total DMY and CPY (P<۰.۰۵). The chemical composition of Napier grass was unaffected by spacing and interaction of intercropping with spacing. Intercropping of Napier grass with lablab however, increased the DM contents (P<۰.۰۵) of the Napier grass and decreased the ash contents. In conclusion, intercropping with lablab had a positive influence on the TDMY, TCPY, DM, hence increase the total forage yield and nutritive value of Napier grass. Conversely, spacing failed to have significant impact on these parameters. As such ۱ m x ۰.۵m spacing and intercropping with lablab can be of a better choice based on the results of this study.

Authors

Usman Semman Mohammed

Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box ۳۵, Ziway, Ethiopia

Getachew Animut

Haramaya University, School of Animal and Range Sciences, P.O. Box ۱۳۸ Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

Mengistu Urge

Haramaya University, School of Animal and Range Sciences, P.O. Box ۱۳۸ Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmed, H., Abule, E., Mohammed, K., Treydte, A.C., 2010. Livestock ...
  • Anthony, W., 2006. Lablab fact sheet for grain and graze. ...
  • AOAC, 1990. Official methods of analysis of association of official ...
  • Basweti, E., Hanson, J., Asebe Abdena, 2009. Evaluation of productivity ...
  • Center for new crops and plant products, 2002. Pennisetum purpureum ...
  • Chinosaeng, W., Nuntachomchoun, P., Suksaran, W., 2000. Effect of plant ...
  • Cottenie, A., 1980. Soil and plant testing as a basis ...
  • Deb, P.D., Al, H., Marty, J., 1995. A guide to ...
  • Driven, L., Robert, B., Cate, B., Nelson, L.A., 1973. Discontinuous ...
  • Hanson, J., Peters, M., 2003. Meeting the need for herbage ...
  • ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), 2001. ILRI 2000-2001: Deciphering the ...
  • ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), 2013. Getting superior Napier grass ...
  • ILRI, 2010a. Information leaflet on livestock feeds and feeding technologies ...
  • ILRI, 2010b. Napier or elephant grass ILRI 14984 (Pennisetum purpureum) ...
  • Kabirizi, J., Mpairwe, D., Mutetikka, D., 2007. The effect of ...
  • Kariuki, J.N., Boer, H., Tamminga, S., Gitau, G.K., Gachuiri, C.K., ...
  • Kariuki, J.N., Tamminga, S., Gachuiri, C.K., Gitau, G.K., Muia, J.M.K., ...
  • Kazemi, M., Tahmasbi, A.M., Naserian, A.A., Valizadeh, R., Moheghi, M.M., ...
  • Kellems, R.O., Church, D.C., 1998. Livestock Feeds & Feeding. (4th ...
  • McDonald, P., Edwards, R.A., Greenhalgh, J.D., Morgan, C.A., 2002. Animal ...
  • MOARD’s Livestock Master Plan, 2008. Livestock development master plan study. ...
  • Moore, K.J., Hatfield, R.D., 1994. Carbohydrates and forage quality. 229-298. ...
  • Mwangi, D.M., Wambugu, C., 2010. Forage legume technologies: Participatory experiences ...
  • Njoka-Njiru, E.N., Njarui, M.G., Abdulrazak, S.A., Mureithi, J.G., 2006. Effect ...
  • Ojo, V.O.A., Dele, P.A., Amole, T.A., Anele, V.Y., Adeoye, S.A., ...
  • Olsen, S., Cole, C., Watanabe, F., Dean, L., 1954. Estimation ...
  • Orodho, A.B., 2006. The role and importance of Napier grass ...
  • Reed, J.D., Yilma, K., Fossel, L.K., 1986. Factors affecting the ...
  • Sanford, J., Ashly, S., 2008. IGAD livestock policy initiative: Livestock ...
  • Singh, G.P., Oosting, S.J., 1992. A model for describing the ...
  • Sintayehu, G., Samuel, A., Derek, B., Ayele, S., 2010. Diagnostic ...
  • Solomon, B., Solomon, M., Alemu, Y., 2008. Influence of rainfall ...
  • Sumran, W., Pornchai, L., Chutipong, A., 2009. Effects of plant ...
  • Tarawali, S.A., Tarawali, G., Lirbi, A., Hanson, J., 1995. Method ...
  • Taye, B., Solomon, M., Prasad, N.K., 2007. Effects of cutting ...
  • Tekalign, T., Hague, I., Aduayi, E.E., 1991. Soil, plant, water, ...
  • Tesema Zewdu, Baars, R., Alemu Yami, 2002a. Effect of plant ...
  • Tesema Zewdu, Baars, R., Alemu Yami, 2003. Effect of plant ...
  • Tesema Zewdu, Baars, R., Alemu Yami, Negassa, D., 2002b. In ...
  • Teshome, A., Nigussie, D., Yibekal, A., 2012. Sweet potato growth ...
  • Tessema, Z., 2008. Effect of density on morphological characteristics, yield ...
  • The Netherlands Commissioned by Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, 1985. ...
  • Van Reeujik, L.P., 1992. Procedure for soil analysis 2nd edition, ...
  • Van Soest, P.J., 1982. Nutritional ecology of ruminants O and ...
  • Van Soest, P.J., 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, Comstock ...
  • Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., 1985. Analysis of forages and ...
  • Walkley, A., Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع