Effect of different spacing of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) intercropped with or without Lablab (Lablab purpureus) on digestibility of Napier grass

Publish Year: 1395
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 41

This Paper With 14 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SJPAS-5-9_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 3 اسفند 1402

Abstract:

This study was conducted with an objective of determining effect of three spacing of Napier grass intercropped with or without Lablab (Lablab purpureus) on digestibility of Napier grass in a ۲ x ۳ factorial arrangement in RCBD with ۴ blocks. Spacing was ۱m x ۰.۵m, ۰.۷۵m x ۰.۵m, and ۰.۵m x ۰.۵m. Intercropping decreased the electro conductivity but increased the available phosphorous content of the soil and did not affect the pH, organic carbon and total nitrogen of the soil. The in vitro DM (IVDMD) and OM digestibility (IVOMD) of Napier grass was increased by intercropping with lablab. However, spacing and interaction of spacing with intercropping did not affect the IVDMD and IVOMD content of Napier grass. In sacco degradability of DM and OM of Napier grass for many of the incubation hours including ۴۸ hour which was relatively higher for the ۱m x ۰.۵m spacing and for the one intercropped with lablab. The DM and OM in sacco degradability characteristics were almost all affected by spacing and intercropping but without an apparent consistent trend. In conclusion, intercropping with lablab had a positive influence on the IVDMD and IVOMD. Conversely, spacing failed to have significant impact on these parameters. However, ۱ m x ۰.۵ m spacing appeared to have better effect on the in sacco DM and OM degradability and effective degradability. As such ۱ m x ۰.۵m spacing and intercropping with lablab can be of a better choice based on the results of this study.This study was conducted with an objective of determining effect of three spacing of Napier grass intercropped with or without Lablab (Lablab purpureus) on digestibility of Napier grass in a ۲ x ۳ factorial arrangement in RCBD with ۴ blocks. Spacing was ۱m x ۰.۵m, ۰.۷۵m x ۰.۵m, and ۰.۵m x ۰.۵m. Intercropping decreased the electro conductivity but increased the available phosphorous content of the soil and did not affect the pH, organic carbon and total nitrogen of the soil. The in vitro DM (IVDMD) and OM digestibility (IVOMD) of Napier grass was increased by intercropping with lablab. However, spacing and interaction of spacing with intercropping did not affect the IVDMD and IVOMD content of Napier grass. In sacco degradability of DM and OM of Napier grass for many of the incubation hours including ۴۸ hour which was relatively higher for the ۱m x ۰.۵m spacing and for the one intercropped with lablab. The DM and OM in sacco degradability characteristics were almost all affected by spacing and intercropping but without an apparent consistent trend. In conclusion, intercropping with lablab had a positive influence on the IVDMD and IVOMD. Conversely, spacing failed to have significant impact on these parameters. However, ۱ m x ۰.۵ m spacing appeared to have better effect on the in sacco DM and OM degradability and effective degradability. As such ۱ m x ۰.۵m spacing and intercropping with lablab can be of a better choice based on the results of this study.

Authors

Usman Semman Mohammed

Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, P.O. Box ۳۵, Ziway, Ethiopia

Getachew Animut

Haramaya University, School of Animal and Range Sciences, P.O. Box ۱۳۸ Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

Mengistu Urge

Haramaya University, School of Animal and Range Sciences, P.O. Box ۱۳۸ Dire Dawa, Ethiopia

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Ahmed, H., Abule, E., Mohammed, K., Treydte, A.C., 2010. Livestock ...
  • Anthony, W., 2006. Lablab fact sheet for grain and graze. ...
  • AOAC, 1990. Official methods of analysis of association of official ...
  • Basweti, E., Hanson, J., Asebe Abdena, 2009. Evaluation of productivity ...
  • Center for new crops and plant products, 2002. Pennisetum purpureum ...
  • Cottenie, A., 1980. Soil and plant testing as a basis ...
  • Deb, P.D., Al, H., Marty, J., 1995. A guide to ...
  • Driven, L., Robert, B., Cate, B., Nelson, L.A., 1973. Discontinuous ...
  • Hanson, J., Peters, M., 2003. Meeting the need for herbage ...
  • ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), 2001. ILRI 2000-2001: Deciphering the ...
  • ILRI (International Livestock Research Institute), 2013. Getting superior Napier grass ...
  • ILRI, 2010a. Information leaflet on livestock feeds and feeding technologies ...
  • ILRI, 2010b. Napier or elephant grass ILRI 14984 (Pennisetum purpureum) ...
  • Jeans, N., Yolande, J.P., 2007. Prediction of digestibility of organic ...
  • Kabirizi, J., Mpairwe, D., Mutetikka, D., 2007. The effect of ...
  • Kariuki, J.N., Boer, H., Tamminga, S., Gitau, G.K., Gachuiri, C.K., ...
  • MOARD’s Livestock Master Plan, 2008. Livestock development master plan study. ...
  • Njoka-Njiru, E.N., Njarui, M.G., Abdulrazak, S.A., Mureithi, J.G., 2006. Effect ...
  • Olsen, S., Cole, C., Watanabe, F., Dean, L., 1954. Estimation ...
  • Orodho, A.B., 2006. The role and importance of Napier grass ...
  • Ørskov, E.R., and McDonald, I., 1997. The estimation of protein ...
  • Owen, E., Jayasuriya, M.C.N., 1989. Use of crop residues as ...
  • Pinkerton, B., 2005. Forage quality. Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service. ...
  • Sanford, J., Ashly, S., 2008. IGAD livestock policy initiative: Livestock ...
  • Sintayehu, G., Samuel, A., Derek, B., Ayele, S., 2010. Diagnostic ...
  • Solomon, B., Solomon, M., Alemu, Y., 2008. Influence of rainfall ...
  • Sumran, W., Pornchai, L., Chutipong, A., 2009. Effects of plant ...
  • Taye, B., Solomon, M., Prasad, N.K., 2007. Effects of cutting ...
  • Tekalign, T., Hague, I., Aduayi, E.E., 1991. Soil, plant, water, ...
  • Tesema Zewdu, Baars, R., Alemu Yami, 2002a. Effect of plant ...
  • Tesema Zewdu, Baars, R., Alemu Yami, 2003. Effect of plant ...
  • Tesema Zewdu, Baars, R., Alemu Yami, Negassa, D., 2002b. In ...
  • Tesemma Zewdu, 2000. Productivity, Nutritive value and digestibility of Elephant ...
  • Teshome, A., Nigussie, D., Yibekal, A., 2012. Sweet potato growth ...
  • The Netherlands Commissioned by Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, 1985. ...
  • Van Reeujik, L.P., 1992. Procedure for soil analysis 2nd edition, ...
  • Van Soest, P.J., 1982. Nutritional ecology of ruminants O and ...
  • Van Soest, P.J., 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, Comstock ...
  • Walkley, A., Black, I.A., 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع