Safflower growing degree days in different temperature regimes

Publish Year: 1393
نوع سند: مقاله ژورنالی
زبان: English
View: 18

This Paper With 7 Page And PDF Format Ready To Download

  • Certificate
  • من نویسنده این مقاله هستم

استخراج به نرم افزارهای پژوهشی:

لینک ثابت به این Paper:

شناسه ملی سند علمی:

JR_SJCS-3-12_001

تاریخ نمایه سازی: 5 اسفند 1402

Abstract:

The plant growth and development are affected by many environmental factors, but the air temperature is the most effective one. During growing season plants accumulate growing degree days (GDD) or heat unit to complete a growth stage. Therefore, the GDD or HU is more accurate for prediction of developmental stages than number of days for different environmental and planting date. A field experiment was conducted in ۲۰۰۷-۲۰۰۸ at Kabotarabad Agricultural Research Station of Isfahan. Eight planting dates (March ۵, March ۲۰, April ۳, April ۱۸, May ۴, May ۱۹, June ۵, and June ۲۲) and three safflower cultivars (Arak, Sofea and Goldasht) were evaluated, using a randomized complete block design with split- plot layout in six replications. Dates of planting were considered as the main plot and cultivars were randomized in the sub-plots. Date of planting significantly affected number of days and GDD of developmental stages and seed yield. Delay in planting until seven planting date reduced seed yield and length of planting to emergence, emergence to head visible, emergence to flowering, emergence to ripening, planting to ripening and seed yield. These traits increased a little in eight planting date but GDD of these stages did not show any specific trend.  Cultivars significantly affected developmental stages duration and related GDD. Sofeh and Goldasht were the latest and earliest cultivars, respectively. There was no significant difference among seed yield of cultivars.The plant growth and development are affected by many environmental factors, but the air temperature is the most effective one. During growing season plants accumulate growing degree days (GDD) or heat unit to complete a growth stage. Therefore, the GDD or HU is more accurate for prediction of developmental stages than number of days for different environmental and planting date. A field experiment was conducted in ۲۰۰۷-۲۰۰۸ at Kabotarabad Agricultural Research Station of Isfahan. Eight planting dates (March ۵, March ۲۰, April ۳, April ۱۸, May ۴, May ۱۹, June ۵, and June ۲۲) and three safflower cultivars (Arak, Sofea and Goldasht) were evaluated, using a randomized complete block design with split- plot layout in six replications. Dates of planting were considered as the main plot and cultivars were randomized in the sub-plots. Date of planting significantly affected number of days and GDD of developmental stages and seed yield. Delay in planting until seven planting date reduced seed yield and length of planting to emergence, emergence to head visible, emergence to flowering, emergence to ripening, planting to ripening and seed yield. These traits increased a little in eight planting date but GDD of these stages did not show any specific trend.  Cultivars significantly affected developmental stages duration and related GDD. Sofeh and Goldasht were the latest and earliest cultivars, respectively. There was no significant difference among seed yield of cultivars.

مراجع و منابع این Paper:

لیست زیر مراجع و منابع استفاده شده در این Paper را نمایش می دهد. این مراجع به صورت کاملا ماشینی و بر اساس هوش مصنوعی استخراج شده اند و لذا ممکن است دارای اشکالاتی باشند که به مرور زمان دقت استخراج این محتوا افزایش می یابد. مراجعی که مقالات مربوط به آنها در سیویلیکا نمایه شده و پیدا شده اند، به خود Paper لینک شده اند :
  • Dadashi, N., Khajehpour, M.R., 2004. Effects of temperature and day ...
  • Zand, A., 1985. Basis of morphological and physiological of yield ...
  • Shahsavari, M.R., Yasari, T., Omidi, A.H., 2012. Effects of planting ...
  • Yasari, T., Shahsavari, M.R., Barzeagarand, B., Omidi, A.H., 1995. Study ...
  • Cho, M.H., Tae, R.H., 1995. Effects of planting date on ...
  • Delavega, A., Hall, A.J., 2002. Effects of planting date, genotypes ...
  • Emami, T., Naseri, R., Falahi, H., Kazemi, E., 2011. Response ...
  • Froozan, K., 2005. Safflower Production in Iran (Past, Now, Future). ...
  • Gilmore, E.J. and, J.S. Rogers. 1985; Heat unit as method ...
  • Mundel, H.H., Morrison, R.J., Blackshaw, R.E., Entz, T., Roth, B.T., ...
  • Nickabadi, S., Solemani, A., Dehbashti, S.M., Yazdanibakhsh, M., 2008. Effect ...
  • Omidi, A.H., Sharifmogdas, M.R., 2010. Evaluation of Iranian Safflower cultivars ...
  • Pandya, N.K., Gupta, S.C., Nagada, A.K., 1996. Path analysis of ...
  • Rohini, V.K., Sankora, K.R., 2000. Emryo transformation, a practical approach ...
  • Oke, T.R., 1978. Boundary Layer Climate. London, Mrthuen and Coltd. ...
  • Sediqi, M.N., 2012. Adaptabilty of oilseed species at high altitudes ...
  • Shaykewhich, C.F., 1995. An appraisal of cereal crop phonology modeling. ...
  • Weiss, E.A., 2000. Oilseed Crops. Black Well Sci. Ltd. ...
  • Zheng, N.C., Futtang, C., Xinchum, S., Yanaci, W.,1993. Path analysis ...
  • نمایش کامل مراجع